Hyper-V and Nutanix AHV Virtualization compete in enterprise virtualization solutions. Hyper-V seems to offer better affordability and established integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, whereas Nutanix AHV excels in management simplicity and integration of storage and compute.
Features: Hyper-V offers live migration, dynamic memory allocation, and Hyper-V Replica, which can replace SANs. Nutanix AHV seamlessly integrates storage and compute services, is praised for its ease of management, and includes built-in disaster recovery options.
Room for Improvement: Hyper-V struggles with high CPU and memory consumption and lacks some advanced virtualization features. It also presents complications in networking and storage configuration. AHV needs better support for Red Hat solutions, third-party applications, and improved backup solution integration, limiting its flexibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyper-V integrates smoothly with Windows Server, easing deployment in Microsoft environments. Nutanix AHV features a user-friendly setup and scaling process. Hyper-V's customer support is inconsistent, whereas Nutanix's support is generally more reliable and responsive.
Pricing and ROI: Hyper-V is cost-effective, particularly for users in Microsoft environments, thanks to its bundling with Windows Server. Nutanix AHV is free for existing Nutanix users but can be costly with feature scaling and license renewals. Nevertheless, it offers good ROI for comprehensive needs through its bundled infrastructure solutions.
Technical support from Microsoft is excellent, rated ten out of ten.
The technical support for Hyper-V is excellent
The technical support is very good
They provide prompt and quality responses.
The scalability of Hyper-V is great; I would rate it nine out of ten.
Hyper V can support over two hundred virtual processors and around 12 TB of memory.
We can scale our systems easily without any downtime, making it a highly effective solution for dynamic environments.
Automation is unavailable, and reporting is difficult.
Frequent Windows updates can impact stability compared to VMware ESXi.
The solution is very stable.
Issues such as patch delays and the OVF format challenge affect its stability rating.
Hyper-V could be improved by implementing the same set of features that other tools provide.
Hyper-V should ensure the features of VMware are covered within its platform.
Hyper-V should improve features such as Quality of Service enhancements and VLAN management.
This delay in patching creates risk, especially for government projects that require timely updates.
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
Hyper-V is completely free and requires no licensing fee.
Until 2019, Hyper-V was a cost-effective solution because it was available as a free product.
Hyper-V's licensing costs are lower compared to VMware, making it cost-effective for smaller workloads.
This has been advantageous as it does not require additional licensing costs for the hypervisor, contributing to overall cost savings.
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
It is completely free, which is a significant advantage.
I find the quick provision feature in Hyper-V to be extremely helpful.
It offers the stability needed for non-enterprise data centers and has improved over time.
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
Hyper-V is a hardware virtualization tool that allows users to create virtual computer environments with multiple operating systems on a single physical server. Each virtual machine has computer parts, such as memory, processor, storage, and networking, and acts like a standard computer - running its own operating system and software programs. Each component of the virtual machine can be configured to meet your specific requirements.
Hyper-V creates a cost-effective, stable, and productive server virtualization environment by running multiple operating systems, such as Windows, Linux, and more, in parallel on one machine or server. Each virtual machine runs in its own isolated space, which means you can run many virtual machines simultaneously but independently of each other. This helps prevent problems such as a crash affecting the other workloads and enables different users to separately access various systems.
Benefits of Hyper-V
Hyper-V key features:.
Reviews from Real Users
Hyper-V stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its flexibility, its replication capabilities, and the fact that its virtual machines utilize a small amount of resources..
Liam L., the owner of a tech services company, writes, “It is actually very low on resources. It doesn't use many resources. It is also very easy to tailor. You can change things like the amount of memory and storage on the fly. It is very stable and reliable. I like its replication feature, which is very good. It is also very easy to move the virtual machines across push servers without any difficulty. Its performance is also very good. Now with this pandemic, a lot of workers are working from home. A lot of workers have been using laptops as their desktop computers, and they would remote into a virtual PC. There is no difficulty, and they can't tell the difference between this and the real one. It is much easier to manage.”
Kevin E. an IT director at Homeland Technology Group, LLC, notes, “We've probably seen a 50 percent speed increase on our SQL server. Hyper-V has also significantly reduced our downtimes with faster boot-up and reboot. If we have to reboot a server, there is maybe two or three minutes of downtime. When we were on a bare-metal server, it could be five to ten minutes due to the total boot time.”
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
