Evanios vs HPE OneView comparison

Evanios and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Evanios is ranked #67, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #30 with an average rating of 7.8. Evanios holds a 0.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Evanios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Evanios

Read 6 Evanios reviews

178 Views
113 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Read 81 HPE OneView reviews

2,431 Views
1,725 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Evanios

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Evanios compete in IT infrastructure management. HPE OneView often has an advantage due to its comprehensive management capabilities, while Evanios’s advanced monitoring features are highly valued.

Features: HPE OneView integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructures, offers robust automation, and features a centralized management platform. Evanios provides sophisticated event management, integrates well with IT service management tools, and excels in event correlation.

Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could improve on its pricing model, enhance its analytics functionalities, and refine its alert systems. Evanios may benefit from reducing complexity in initial setup, offering more intuitive dashboards, and improving scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE OneView boasts a straightforward deployment process supported by extensive resources, which aids smooth integration. Evanios offers flexible deployment but may require more customization. HPE OneView’s customer service is often noted for its efficiency, while Evanios focuses on personalized support with customizable solutions.

Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView's competitive pricing offers ROI through reduced management time and improved visibility. Evanios requires a higher initial investment due to its feature set but justifies costs with operational efficiency and reduced downtime.

To learn more, read our detailed Evanios vs. HPE OneView Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Evanios vs. HPE OneView

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Evanios

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

67th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (18th), IT Operations Analytics (17th)

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Evanios is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.5%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

it_user592602

Works at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

The vendor is willing to work with us and develop solutions for products they did not already have an integration for.

As with any new software implementation, during the integration we found a couple of minor issues when integrating certain products (such as SCOM). However, each time this happened Evanios was very quick to identify the bug we were seeing, patch it and provide the new update set for us to install. Also, during the evaluation of Evanios we found that they already had integrations with most of our larger monitoring tools, however they also stated that they would be able to create update sets to integrate certain products we used that they did not currently support. This proved to be very valuable for us because they were able to become an even better fit for our organization by creating update sets\integrations for PRTG, Quest Foglight, TIBCO and Thousand Eyes as well.

Read full review

Trevor Watkins

Server Applications Senior Administrator at Home Hardware Stores Limited

Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO

I've been involved in various upgrades. It's pretty easy to set up with vCenter. We just push out an appliance template in vCenter. We run ours on virtual servers. Deployment can be done by just one person. The number of people needed for maintenance will depend on your server inventory. If you have more than 100 servers, you will need three to five people. If you have 500 to 1,000 servers, you will need a team of 10 to 20 people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provided up to a 90% noise reduction in some our noisy monitoring tools."

"The ability to manipulate events via JavaScript getting the exact data that we want."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you might have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops."

"The initial setup is easy."

"Firmware compliance is one of the most valuable features."

"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."

"Provides the strongest support for automation."

"We have the dashboard up on a big screen, and you can actually see when things go wrong or if there are any faults with any of the servers. The backup is automated as well, so the appliance is quite good."

"I don't have to use CD-ROMs or anything like that to provision the servers."

"Gives the business interfaces to view real-time pictures of IT business services."

"Gives us one platform to monitor and access or configure all the servers or the 3PAR, etc."

More HPE OneView pros

Cons

"We would like the ability to have an "exit" option for events when they are being processed."

"The price could be cheaper."

"More complex correlation rules would be nice. The ability to clearly define a parent event in a correlation and nested correlations, specifically."

"Sometimes the interface can be a little confusing, sometimes the error messages can be very cryptic, as far as what's actually going on."

"Technical support is not very good. The engineers do not know a lot about the product, even when asked simplistic questions."

"I had some minor difficulties with upgrading, but the solution still works fine."

"Specifically, it would be great if we had the ability to reapply the server profile faster."

"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."

"The tool doesn't send automated alerts via email...We should be able to receive notification emails when a server or hardware issue arises, which would be helpful if someone is unavailable in the office."

"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."

"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."

More HPE OneView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Use it. It is free."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"I am happy with the price."

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about HPE OneView?

The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

The product does not work well. The logs are not proper.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

HPE OneView is a management interface to manage hardware in a VMware environment. It is used for managing different servers and pushing out the firmware and operating software. I use HPE OneView fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 14% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 14% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs HPE OneView

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs HPE OneView

Compared 9% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Evanios

February 2025

Download Evanios product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

February 2025

Download HPE OneView product report

Also Known As

No data available

HP OneView

Overview

A key component of the Event Management process is consolidation of events from across the enterprise. By consolidating disparate events into a single solution, they can be de-duplicated and correlated. For example, network failure events can be correlated with system failures, and then prioritized based on service impact.

Reduce the noise

Evanios Integrations allows filtering and processing close to the event source, keeping the weight off of the ServiceNow system for increased performance. Filters are easily configured. EVA, the Evanios consolidation point also has built in event flood control features, to protect against unexpected event storms which can quickly overload traditional integrations.

Evanios

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Buyer's Guide

Evanios vs. HPE OneView

January 2025

Free Report: Evanios vs. HPE OneView

Find out what your peers are saying about Evanios vs. HPE OneView and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Evanios vs. HPE OneView report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.