DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Goliath Performance Monitor comparison

Broadcom and Goliath Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #53 with an average rating of 7.0, while Goliath Technologies is ranked #59. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in IM, compared to Goliath Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Goliath Technologies users who would recommend it.

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 121 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

654 Views
395 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Goliath Performance Monitor

Read 5 Goliath Performance Monitor reviews

416 Views
323 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Goliath Performance Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Goliath Performance Monitor compete in system management and performance monitoring. Goliath Performance Monitor often takes the lead due to its advanced features and deployment simplicity, although DX Unified Infrastructure Management scores higher in pricing and customer support satisfaction.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management provides comprehensive network and server monitoring, automated problem resolution, and wide device support. Goliath Performance Monitor includes detailed application performance tracking, deep insights into performance issues, and granular diagnostic capabilities.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could improve its deployment simplicity, enhance its user interface, and offer more real-time analytics. Goliath Performance Monitor might consider reducing initial costs, expanding integration capabilities, and streamlining its feature set for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Goliath Performance Monitor offers a straightforward deployment process with extensive documentation and consistent customer service. DX Unified Infrastructure Management may involve a more complex deployment but benefits from a supportive customer service platform known for effective resolutions.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is noted for cost-effectiveness and high ROI potential, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Goliath Performance Monitor tends to have a higher setup cost, justified by its advanced features, offering substantial long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

53rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (70th), Server Monitoring (23rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (38th), AIOps (19th)

Goliath Performance Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

59th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Goliath Performance Monitor is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Arunpandiyan M

Senior Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support

There are quite a few manual processes. We've had issues with pulling reports. Sometimes we have trouble or get errors. The reporting process should be easier. If you have a hub, you should be able to have an unlimited number of servers. For example, if you have 500 servers, and the limit is ten, you have to pull 50 reports. We'd like to just pull one report for all servers. This also increases the time to pull reports. If we have to pull more reports, it takes that much longer than just pulling one. The product can be expensive. Right now, they are updating and consolidating the dashboard. I'm expecting an update that will resolve a few glitches in the server.

Read full review

networke29316

Senior Systems Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees

Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive

It looks like it is easy to scale, but I don't know how far it can go out. We are only a 300, or 400 person company. We are not terribly large. It looks like it should be able to scale up until 10,000 at least. There are two users in the company who use this solution, I use it, and the helpdesk.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Monitors the infrastructure asset and also monitors as an IT service."

"It is the foundation for our monitoring solution."

"It is easy to implement."

"It's easy to push out across numerous servers. Very scalable."

"It is easy to implement but requires good planning."

"Easy admin functionality. You can quickly do all the admin functionality without reducing cycles."

"Great out-of-the-box capability."

"It gives us visibility inside applications. It helps us to dig down and find the root cause of any issue within the network."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

"Offers a diversity of features."

"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."

Cons

"The company has not kept pace with developments."

"I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved. The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex. Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive. What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well."

"They need to continue to advance the filter capabilities, and provide more input fields."

"The only challenge that I have with this solution is the reporting part. The users are not really comfortable with the kind of reports they are getting. Sometimes, they want to see reports in their own format. Customizing those reports with Jasper is not very easy. It could be because of the knowledge gap. If you have the knowledge of how Jasper can be configured to suit customer requirements in terms of reporting, it is good. There was a time a customer complained about one issue related to Netflow analysis. Broadcom has a separate model for that, but the customer wanted everything bundled together. It could also have IP management so that I am able to see or analyze IPs so that the IPs that are already in use don't get assigned."

"We would like the navigation of this solution to be more user friendly for our system administrators."

"A useful feature to have would be automatic configuration per standard by new robots that check in for any particular customer."

"Better support and more accessible resources are crucial. Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."

"Stability."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."

"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"Customers pay for the license and the support."

"The price seems reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Healthcare Company

18%

University

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 27% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 24% of the time

Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 16% of the time

Nagios XI vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 16% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

ControlUp vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 100% of the time

More Goliath Performance Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

March 2025

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Goliath Performance Monitor

March 2025

Download Goliath Performance Monitor product report

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

No data available

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

Goliath Performance Monitor offers proactive, end-to-end IT performance monitoring for Citrix & VMware to ensure a positive end user experience. Goliath Performance Monitor provides complete support for monitoring virtual server, virtual desktop and hybrid cloud environments, and provides specialized modules for certain EMR/EHR applications and NVIDIA GRID vGPU. Goliath Performance Monitor has been architected from the ground up to help IT administrators anticipate end user experience issues, troubleshoot the root cause, and deploy remediation actions quickly before end users complain.

Goliath Technologies

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

Walmart, Facebook, Xerox, UHS, ADP, Wyndham Worldwide

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

March 2025

Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.