Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs RHEV comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.6
Nutanix AHV Virtualization support is praised for efficiency, expertise, proactive monitoring, and high customer satisfaction despite occasional delays.
Sentiment score
6.5
RHEV's customer service receives mixed reviews, with effectiveness varying by expertise; international support is mainly email-based.
They provide prompt and quality responses.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.7
Nutanix AHV needs better application redeployment, support, compatibility, GUI usability, pricing, integration, flexibility, and cloud technology support.
Sentiment score
4.8
RHEV needs improvements in clustering, security, integration, scalability, and usability to compete with VMware, along with better support and pricing.
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Nutanix AHV Virtualization offers scalable, flexible infrastructure with high ratings, though may pose cost challenges for small companies.
Sentiment score
7.6
RHEV is scalable for various loads and users, performing well generally but requires attention to server capacity and applications.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.4
Nutanix AHV offers cost-effective virtualization with no licensing fees, competitive pricing, and strong integration and features compared to competitors.
Sentiment score
6.0
RHEV offers competitive, budget-friendly pricing for server management, although extra support may increase costs for some users.
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is praised for its stability, reliability, and effective Life Cycle Manager, despite minor compatibility concerns.
Sentiment score
7.7
RHEV is praised for stability and reliability, rated 8-9/10, though some find upgrades complex and less stable than VMware.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Nutanix AHV provides user-friendly virtualization with integration, security, customization, and centralized control, appealing to tech-savvy users.
Sentiment score
8.3
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization excels in KVM technology, cost-efficiency, stability, scalability, integration, and cloud platform management.
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
 

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
RHEV
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is 8.7%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RHEV is 3.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

Atif Najam - PeerSpot reviewer
Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive
Many backup solutions that we use today are available for purchase, be it IBM, VMware, Veritas, or anything else. They usually have very good vSphere and Hyper-V support. Because there isn't much AHV deployment in place, we typically have issues with the integrations that AHV has with backup solutions. We would like to see AHV's backup solution integration improved so that we can take VM-level backups directly from Nutanix. The issue is that it provides a higher VM level for VMware and other areas. When it comes to AHV, however, you must purchase a separate set of third-party software, which can then supplement that backup via your IBM Spectrum Protect Plus. One issue we frequently encounter when using AHV is that if you want to install specific software, you must first gain compatibility. If you want to install an operating system, or OS, on top of your AHV, only a few operating systems are supported. That is one area where I would like to see some progress. VMware typically supports almost all of our systems, as does Hyper-V, but when it comes to AHV, we must apply specific patches in order to run it on top of AHV. Operating system support must be improved out of the box. If you want to install software, you must first ensure that it is compatible with Nutanix AHV; not all software is compatible. It is not possible to integrate it with everything. There is limited compatibility with the software that can be installed on top of Nutanix AHV, for example. If you want to install a specific operating system, you must first check to see if it is listed in the compatibility list; only then will you be able to install it, and that is one issue for now.
Sujeet-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution is scalable and affordable, but it lacks features, and it is not easy to manage
Management of RHEV is not as easy as VMware. Some features do not work. The product does not provide features similar to VMware’s VMotion. After creating the cluster, the VM is moved to another node if we move down. However, the VM does not move the parent node automatically. It has to be moved manually. VMware moves it automatically. RHEV moves it to the parent node only if we restart. Everything can be handled in VMware through the GUI. However, in RHEV, some things can be managed through UI, and others cannot. We have to troubleshoot and use CLI. A few features of the product do not work as well as those in VMware.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VL
Jan 13, 2015
vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer
We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
30%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
52%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Nutanix AHV compare with VMware vSphere?
To understand which is better - Nutanix AHV or VMware vSphere - you need to do a product comparison. Both products support hypervisors. However, Nutanix supports some of the most popular ones and m...
What do you like most about Nutanix AHV Virtualization?
Integration is the most valuable feature of the product.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix AHV Virtualization?
The setup cost for four nodes was about $200,000 (in US currency). The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
What do you like most about RHEV?
The initial setup is fairly straightforward and well-documented. The process is very similar to its competitors. The success of your setup depends on how well you plan.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RHEV?
It should be more affordable and available. It should target companies, especially new ones, that need servers with capacities of around 518+ units. It should be priced appropriately because it mig...
What needs improvement with RHEV?
We should improve how we manage storage domains and make more comprehensive control available through the command line. RHEV needs to consider those points that can be integrated. The REST API shou...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.