HPE OneView vs Icinga comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Icinga are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7, while Icinga is ranked #47. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Icinga’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

5,066 Views
4,661 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

6,933 Views
4,645 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Icinga

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Icinga and HPE OneView are competing products in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management space. HPE OneView appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, which make it stand out to companies seeking advanced functionality, though Icinga is favored for its pricing and customer support.

Features: Icinga offers flexible integrations, robust alerting capabilities, and effective monitoring of various infrastructures. HPE OneView provides comprehensive infrastructure lifecycle management, enhanced automation, and simplifies complex tasks. The key distinction lies in HPE OneView's automation and management focus compared to Icinga's emphasis on monitoring and alerts.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could improve its integration process, enhance user interface intuitiveness, and offer more detailed documentation. HPE OneView may need to simplify its complexity, provide more flexible pricing models, and streamline its deployment to address concerns about cumbersome processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga's deployment is generally smoother due to its open-source nature and customization adaptability. HPE OneView offers comprehensive customer service with a more structured deployment model. Some may find HPE OneView's process cumbersome due to its complexity, whereas Icinga's setup is simpler.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga is known for its cost-effective setup, with open-source benefits making it ideal for small-to-medium-sized enterprises seeking a high ROI. HPE OneView involves a higher initial cost, suited for larger organizations that find the ROI justified by its advanced management capabilities. HPE OneView's ROI may appeal more to larger entities, while Icinga suits budget-conscious firms aiming for essential monitoring tools.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE OneView vs. Icinga Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Icinga

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,973 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Icinga

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

47th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (40th), Server Monitoring (16th), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 1.4%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE OneView	1.1%
Icinga	1.4%
Other	97.5%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Gaining seamless monitoring and customization capabilities

One of the best features of HPE OneView is that you get a complete architecture with a single click. The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios. The features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers. There is more feasibility when using HP Service Manager because, unlike other tools with predefined standards for script writing, we have the option for customization as per our choice, and dashboard reports can be customized.

Read full review

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"So, for us, just the simplicity of being able to manage everything within that single pane of glass has been just huge for us."

"Comprehensive dashboard, ease of use are key features."

"It has improved the working of our organization by providing more consistency within our firmware, drivers, firmware baseline and server profiling; thus it provides more consistency."

"Universality of product Broad range of integration points for third-party software Broad range of tools to create executive and operations dashboards."

"I like the ability that we can manage multiple enclosures within OneView; it's like one stop shopping where you can manage all the server profiles and do everything from a blade enclosure standpoint using OneView."

"The stability is very good, and I have never had an issue with it over the three years that I have been using it."

"They give great service, and it's a great product, at a good price."

"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."

More HPE OneView pros

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

"We monitor all, starting from UPS to international mail chains."

"Icinga2 was designed to delegate, distribute and balance tasks between several nodes."

"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."

"I would recommend Icinga; it's an open-source solution, it's quite easy and simple to use, and checks can be run with Python code and Shell Script code."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"Although the product is meant only for HPE, it would be great if they were to incorporate functionality from non-HPE components."

"Sometimes it gets slow, so it doesn’t always perform well."

"From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option."

"I’d like to see more functionality going towards the hybrid IT."

"I would like to see support for things that aren't in the current generation. We have a lot of 7th and 8th generation hardware."

"It is sometimes limited between what we see and in the next version that there will be in the global dashboard, and it will help us to get a global overview."

"It needs more reporting capabilities."

"I would like OneView to support VMware."

More HPE OneView cons

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Use it. It is free."

"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"HPE could lower the price."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

"The solution is free to use."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"It's an open-source solution."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"The solution is cheap."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,973 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE OneView?

Regarding the integration capabilities of HPE OneView with platforms such as VMware, SAP, or other platforms, I work for Telecom VAS servers, for SMSC, CMC, and CRB. We already have an HP team in p...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco UCS Manager vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

July 2026

Download HPE OneView product report

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

July 2026

Download Icinga product report

Also Known As

HP OneView

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

HPE OneView offers a centralized platform for managing IT infrastructure with ease, emphasizing automation and reducing errors. Its integrated approach provides users unified control over storage, compute, and network management.

HPE OneView delivers comprehensive infrastructure visibility and effective monitoring through a user-friendly interface. Automation, real-time alerts, and quick server deployment enhance operational efficiency. Seamless integration and profile templates further streamline workflows. Despite its strengths, some users seek improved navigation, faster response times, and extended platform support. Enhanced reporting and support for older hardware models are desirable.

What key features make HPE OneView valuable?

Single Pane of Glass: Centralized management across IT infrastructure.
Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces deployment times.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications for proactive management.
User-Friendly Interface: Enhances ease of use and reduces training time.
Profile Templates: Simplifies configuration for consistent deployments.
Unified Console: Supports storage, compute, and network management seamlessly.

What ROI should users consider when evaluating HPE OneView?

Efficiency Gains: Automation reduces manual effort and errors.
Improved Monitoring: Centralized alerts ensure quick issue resolution.
Deployment Speed: Faster setup times for IT resources.
Integration Benefits: Seamless connections with virtualization platforms enhance workflows.
Cost Reduction: Streamlined operations lower operational expenses.

Companies leverage HPE OneView across sectors such as finance, telecom, and government, utilizing its capabilities for unified monitoring, management, and configuration. It's implemented on-premises and as a hybrid cloud management interface, supporting environments like Synergy and VMware. By integrating with virtualization platforms, it advances hardware, firmware, and network management efficiency, significantly reducing manual processes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Icinga

June 2026

Free Report: HPE OneView vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE OneView vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,973 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE OneView vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.