Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DxEnterprise vs RHEV comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.5
RHEV's customer service receives mixed reviews, with effectiveness varying by expertise; international support is mainly email-based.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.8
RHEV needs improvements in clustering, security, integration, scalability, and usability to compete with VMware, along with better support and pricing.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.6
RHEV is scalable for various loads and users, performing well generally but requires attention to server capacity and applications.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.0
RHEV offers competitive, budget-friendly pricing for server management, although extra support may increase costs for some users.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.7
RHEV is praised for stability and reliability, rated 8-9/10, though some find upgrades complex and less stable than VMware.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization excels in KVM technology, cost-efficiency, stability, scalability, integration, and cloud platform management.
 

Categories and Ranking

DxEnterprise
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
20th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
High Availability Clustering (6th)
RHEV
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
11th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of DxEnterprise is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RHEV is 3.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

BG
Learning curve when moving from PolyServe is very low. I would refrain from using DxTransfer for moving databases & jobs
If you have used PolyServe and are looking for an alternate before it is EOL, I strongly recommend DxConsole. The learning curve for those who have used PolyServe is very low and the system works great. I would refrain from using DxTransfer for moving databases and jobs, but it works nice for moving users. There is a new version of DxTransfer, but we have not had need to use it since we set up our systems. Update - I strongly encourage people to upgrade from DxConsole to DxEnterprise. It works a lot better, is more stable and has much faster failovers. On top of that it has extra features not available in DxConsole.
Sujeet-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution is scalable and affordable, but it lacks features, and it is not easy to manage
Management of RHEV is not as easy as VMware. Some features do not work. The product does not provide features similar to VMware’s VMotion. After creating the cluster, the VM is moved to another node if we move down. However, the VM does not move the parent node automatically. It has to be moved manually. VMware moves it automatically. RHEV moves it to the parent node only if we restart. Everything can be handled in VMware through the GUI. However, in RHEV, some things can be managed through UI, and others cannot. We have to troubleshoot and use CLI. A few features of the product do not work as well as those in VMware.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VL
Jan 13, 2015
vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer
We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
52%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about RHEV?
The initial setup is fairly straightforward and well-documented. The process is very similar to its competitors. The success of your setup depends on how well you plan.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RHEV?
It should be more affordable and available. It should target companies, especially new ones, that need servers with capacities of around 518+ units. It should be priced appropriately because it mig...
What needs improvement with RHEV?
We should improve how we manage storage domains and make more comprehensive control available through the command line. RHEV needs to consider those points that can be integrated. The REST API shou...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

DH2i DxEnterprise
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Asante, Eversheds, Vecima Networks, W&W AFCO Steel, City of Aurora, Menigo, Linn County Sheriff's Office
Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.
Find out what your peers are saying about DxEnterprise vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.