HPE OneView vs Icinga comparison

Read 17 Icinga reviews

6,705 Views
4,492 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Icinga and HPE OneView are competing products in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management space. HPE OneView appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, which make it stand out to companies seeking advanced functionality, though Icinga is favored for its pricing and customer support.

Features: Icinga offers flexible integrations, robust alerting capabilities, and effective monitoring of various infrastructures. HPE OneView provides comprehensive infrastructure lifecycle management, enhanced automation, and simplifies complex tasks. The key distinction lies in HPE OneView's automation and management focus compared to Icinga's emphasis on monitoring and alerts.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could improve its integration process, enhance user interface intuitiveness, and offer more detailed documentation. HPE OneView may need to simplify its complexity, provide more flexible pricing models, and streamline its deployment to address concerns about cumbersome processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga's deployment is generally smoother due to its open-source nature and customization adaptability. HPE OneView offers comprehensive customer service with a more structured deployment model. Some may find HPE OneView's process cumbersome due to its complexity, whereas Icinga's setup is simpler.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga is known for its cost-effective setup, with open-source benefits making it ideal for small-to-medium-sized enterprises seeking a high ROI. HPE OneView involves a higher initial cost, suited for larger organizations that find the ROI justified by its advanced management capabilities. HPE OneView's ROI may appeal more to larger entities, while Icinga suits budget-conscious firms aiming for essential monitoring tools.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE OneView vs. Icinga Report (Updated: April 2026).

Download the complete report

HPE OneView vs. Icinga

April 2026

Helped 896,942 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Icinga

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

47th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (38th), Server Monitoring (16th), Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 1.5%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE OneView	1.1%
Icinga	1.5%
Other	97.4%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Gaining seamless monitoring and customization capabilities

One of the best features of HPE OneView is that you get a complete architecture with a single click. The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios. The features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers. There is more feasibility when using HP Service Manager because, unlike other tools with predefined standards for script writing, we have the option for customization as per our choice, and dashboard reports can be customized.

Read full review

Claudio Kuenzler

Senior Systems Engineer at Infiniroot

A free and time-saving product that helps to monitor servers and network devices

I use the product for server and network device monitoring. A team of five people is managing the solution, and around 50 people are using the solution in the organization Pro-active monitoring and alerting helped us to decrease downtimes of services. The apply rules feature saves a lot of time.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very scalable."

"Its ease of use and that it is a single-pane-of-glass are the most valuable features."

"The ease of installation and use help you to come up with a turnkey solution as quickly as possible."

"The automation that we get within OneView and the visibility across all of our different products are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable features are the composable structure, infrastructure, and automation."

"The product is really stable."

"We also have the 3PAR and the GUI is almost the same. So the recognition is very good."

"I definitely recommend OneView; if you are an HPE shop, it's the way of the future."

More HPE OneView pros

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"Icinga2 was designed to delegate, distribute and balance tasks between several nodes."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

"An affordable solution for small organizations to do basic network monitoring."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

"I would recommend Icinga; it's an open-source solution, it's quite easy and simple to use, and checks can be run with Python code and Shell Script code."

"If you have a small infrastructure or a small number of devices that you want to monitor, then I think it's a good solution."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"The possibility to do more analytics regarding the status of the assets."

"I hate to say, not a lot. It's encouraging to see a couple of features in version 4 that we think ought to have been there from the start."

"I'd like to know where the product is going, whether it's converging with another, whether they're going to shut it down, etc."

"It needs more reporting capabilities."

"There is no way currently to manage the onboard storage from the servers through the OneView application."

"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."

"Technical support is not very good. The engineers do not know a lot about the product, even when asked simplistic questions."

"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."

More HPE OneView cons

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

"Network Discovery capabilities would be extremely helpful."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"The user interface should be improved."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me."

"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."

"I am happy with the price."

"Use it. It is free."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"HPE could lower the price."

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The solution is free to use."

"The solution is cheap."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

What advice do you have for others considering HPE OneView?

Regarding the integration capabilities of HPE OneView with platforms such as VMware, SAP, or other platforms, I work for Telecom VAS servers, for SMSC, CMC, and CRB. We already have an HP team in p...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?

It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...

What needs improvement with Icinga?

There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...

What is your primary use case for Icinga?

We use Icinga as a monitoring solution to monitor customers' infrastructures. We work as a managed service provider, so we offer monitoring and many other services to our customers. So we use it in...

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco UCS Manager vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 7% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Download HPE OneView product report

HPE OneView

May 2026

Download Icinga product report

May 2026

Also Known As

HP OneView

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

HPE OneView offers a centralized platform for managing IT infrastructure with ease, emphasizing automation and reducing errors. Its integrated approach provides users unified control over storage, compute, and network management.

HPE OneView delivers comprehensive infrastructure visibility and effective monitoring through a user-friendly interface. Automation, real-time alerts, and quick server deployment enhance operational efficiency. Seamless integration and profile templates further streamline workflows. Despite its strengths, some users seek improved navigation, faster response times, and extended platform support. Enhanced reporting and support for older hardware models are desirable.

What key features make HPE OneView valuable?

Single Pane of Glass: Centralized management across IT infrastructure.
Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces deployment times.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications for proactive management.
User-Friendly Interface: Enhances ease of use and reduces training time.
Profile Templates: Simplifies configuration for consistent deployments.
Unified Console: Supports storage, compute, and network management seamlessly.

What ROI should users consider when evaluating HPE OneView?

Efficiency Gains: Automation reduces manual effort and errors.
Improved Monitoring: Centralized alerts ensure quick issue resolution.
Deployment Speed: Faster setup times for IT resources.
Integration Benefits: Seamless connections with virtualization platforms enhance workflows.
Cost Reduction: Streamlined operations lower operational expenses.

Companies leverage HPE OneView across sectors such as finance, telecom, and government, utilizing its capabilities for unified monitoring, management, and configuration. It's implemented on-premises and as a hybrid cloud management interface, supporting environments like Synergy and VMware. By integrating with virtualization platforms, it advances hardware, firmware, and network management efficiency, significantly reducing manual processes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre