RHEV and KVM compete in the enterprise virtualization category. RHEV appears to have the upper hand in customer service due to better user experiences, though KVM is preferred for its feature-rich offerings, even if perceived as more costly.
Features: RHEV is favored for its integration capabilities, scalability, and prebuilt options, which are beneficial for enterprises with large infrastructures. KVM is appreciated for its open-source flexibility, allowing extensive customization and broad adaptation. Its rich feature set gives users significant control and extendibility.
Room for Improvement: RHEV is often criticized for its complexity, steep learning curve, and the need for more intuitive interfaces. KVM users find room for improvement in its operational intuitiveness, better documentation, and need for smoother integration processes. Despite similar challenges, KVM receives slightly better feedback for ongoing enhancements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RHEV deployment is seen as complex, frequently requiring expert assistance, yet it scores higher in customer service satisfaction with enterprise support. KVM's deployment is easier for self-managed teams due to community support, though professional help can be necessary for complex scenarios.
Pricing and ROI: RHEV's pricing is deemed suitable for its enterprise features, resulting in good ROI for large-scale environments. KVM is initially perceived as costlier but gains favor for its long-term value through open-source benefits and flexibility, providing strong ROI as solutions scale.
Paid support is also obtainable from companies like Red Hat for more critical issues.
In comparison to VMware, which offers a more balanced set of management features, KVM could improve in terms of user-friendly tooling.
Compared to VMware and Microsoft, KVM offers better pricing and licensing options.
The most valuable feature of KVM is its superior real-time performance, which results in lower latency compared to alternatives like VMware and Microsoft.
KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is an open-source virtualization technology that is embedded in Linux. KVM allows users to seamlessly transform their Linux system into a hypervisor that, in turn, will enable a host machine to run numerous, isolated virtual environments or virtual machines (VMs).
KVM is part of Linux. Users with Linux 2.6.20 or newer already have KVM. As KVM is already a component of the current Linux code, it automatically improves with every new Linux fix, feature, or upgrade. So KVM users are always current and up to date.
KVM automatically transforms Linux to a type -1 (bare-metal) hypervisor. All hypervisors need operating system components, such as a process scheduler, I/O stack, device drivers, memory manager, and more, to run a VM. KVM already has these components embedded, as it is part of the Linux kernel. Each VM is generated as a basic Linux proces,s which is maintained by the standard Linux scheduler, with dedicated hardware such as a graphics adapter, memory, disks, network card, and CPUs.
KVM Key Features:
KVM has many valuable key features. Some of its most useful features include:
Reviews from Real Users
“The most helpful aspect of KVM is the fact that the interface is so minimal. It includes just what you need to set up the VMs and manage them, and it's very simple to do so. KVM, as a native virtualization solution, is a complete and fully adequate system for small businesses that need to reduce costs, and also to make maintenance easier. “ - Georges E., Business Engineer and Consultant at All-Tech
“The most valuable feature of KVM is the hypervisor environment and how we can configure it with ease. Additionally, the interface is intuitive.” Sonu S., Senior Solution Architect at Micro Focus
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, or RHEV, is a leading open standard enterprise virtualization management solution. This solution supports virtualization of servers and desktops using the same infrastructure and a single easy-to-use interface.
Because RHEV is based on open standards, it is vendor-independent and a lot more cost effective and flexible than proprietary solutions.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.