Docker vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Docker and Splunk are both solutions in the Container Management category. Docker is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while Splunk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6. Docker holds a 2.9% mindshare in CM, compared to Splunk’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Docker users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Docker

Read 56 Docker reviews

1,362 Views
1,085 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 50 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

107 Views
55 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Docker

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 6, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Docker compete in the monitoring and containerization markets. Docker seems to have the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and ease of use, while Splunk is recognized for its advanced monitoring capabilities.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud is known for its comprehensive monitoring, customizable dashboards, and real-time notifications, which offer valuable insights into application performance and security. It provides extensive data integration and end-to-end visibility into the infrastructure. Docker's strengths include user-friendly containerization, excellent portability, and integration with various environments. It features an easy setup, seamless environment replication, and strong security and scalability options.

Room for Improvement: Splunk Observability Cloud users seek enhancements in pricing, scalability, integration with other tools, automation, stability, and user-friendly documentation. Docker could improve its stability, documentation, and advanced features. Users also express interest in security vulnerability reports and enhanced user interface options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud supports flexible deployments across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, with generally responsive customer support, though faster assistance is desired. Docker offers straightforward deployment across various environments and benefits from robust community support, although direct support could be more intuitive. Splunk provides a structured support system, while Docker uses its open-source nature for self-guided solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher price point, raising concerns about long-term cost-effectiveness compared to competitors. Nonetheless, users report a positive ROI through improved visibility and efficiency. Docker's open-source solution is cost-effective with optional paid enterprise features. It is appreciated for its affordability and ROI when enterprise features are utilized. Docker's pricing flexibility and open-source model attract a wider audience.

To learn more, read our detailed Docker vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Docker

Ranking in Container Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Development Platforms (1st), Software Supply Chain Security (6th)

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Container Management

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (11th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), Cloud Monitoring Software (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Docker is 2.9%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 0.5%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Rikin Parekh

Backend Engineer at Northeastern University

Useful to create sandbox environments to run applications and makes it easy to test them

Overall, setting up the Docker environment is quite easy. Many methods exist, such as using Docker Compose and Docker networks to communicate between containers. The main challenge lies in designing the architecture and integrating different frameworks and microservices. I would rate the ease of setting up the tool at around nine out of ten. The time it takes to deploy depends on the scale of the system. For the early-stage startup I'm currently working with, it doesn't take much time. It's just me handling the deployment. In our early-stage startup, we have a couple of teams with around four to five backend APIs and two front-end services. Deploying these doesn't take much time. My focus is more on minimizing costs due to our lean startup structure.

Read full review

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Docker allows you to create small applications and containerize them. You can create multiple such application containers that can run simultaneously on the Linux operating system. In a DevOps environment where multiple teams are creating applications, developing new versions, and deploying applications frequently, Docker is very helpful. The greatest benefit of the solution is that you can create applications and multiple versions of the same application, distributing them across various Linux platforms. Setting up Docker is very quick; whereas setting up a Linux operating system can take five to ten minutes, you can set up a Docker-based Linux OS container within minutes. For developers who frequently create and deploy applications, Docker makes it easy to quickly develop, deploy, and run the latest versions. The solution’s stability is great. I rate it a nine out of ten. Regarding scalability, Docker doesn't require any separate configuration for multiple users. If you are trying to create an application quickly for testing or development purposes, Docker is the best tool available."

"The most valuable feature is Docker has a fast learning curve."

"Kubernetes is the primary container orchestration tool I use with this solution. Docker provides a complete solution for deploying and managing workloads across multiple nodes. Container orchestration has significantly impacted my workload by automating tasks and streamlining operations. The availability of systems like Kubernetes is crucial for planning and managing complete clusters and computing environments. Every client's needs are different, and not one solution fits all."

"Traditional deployments take more time and builds can be inconsistent across different environments. Docker solves these issues."

"Feature-wise, Docker is very user-friendly...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

"I think the best feature is to replicate anything in our local machine using a simple command."

"I think that with Docker, it is easy to deploy it on different platforms."

"Docker is perfect for what I do...The solution is scalable."

More Docker pros

"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

"The most valuable features are troubleshooting and optimizing application performance."

"The features are pretty much ready out of the box."

"The data collection from our VMs, containers, databases, and backend components is valuable."

"It's a very easy-to-use solution."

"We haven't really experienced any glitches or bugs."

"The tool's stability is great."

"The solution monitors attacks or unauthorized access to the information we want to protect."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"Docker volumes. When I integrated volumes, I faced challenges. I have not essentially used add volumes to the existing instances."

"In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved."

"The stability could be improved."

"There may not be much room for improvement with Docker as it has greatly evolved. However, one area that could be improved upon is the documentation on their website which was once easy to follow but has become quite terrible with numerous versions being released. As an example, the installation process for Docker now requires more than just a one-line command, causing inconvenience. Additionally, based on my experience as a college instructor, teaching students to install Docker was a difficult task due to the lack of straightforward and easy-to-follow documentation. Docker should focus on improving their documentation to make it more user-friendly for all."

"Docker can improve the integration with Microsoft Windows. It does not support native installations."

"Owing to a few shortcomings in its stability, I would say that its stability can be improved."

"The learning curve with Docker is huge and extensive"

"Docker management is very difficult when we have a large number of nodes."

More Docker cons

"The solution's stability is an area that has room for improvement. It needs to provide constant stability to its users."

"Primarily, the logs in Splunk APM can be challenging to navigate and comprehend, making it difficult to understand the details within each log. Compared to other tools like LogDNA, which are more intuitive in this aspect, the logs in Splunk APM can require more effort to understand."

"The deployment can be quite complex."

"The cost needs to be re-examined. It's extremely expensive to run. It's also expensive to expand. That's the number one complaint all of my customers have when it comes to Splunk. It's way too expensive compared to other solutions."

"Splunk's functionality could be improved by adding database connectors for other platforms like AWS and Azure."

"Splunk would be better if some tools were integrated to be able to take action on security or network concerns."

"They can get more integration with a few more products. They can also update some of the dashboards that are in there now."

"They need more EDR functionalities."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The current cost for us is nothing as an open source."

"Docker is open source. To use a Docker enterprise model, we would need to pay for it."

"Pricing is based on the number of users."

"The product is not expensive."

"The offering and service are quite free."

"Its convenience edition is free of cost."

"Since Docker is an open-source solution, it is free of cost."

"Docker is a free open-source solution."

More Docker pricing and cost advice

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

"It is expensive."

"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

"Splunk has been fairly expensive, but it has been predictable."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Insurance Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Docker?

We are using Docker to host applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?

I consider Docker's pricing to be affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Docker?

In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available. We sometimes encountered issues in setting up alerts. The custom detector could be m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The main purpose of using Splunk APM is to optimize our application. We use Splunk APM primarily to understand how the application works, how it uses resources, and its response time in connection ...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Docker

Compared 28% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Docker

Compared 18% of the time

Mirantis Container Runtime vs Docker

Compared 14% of the time

Codespaces vs Docker

Compared 13% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Docker

Compared 8% of the time

More Docker Competitors

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 22% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Docker

March 2025

Download Docker product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

March 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Overview

Docker is a versatile container platform used for running and deploying applications in isolated environments, ensuring consistency across development, testing, and production.

Docker offers solutions for containerizing applications, automating deployments, and managing infrastructure through its robust platform. It supports CI/CD workflows, provides a development platform for container management, and simplifies the setup by using streamlined tools. Organizations leverage Docker for building microservices, running UI applications, deploying web services, and setting up secure environments. It also facilitates managing containers via Kubernetes and creating development stacks for enhanced productivity.

What are Docker's key features?

Security: Offers containment and isolation of applications.
Easy Use: Simplifies the deployment and management of applications.
Documentation: Extensive resources to aid in understanding and implementation.
Customization: Flexible environment configurations.
Scalability: Efficiently handles applications irrespective of scale.
Internal DNS: Manages network configurations within the container ecosystem.
Overlay Networks: Facilitates seamless inter-container communication.
Resource Efficiency: Optimizes usage of system resources.

What benefits should users look for?

Consistency: Ensures homogeneous environments across development, testing, and production stages.
Portability: Allows applications to run consistently on any platform.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces overhead costs associated with application deployment.
Speed: Accelerates the build, test, and deployment cycles.
Flexibility: Supports various tools and integrations to adapt to different workflows.

Industries implement Docker for CI/CD pipelines, scaling services, and improving resource utilization. Tech companies use Docker for building and deploying their software in isolated environments. Finance and healthcare sectors deploy applications securely, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. Educational institutions set up consistent development environments for coding labs and training students in advanced technologies.

Docker

Splunk Observability Cloud combines log search, data integration, and dashboards for seamless monitoring, enhancing infrastructure visibility and security. Its cloud integration and scalability support diverse environments, improving operational efficiency.

Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring tools with user-friendly interfaces, enabling end-to-end infrastructure visibility. Its real-time alerting and predictive capabilities enhance security monitoring, while centralized dashboards provide cross-platform visibility. Users benefit from fast data integration and extensive insights into application performance. Despite its advantages, improvements could be made in integration with other tools, data reliability, scalability, and cost management. Users face challenges in configuration complexity and require better automation and endpoint protection features. Enhancing AI integration, alerts, and adaptation for high-throughput services could further improve usability.

What are the key features of Splunk Observability Cloud?

Log Search: Efficiently search and analyze log data for enhanced insights.
Data Integration: Fast integration across platforms for comprehensive visibility.
Custom Dashboards: Powerful and adaptable dashboards for real-time monitoring.
Cloud Integration: Seamless integration with cloud services for scalable solutions.
Application Performance Monitoring: Advanced tools for improving application performance.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Infrastructure Monitoring: Improved visibility and monitoring across infrastructure components.
Operational Efficiency: Enhancements in data analysis lead to efficient operations.
Business Resilience: Supports adaptability and swift responses to changing needs.
Security Management: Enhances threat identification and response through real-time alerts.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting compliance and auditing requirements effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for application performance monitoring and infrastructure metrics. Its ability to track incidents and analyze machine data benefits network infrastructure, while distributed tracing and log analysis aid in tackling security threats. Organizations often integrate it for compliance and auditing purposes, enhancing visibility into network traffic and optimizing performance.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

February 2025

Free Report: Docker vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Docker vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.