HPE OneView vs Icinga comparison

Read 17 Icinga reviews

4,456 Views
3,387 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Icinga and HPE OneView are competing products in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management space. HPE OneView appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, which make it stand out to companies seeking advanced functionality, though Icinga is favored for its pricing and customer support.

Features: Icinga offers flexible integrations, robust alerting capabilities, and effective monitoring of various infrastructures. HPE OneView provides comprehensive infrastructure lifecycle management, enhanced automation, and simplifies complex tasks. The key distinction lies in HPE OneView's automation and management focus compared to Icinga's emphasis on monitoring and alerts.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could improve its integration process, enhance user interface intuitiveness, and offer more detailed documentation. HPE OneView may need to simplify its complexity, provide more flexible pricing models, and streamline its deployment to address concerns about cumbersome processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga's deployment is generally smoother due to its open-source nature and customization adaptability. HPE OneView offers comprehensive customer service with a more structured deployment model. Some may find HPE OneView's process cumbersome due to its complexity, whereas Icinga's setup is simpler.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga is known for its cost-effective setup, with open-source benefits making it ideal for small-to-medium-sized enterprises seeking a high ROI. HPE OneView involves a higher initial cost, suited for larger organizations that find the ROI justified by its advanced management capabilities. HPE OneView's ROI may appeal more to larger entities, while Icinga suits budget-conscious firms aiming for essential monitoring tools.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE OneView vs. Icinga Report (Updated: January 2026).

Download the complete report

HPE OneView vs. Icinga

January 2026

Helped 882,886 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Icinga

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (24th), Server Monitoring (14th), Cloud Monitoring Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 2.1%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE OneView	1.3%
Icinga	2.1%
Other	96.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sajith Alawwa

Sr. Systems Engineer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient management and upgrades streamline complex setups

My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory. Constant issues arise, leading to frequent replacement of blade parts. Additionally, the upgrade process is lengthy, requiring careful planning as we cannot match ESXi versions without aligning OneView first, leading to delays.

Read full review

Harrison Bulley

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Net Consulting

A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification

I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the composable structure, infrastructure, and automation."

"It's rather simple to use, and that's very important for us."

"I don't have to use CD-ROMs or anything like that to provision the servers."

"Comprehensive dashboard, ease of use are key features."

"The best part is that you can integrate a two-way network. Earlier we could not manage the storage and ToR switch. Now we can create a LAN with our storage without any interface. In terms of switch management, it is now easy to understand the current configuration. It provides centralized management. It provides a single pane, and you can easily do all updates in one shot. It is a great product."

"We cannot function without this solution. "

"The remote support automatically logs service calls and support cases with HPE, which is really good."

"HPE OneView allows me to monitor access and check the health of the infrastructure in a single console."

More HPE OneView pros

"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"Icinga does the job and is fairly stable."

"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"We've had issues, for example, with RAM."

"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."

"Use it, but do not think it is going into the clouds, because it is not. There is room for improvement."

"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."

"There was a feature called HPE cloud manager, but now it is owned by Micro Focus. HPE should make a cloud optimizer again."

"Those features, coming in version 4, that we're looking for are the discovery, primarily. But I think the scope-based access control is of interest, although, we didn't see any directory integration, so that, in itself, seems like it's still limited."

"My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory."

"I would like to see them expand into other cloud platforms, non-HPE platforms."

More HPE OneView cons

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me."

"The user interface should be improved."

"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"Use it. It is free."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

"The solution is free to use."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The solution is cheap."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Educational Organization

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE OneView?

The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?

It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...

What needs improvement with Icinga?

There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...

What is your primary use case for Icinga?

We use Icinga as a monitoring solution to monitor customers' infrastructures. We work as a managed service provider, so we offer monitoring and many other services to our customers. So we use it in...

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 10% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 7% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 23% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Download HPE OneView product report

HPE OneView

February 2026

Download Icinga product report

February 2026

Also Known As

HP OneView

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre