RHEV and KVM are competing in the virtualization solutions category, with RHEV being favored for enterprise integration and KVM appreciated for its open-source flexibility. Data comparisons indicate that RHEV provides superior support and integration, while KVM is attractive due to its robust features despite additional complexity or cost.
Features: RHEV offers a comprehensive management interface, strong integration capabilities with Red Hat's professional services, and SELinux for enhanced security. KVM is notable for its lightweight architecture, open-source versatility, and ability to operate across diverse systems with minimal overhead.
Room for Improvement: RHEV could enhance its flexibility and reduce costs to compete better with open-source options. It also needs to improve documentation for non-enterprise users and broaden its compatibility with community-driven innovations. KVM might focus on simplifying its setup process, enhancing its professional support offerings, and providing more intuitive user interfaces for administration tasks.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RHEV simplifies the deployment process with Red Hat's dedicated services, offering enterprise clients a more guided setup. KVM, while less straightforward in deployment, allows for extensive customization and benefits from community support, trading off guided assistance for more flexibility.
Pricing and ROI: RHEV involves higher initial costs, justified by bundled enterprise-grade support and reliable performance, potentially leading to a positive ROI. KVM's lower upfront costs make it appealing for those seeking cost-effective open-source solutions, although achieving ROI may require significant technical expertise.
KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is an open-source virtualization technology that is embedded in Linux. KVM allows users to seamlessly transform their Linux system into a hypervisor that, in turn, will enable a host machine to run numerous, isolated virtual environments or virtual machines (VMs).
KVM is part of Linux. Users with Linux 2.6.20 or newer already have KVM. As KVM is already a component of the current Linux code, it automatically improves with every new Linux fix, feature, or upgrade. So KVM users are always current and up to date.
KVM automatically transforms Linux to a type -1 (bare-metal) hypervisor. All hypervisors need operating system components, such as a process scheduler, I/O stack, device drivers, memory manager, and more, to run a VM. KVM already has these components embedded, as it is part of the Linux kernel. Each VM is generated as a basic Linux proces,s which is maintained by the standard Linux scheduler, with dedicated hardware such as a graphics adapter, memory, disks, network card, and CPUs.
KVM Key Features:
KVM has many valuable key features. Some of its most useful features include:
Reviews from Real Users
“The most helpful aspect of KVM is the fact that the interface is so minimal. It includes just what you need to set up the VMs and manage them, and it's very simple to do so. KVM, as a native virtualization solution, is a complete and fully adequate system for small businesses that need to reduce costs, and also to make maintenance easier. “ - Georges E., Business Engineer and Consultant at All-Tech
“The most valuable feature of KVM is the hypervisor environment and how we can configure it with ease. Additionally, the interface is intuitive.” Sonu S., Senior Solution Architect at Micro Focus
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, or RHEV, is a leading open standard enterprise virtualization management solution. This solution supports virtualization of servers and desktops using the same infrastructure and a single easy-to-use interface.
Because RHEV is based on open standards, it is vendor-independent and a lot more cost effective and flexible than proprietary solutions.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.