ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Sophos SafeGuard comparison

"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."

"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is its rate of capturing viruses and malware."

"The most valuable feature is that everything is done on the server."

"This solution can be centrally managed."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The tool does not slow down the computer."

"The solution's UI is user-friendly. Even a non-technical person can use it."

"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is the high level of encryption protection."

"The solution has done a fabulous job of protecting us from threats."

"I like that Sophos SafeGuard provides excellent technical support."

"The monitoring features are easy to use."

"Sophos SafeGuard is very easy to implement, and the connection for remote users is beneficial."

"What I love most about Sophos SafeGuard is its user-friendly interface. My company has another software with a complex user interface versus Sophos SafeGuard, which is extremely easy to use."

"The setup process is straightforward."

"I like its ease of use the most. The management console is really nice. I like having one pane of glass that does everything. It does the Sophos anti-virus and encryption. Everything that you need is in one place. It is easy to use, and it is also pretty fast. It provides some pretty good details, and it lets you know who has access to a file. You can also add additional people to the encrypted documents, which is pretty good. Its stability and performance are also very good."

"It's the best solution on the market."

"Sometimes the server console is very slow, so the performance could be improved."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption needs to improve pricing and security."

"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."

"Integration with central management needs improvement."

"The product should be more responsive regarding feedback if it detects something in our infrastructure. I believe there's a backend that their engineers use to detect viruses in our system. We would appreciate it if they could promptly provide feedback and give us recommendations on how to better protect our infrastructure beyond their system. Additionally, we hope for improved integration with the other systems we currently use. It would be beneficial if they could collaborate to create something that facilitates integration between these systems."

"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."

"From an admin perspective, the solution's UI could be more user-friendly."

"There should be more frequent updates."

"Sophos SafeGuard is a German product. Sophos isn't really active in Europe. The Middle East, Africa, South Africa works with Sophos but their primary users aren't in Europe. They should market and push this solution to the European market."

"The product's initial setup process could be easier to understand for new users."

"The solution lacks direct connectivity to Azure AD."

"The dashboards lack sufficient information."

"If it's possible, they should make all the features available because it's got a lot of features on offer, but you have to buy the license in order to add those features to the normal Endpoint. If they could make all those features available and/or offer a bundling option it would be better."

"The Office 360 integration could be improved."

"Sometimes, when the product has a firmware upgrade, we encounter implementation problems, which can delay the connection and require a reset and reinstallation. It has been a persistent issue with Sophos SafeGuard."

"Once you lock a server, you won't be able to install or put something on that particular server, but on the PC or machines, the lockdown feature is not there, and it is a query our company raised when we had to provide details for Sophos' review."

"We paid for an annual subscription, and it was reasonable."

"It is neither very expensive, nor cheap. Overall it is affordable and there is a long term arrangement between our company and the solution providers for license."

"There are some inexpensive products compared to ESET Endpoint Encryption, but they lack the essential features."

"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and could be more cost-effective."

"The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption is moderately priced."

"Instead of installing ESET on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely. This has been a time saver for us."

"The pricing is good and now they offer three year and five year plans. After that if one lokes the service they can choose the lifetime service."

"The platform is reasonably priced considering its functionality and adaptability. It is subscription-based."

"We pay around $10 a year for each endpoint, including support."

"The licenses are dependant on the number of users and computers you have to protect."

"We used it for three years. It costs about 1000 ZAR. Maintenance was part of it, so we don't have extra cost. On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the solution's pricing a three."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing could be better."

"It would be great if the price of the solution was lower than the current price. If we are to sell this particular solution to smaller businesses and not just enterprise businesses it needs to be lower."

"We have a yearly license with Sophos which is around $1000-$1200 or so per annum. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."