Discover the top alternatives and competitors to HPE OneView based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Zabbix, and New Relic.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Datadog offers comprehensive monitoring and integration, appealing to tech buyers focused on software capabilities. In comparison, HPE OneView excels in hardware management for those prioritizing infrastructure control. Datadog’s flexible cloud deployment contrasts with HPE OneView’s strong on-premises solutions.
Datadog has a straightforward setup process with predictable fees, whereas HPE OneView requires a higher initial investment and more complex configuration.
Datadog has a straightforward setup process with predictable fees, whereas HPE OneView requires a higher initial investment and more complex configuration.
Zabbix provides open-source monitoring with features like network discovery and strong alerting, suitable for cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, HPE OneView offers centralized management for HPE hardware, benefiting organizations focused on automation and integration within the HPE ecosystem.
Zabbix is cost-effective with lower setup expenses, while HPE OneView tends to be more expensive to implement initially, highlighting a significant difference in their upfront investment requirements.
Zabbix is cost-effective with lower setup expenses, while HPE OneView tends to be more expensive to implement initially, highlighting a significant difference in their upfront investment requirements.
HPE OneView excels in hardware management with automation features and hybrid support, appealing to those focusing on physical infrastructure. In comparison, New Relic provides strong application performance monitoring with real-time insights and cloud integration, making it ideal for enhancing software efficiency.
HPE OneView offers a straightforward setup with competitive upfront costs, while New Relic provides a more intricate installation process that could lead to higher initial expenses. These differences impact overall budget considerations for prospective users.
HPE OneView offers a straightforward setup with competitive upfront costs, while New Relic provides a more intricate installation process that could lead to higher initial expenses. These differences impact overall budget considerations for prospective users.
SolarWinds NPM offers powerful network monitoring with vendor support and customizable alerts, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, HPE OneView focuses on consolidating physical infrastructure management, making it appealing for organizations prioritizing centralized server and hardware management with HPE solutions.
SolarWinds NPM features a lower setup cost compared to HPE OneView, which may impact initial budgeting considerations. The price difference highlights a potential factor for decision-making based on immediate cost requirements.
SolarWinds NPM features a lower setup cost compared to HPE OneView, which may impact initial budgeting considerations. The price difference highlights a potential factor for decision-making based on immediate cost requirements.
PRTG Network Monitor offers quick deployment, user-friendliness, scalability, and cost-effective monitoring. In comparison, HPE OneView provides centralized infrastructure management, integrating seamlessly within HPE systems for efficient operations. Tech buyers might choose PRTG for its adaptability or HPE for comprehensive HPE-centric management.
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is often deemed lower than HPE OneView, highlighting a cost-effective edge for budget-conscious users, while HPE OneView offers a more comprehensive setup at a higher initial expense.
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is often deemed lower than HPE OneView, highlighting a cost-effective edge for budget-conscious users, while HPE OneView offers a more comprehensive setup at a higher initial expense.
Nagios XI's extensible architecture and community support cater to customizable monitoring needs. In comparison, HPE OneView’s centralized management simplifies server, storage, and networking oversight. Nagios appeals with cost-effective open-source alternatives, while HPE OneView is chosen for its comprehensive infrastructure management capabilities despite higher costs.
HPE OneView excels in automation, easing IT management with centralized control and rapid server deployment. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management enhances enterprise management through AI insights, offering scalable solutions ideal for hybrid clouds. Both solutions present unique advantages catering to different IT needs.
HPE OneView excels in centralized management for HPE environments with time-saving automation. In comparison, LogicMonitor offers robust customization and flexible monitoring across diverse IT setups. A tech buyer might choose OneView for seamless HPE integration, while LogicMonitor provides impressive versatility and adaptability.
HPE OneView's setup costs are lower, making it an affordable choice, while LogicMonitor has higher setup costs but offers more advanced features that some users might find valuable.
HPE OneView's setup costs are lower, making it an affordable choice, while LogicMonitor has higher setup costs but offers more advanced features that some users might find valuable.
Centreon offers scalability and visualization across diverse environments, emphasizing flexibility. In comparison, HPE OneView excels in HPE hardware management, focusing on streamlined automation and integration. Centreon appeals to those needing open-source cost-effectiveness, while OneView targets efficient HPE equipment management.
Centreon typically requires a lower initial setup cost compared to HPE OneView, which involves higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive infrastructure management features.
Centreon typically requires a lower initial setup cost compared to HPE OneView, which involves higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive infrastructure management features.
Icinga offers open-source flexibility and customization, attracting those who prioritize tailored configurations. In comparison, HPE OneView focuses on streamlined integration, appealing to enterprises seeking centralized management and automation. Icinga’s cost-effective model suits smaller entities, while HPE OneView benefits large-scale infrastructures.
Icinga's setup cost is lower, making it more budget-friendly, while HPE OneView offers a more comprehensive setup experience reflecting its premium pricing.
Icinga's setup cost is lower, making it more budget-friendly, while HPE OneView offers a more comprehensive setup experience reflecting its premium pricing.
HPE OneView offers centralized management and comprehensive control over hardware infrastructure. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in cloud integration and automation across hybrid environments. Both emphasize operational efficiencies and cost-effectiveness, addressing different priorities for tech buyers.
HPE OneView displays lower setup costs compared to Cisco Intersight, providing a cost-effective entry for businesses. Cisco Intersight's setup is more costly, reflecting its advanced cloud-based capabilities.
HPE OneView displays lower setup costs compared to Cisco Intersight, providing a cost-effective entry for businesses. Cisco Intersight's setup is more costly, reflecting its advanced cloud-based capabilities.
HPE OneView focuses on automation and centralized management, appealing for physical and virtual environments. In comparison, OpsRamp creates dashboards and provides alerting, emphasizing integration and AIOps. Tech buyers may choose HPE for streamlined management, while OpsRamp offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities.
HPE OneView has a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, while OpsRamp requires a more complex initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in setup expenses between the two solutions.
HPE OneView has a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, while OpsRamp requires a more complex initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in setup expenses between the two solutions.
WhatsUp Gold attracts tech buyers with its affordable pricing and ease of deployment, ideal for small to medium enterprises. In comparison, HPE OneView suits complex environments with its strong integration and automation capabilities, appealing to large-scale data centers seeking infrastructure efficiency.
WhatsUp Gold offers a lower setup cost with straightforward installation, while HPE OneView has a higher initial investment due to its comprehensive infrastructure management features.
WhatsUp Gold offers a lower setup cost with straightforward installation, while HPE OneView has a higher initial investment due to its comprehensive infrastructure management features.
HPE OneView provides robust automation and single-pane management for HPE environments. In comparison, Huawei eSight emphasizes ease of monitoring Huawei devices. Users may choose HPE for automation across systems, while Huawei appeals with cost-effective, straightforward monitoring tailored to Huawei products.
HPE OneView presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced capabilities, while Huawei eSight offers a more budget-friendly option with potentially fewer features.
HPE OneView presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced capabilities, while Huawei eSight offers a more budget-friendly option with potentially fewer features.
HPE OneView provides robust automation and time-saving management features appealing to businesses seeking enhanced control. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager delivers flexibility with strong server management and configuration capabilities, making it an attractive option for those prioritizing equipment management flexibility and comprehensive infrastructure oversight.
HPE OneView generally features a more straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco UCS Manager often involves a more complex initial configuration. Users frequently notice a higher level of customization available with Cisco UCS Manager compared to HPE OneView.
HPE OneView generally features a more straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco UCS Manager often involves a more complex initial configuration. Users frequently notice a higher level of customization available with Cisco UCS Manager compared to HPE OneView.
HPE OneView offers cost-effective comprehensive device management and automation tools, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Dell CloudIQ, with its predictive analytics and cloud integration, attracts those seeking strategic insights and remote accessibility, offsetting higher initial costs with its potential for enhanced long-term value.
HPE OneView excels in integration with existing IT systems, simplifying management via automation. In comparison, OP5 Monitor offers advanced monitoring with detailed analytics. Buyers seeking seamless integration might choose HPE, while those desiring deep insights could prefer OP5 Monitor.
XClarity Orchestrator provides a single interface to monitor and manage all devices (including chassis, servers, switches, and storage) that are managed through an existing resource manager.
ManageEngine IT360 appeals to budget-conscious organizations with its cost-effective monitoring for mid-sized enterprises. In comparison, HPE OneView, designed for large-scale IT setups, justifies its higher price with advanced automation and configuration features appealing to those seeking expansive functionality.
ManageEngine IT360 generally presents a lower setup cost, while HPE OneView is known for its comparatively higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in initial investment between the two IT management solutions.
ManageEngine IT360 generally presents a lower setup cost, while HPE OneView is known for its comparatively higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in initial investment between the two IT management solutions.
