Dragos vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention comparison

The compared Dragos and Palo Alto Networks solutions aren't in the same category. Dragos is ranked #5 in OT , and holds a 11.5% mindshare in the category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #6 in ID , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dragos users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Dragos

Read 1 Dragos review

1,965 Views
1,595 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Read 26 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews

2,813 Views
1,841 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Dragos

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dragos and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, CyberArk and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security.

To learn more, read our detailed Operational Technology (OT) Security Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Operational Technology (OT) Security

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,210 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dragos

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Operational Technology (OT) Security (5th)

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. Dragos is designed for Operational Technology (OT) Security and holds a mindshare of 11.5%, down 13.2% compared to last year.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, on the other hand, focuses on Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS), holds 7.4% mindshare, down 8.0% since last year.

Operational Technology (OT) Security

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

MarkLopez

Director of IT at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Centralized management and cybersecurity features enhance IoT device oversight

Dragos ( /products/dragos-reviews ) offers several valuable features, including the capability to manage IoT devices on a centralized platform. It allows for updates to devices and uniform management counsel, enabling updates to all devices. Another key feature is its ability to manage cybersecurity aspects of devices, such as updating or isolating devices found to have vulnerabilities. It includes features for automatic discovery of devices and inventory management of devices, and it facilitates incident response by allowing for isolation or shutdown of devices in case of critical vulnerabilities.

Read full review

Carlos Bracamonte

Senior Network Support Engineer at Amadeus

Robust, reliable, simple to install and good technical support

We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection. I'm not sure what the remaining threat protection features are off the top of my head. But beyond that, we use URL filtering. We have three approved cases for using external dynamic lists that are stored in a bucket repository. Then, for each URL site that needs to be whitelisted, we add it to the external dynamic list in order to gain access to this email. I would like Wildfire to be implemented. We use the equivalent in Cisco is the integration policies. We have the Wildfire but we are not currently implementing it. We don't have the license to use it, but we are not currently implementing it until we present the use cases that the company gives some value to and they approve the use of it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Dragos is more expensive than other vendors, probably about fifteen to twenty percent more, but it is generally worth the investment."

"Edge protection is a valuable feature."

"For those who want a next-gen firewall that's easy to configure and easy to operate, I think you should go for Palo Alto."

"Most of the features of Palo Alto Threat Prevention are alright. I recommend features like content filtering, IP address, & intelligent firewalls. The reporting feature is very good."

"One of the most valuable features is the anti-malware protection."

"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It's quite easy. Deployment took one to two weeks."

"The user interface is a bit more professional than some free products."

"The most valuable feature is its use of machine learning to detect potentially unknown threats."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros

Cons

"Dragos could improve its asset visibility and discovery tools, as the competitor Claroty has better options in this area."

"In Africa, the technical support is probably not as good as in Europe and the USA because it's a specific premium support, partner-enabled premium support and all of that. But it's really good, I don't really have any complaints, it's fairly good. I'll give them 80%."

"The price of licenses should be lowered to make it less costly to scale our solution."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support."

"The application’s pricing and dashboard need improvement. It could be user-friendly."

"Sometimes when you want to group a set of ports, and communicate with Palo Alto, you cannot group TCP and UDP ports together. This needs to be adjusted."

"There is a potential drawback with the lack of support for the ICAP protocol."

"The solution could benefit from improved AI analytics to predict potential attacks before they occur, similar to NDR systems."

"The installation was complicated."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time."

"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."

"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."

"The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."

"If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."

"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."

"It's not too expensive."

"The pricing could be lower."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,210 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

It is a stable product.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

The pricing is competitive, and with current campaigns and discounts, it provides an excellent device for a reasonable price.

See all answers

Comparisons

Nozomi Networks vs Dragos

Compared 35% of the time

Claroty Platform vs Dragos

Compared 28% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Dragos

Compared 13% of the time

Darktrace vs Dragos

Compared 8% of the time

More Dragos Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 16% of the time

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 13% of the time

Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 12% of the time

Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 10% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Operational Technology (OT) Security

April 2025

Download Dragos product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

April 2025

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report

Also Known As

Dragos Platform

No data available

Overview

We provide industrial asset identification, threat detection, and response to help organizations stay ahead of adversaries. The Dragos platform delivers codified industrial cybersecurity expertise that enables security teams to detect and respond faster to industrial cybersecurity threats, reducing dwell time and down time. We enhance ICS defenders’ efficiency and effectiveness via the Dragos platform, Dragos WorldView intelligence reports, and the Dragos Threat Operations Center.

Dragos

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

NaturEner

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

Operational Technology (OT) Security

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, CyberArk and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,210 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.