Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix XenServer vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization comparison

Citrix and Nutanix are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Citrix is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while Nutanix is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8. Citrix holds a 5.1% mindshare in SVS, compared to Nutanix’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.
Citrix XenServer
Read 47 Citrix XenServer reviews
  • 9,106 Views
  • 6,440 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Read 53 Nutanix AHV Virtualization reviews
  • 14,492 Views
  • 9,541 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Citrix XenServer and Nutanix AHV compete in the virtualization category, with each product offering distinct advantages. Citrix XenServer seems to hold an edge with its comprehensive free edition and broad Windows support, while Nutanix AHV excels in storage integration and cost efficiency.

Features: Citrix XenServer offers a full-featured free edition, real-time performance monitoring, and strong support for Windows management via XenCenter. It also provides advanced capabilities like hot-swappable components and compatibility with various clouds. Nutanix AHV is known for its integration of storage and compute services, user-centric design, and automation features. It provides a simplified management experience through the Prism console and does not require licensing costs.

Room for Improvement: Citrix XenServer needs enhanced high-availability and clustering options, a more flexible update process, and expanded support for Linux guests. There is also room for better integration with third-party backup solutions and a more detailed self-service user portal. Nutanix AHV could improve in orchestration, automation, and response times for technical support. Enhanced integration with legacy systems and third-party software, alongside management console enhancements, are desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix XenServer offers ease of deployment and community-driven support with optional paid assistance. However, users sometimes find it difficult to obtain help due to a limited number of Citrix partners. Nutanix AHV, being open-source, avoids licensing issues, with users praising quick support resolution capabilities, although improvements in accessibility and support efficiency are needed.

Pricing and ROI: Citrix XenServer's advantage is its free version, suitable for small-scale use, though transitioning to paid versions can be costly. The benefits of virtualization are valued despite high licensing costs for advanced features. Nutanix AHV offers a free hypervisor bundled with Nutanix's platform, leading to cost savings through integrated features like de-duplication without added licensing fees. Although it has higher initial costs, its ROI potential makes it competitive for businesses seeking comprehensive solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Citrix XenServer vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 823,795 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Citrix XenServer support is praised for expertise and quick resolutions, but some find it slower than VMware with limited direct access.
Sentiment score
8.6
Nutanix AHV Virtualization support is praised for efficiency, expertise, proactive monitoring, and high customer satisfaction despite occasional delays.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.5
Citrix XenServer faces challenges with usability, third-party integration, high-availability, and flexibility, needing better support and management tools.
Sentiment score
4.7
Nutanix AHV needs better application redeployment, support, compatibility, GUI usability, pricing, integration, flexibility, and cloud technology support.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Citrix XenServer offers scalability, supports diverse business sizes, seamless upgrades, and user-friendly management despite some storage concerns.
Sentiment score
8.4
Nutanix AHV Virtualization offers scalable, flexible infrastructure with high ratings, though may pose cost challenges for small companies.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
Citrix XenServer offers a free solution with optional paid features, viewed variably as affordable or costly, yet competitive.
Sentiment score
6.4
Nutanix AHV offers cost-effective virtualization with no licensing fees, competitive pricing, and strong integration and features compared to competitors.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Citrix XenServer is praised for strong stability, with minimal issues, good support, and reliability, especially with regular updates.
Sentiment score
8.6
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is praised for its stability, reliability, and effective Life Cycle Manager, despite minor compatibility concerns.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Citrix XenServer offers robust virtualization with strong security, easy management, cost-effectiveness, and supports various operating systems and storage.
Sentiment score
8.4
Nutanix AHV provides user-friendly virtualization with integration, security, customization, and centralized control, appealing to tech-savvy users.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
 

Categories and Ranking

Citrix XenServer
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Citrix XenServer is 5.1%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is 8.7%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

Siva Kuppala - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows us to allocate CPU, memory, storage, and network resources across VMs and minimizes downtime in case of hardware failure or maintenance
It is a scalable product and provides great benefits for virtualization needs. However, there are a few considerations: * Cost: Citrix Hypervisor can be fairly expensive. * Complexity: There's a learning curve, especially for those coming from a Microsoft background. Setting it up and managing it can introduce some complexity. * Hardware Support: Not all major hardware vendors fully support Citrix Hypervisor. * Third-party Integration: Integrating Hypervisor with other technologies within a large ecosystem can sometimes be challenging. * Community Support: Compared to solutions like Microsoft Hyper-V, the community support for Citrix Hypervisor is somewhat less extensive. It is not vast. If there are any issues or errors, the community support is not that good. Those are definitely important disadvantages.
Read full review
Atif Najam - PeerSpot reviewer
Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive
Many backup solutions that we use today are available for purchase, be it IBM, VMware, Veritas, or anything else. They usually have very good vSphere and Hyper-V support. Because there isn't much AHV deployment in place, we typically have issues with the integrations that AHV has with backup solutions. We would like to see AHV's backup solution integration improved so that we can take VM-level backups directly from Nutanix. The issue is that it provides a higher VM level for VMware and other areas. When it comes to AHV, however, you must purchase a separate set of third-party software, which can then supplement that backup via your IBM Spectrum Protect Plus. One issue we frequently encounter when using AHV is that if you want to install specific software, you must first gain compatibility. If you want to install an operating system, or OS, on top of your AHV, only a few operating systems are supported. That is one area where I would like to see some progress. VMware typically supports almost all of our systems, as does Hyper-V, but when it comes to AHV, we must apply specific patches in order to run it on top of AHV. Operating system support must be improved out of the box. If you want to install software, you must first ensure that it is compatible with Nutanix AHV; not all software is compatible. It is not possible to integrate it with everything. There is limited compatibility with the software that can be installed on top of Nutanix AHV, for example. If you want to install a specific operating system, you must first check to see if it is listed in the compatibility list; only then will you be able to install it, and that is one issue for now.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VL
Jan 13, 2015
vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer
We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
53%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Educational Organization
30%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Hypervisor?
The core function enables multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server. This maximizes hardware utilization and efficiency.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Hypervisor?
I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with one being very inexpensive and ten being very expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Citrix Hypervisor?
It would be very helpful if I could browse the data store directly in the GUI, similar to VMware and Hyper-V. This feature would be particularly useful when something goes wrong with a virtual mach...
See all answers
How does Nutanix AHV compare with VMware vSphere?
To understand which is better - Nutanix AHV or VMware vSphere - you need to do a product comparison. Both products support hypervisors. However, Nutanix supports some of the most popular ones and m...
See all answers
What do you like most about Nutanix AHV Virtualization?
Integration is the most valuable feature of the product.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix AHV Virtualization?
The setup cost for four nodes was about $200,000 (in US currency). The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 36% of the time
VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer Logo
VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 24% of the time
Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 21% of the time
KVM vs Citrix XenServer Logo
KVM vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 7% of the time
Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 4% of the time
More Citrix XenServer Competitors
Proxmox VE vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization Logo
Proxmox VE vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Compared 29% of the time
Hyper-V vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization Logo
Hyper-V vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Compared 27% of the time
KVM vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization Logo
KVM vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Compared 19% of the time
VMware vSphere vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization Logo
VMware vSphere vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Compared 12% of the time
RHEV vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization Logo
RHEV vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Compared 3% of the time
More Nutanix AHV Virtualization Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer
December 2024
Citrix XenServer reportDownload Citrix XenServer product report
Buyer's Guide
Nutanix AHV Virtualization
November 2024
Nutanix AHV Virtualization reportDownload Nutanix AHV Virtualization product report
 

Also Known As

Hypervisor
No data available
 

Learn More

Citrix
Nutanix
 

Overview

Citrix XenServer is a virtualization platform used in industries such as banking, automotive, and data applications for cloud automation, server virtualization, and VDI scenarios. It supports infrastructure management, virtual machine hosting, and enterprise software deployment, reducing costs by migrating from other platforms.

As a virtualization tool, Citrix XenServer stands out for its ease of maintenance, support, scalability, and centralized management. Commonly deployed on-premises and in data centers, it provides real-time monitoring, live migration, and strong security features. With compatibility across many operating systems, users benefit from a Windows-based management interface that is easy to install and navigate. Integration capabilities with active directory, storage, and load balancing contribute to resource optimization and reliability.

What are the key features of Citrix XenServer?
  • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces operational expenses across IT environments.
  • High Performance: Real-time monitoring and live migration support high efficiency.
  • Security: Strong safeguards protect data and processes.
  • Management Interface: Windows-based, offering user-friendly controls.
  • OS Compatibility: Works with a range of operating systems for flexibility.
  • Advanced Integrations: Active directory, storage, and load balancing maximize resources.
What benefits should users consider in Citrix XenServer reviews?
  • Scalability: Easily adapts to growing demands.
  • Ease of Deployment: Streamlines the installation process for quick setup.
  • Comprehensive Virtualization: Offers extensive capabilities for seamless operations.
  • Centralized Management: Facilitates control through XenCenter.

Implementation in banking, automotive, and data applications leverages Citrix XenServer's strengths in cloud automation and virtualization. Organizations manage resources, deploy services, and ensure stable operations within their infrastructure. The platform is used both on-premises and in data centers, aiding in areas such as cost reduction and maintenance efficiency.

Nutanix AHV is a secure, enterprise-grade solution for intuitive virtualization and container management. It streamlines operations and simplifies management for all your workloads and environments.
 

Sample Customers

U.S. Army Shared Services Center, SoftLayer, Educational Services of America, Independent Bank, and SK Telecom.
JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization
December 2024
Free Report: Citrix XenServer vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix XenServer vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Citrix XenServer vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.