Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Evanios vs Icinga comparison

Evanios and Icinga are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Evanios is ranked #69, while Icinga is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.7. Evanios holds a 0.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Icinga’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Evanios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.
Evanios
Read 6 Evanios reviews
  • 211 Views
  • 119 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Icinga
Read 17 Icinga reviews
  • 3,310 Views
  • 2,955 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Icinga and Evanios are both contenders in IT infrastructure and systems management. While Icinga excels in pricing and customer support, Evanios stands out for its comprehensive feature set aimed at organizations needing an all-encompassing solution.

Features: Icinga provides extensive monitoring capabilities, customizable configurations, and integration with various third-party applications. Evanios includes dynamic correlation, automation features, and seamless integration with IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could benefit from easier configuration processes, more detailed vendor support, and enhanced automation capabilities. Evanios might improve in areas such as reducing its complexity, lowering its initial cost, and offering more flexibility in deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga’s open-source nature provides flexible deployment choices but often requires advanced technical skills and community-driven support. Evanios offers a more guided deployment process supported by vendor assistance, which may be simpler for organizations lacking strong internal IT resources.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga often involves a lower setup cost, providing a good ROI for those mindful of their budget. Evanios demands a higher upfront investment due to its structured pricing; however, its advanced features and potential efficiencies can lead to substantial ROI over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Evanios vs. Icinga Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Evanios vs. Icinga
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Evanios
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
69th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (17th), IT Operations Analytics (18th)
Icinga
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
16th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (17th), Server Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Evanios is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 4.0%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

it_user592602 - PeerSpot reviewer
The vendor is willing to work with us and develop solutions for products they did not already have an integration for.
As with any new software implementation, during the integration we found a couple of minor issues when integrating certain products (such as SCOM). However, each time this happened Evanios was very quick to identify the bug we were seeing, patch it and provide the new update set for us to install. Also, during the evaluation of Evanios we found that they already had integrations with most of our larger monitoring tools, however they also stated that they would be able to create update sets to integrate certain products we used that they did not currently support. This proved to be very valuable for us because they were able to become an even better fit for our organization by creating update sets\integrations for PRTG, Quest Foglight, TIBCO and Thousand Eyes as well.
Read full review
Harrison Bulley - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification
I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Provided up to a 90% noise reduction in some our noisy monitoring tools."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you might have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops."
"The ability to manipulate events via JavaScript getting the exact data that we want."
"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."
"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."
"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."
"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."
"Icinga does the job and is fairly stable."
"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."
"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."
"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."
More Icinga pros
 

Cons

"We would like the ability to have an "exit" option for events when they are being processed."
"More complex correlation rules would be nice. The ability to clearly define a parent event in a correlation and nested correlations, specifically."
"The price could be cheaper."
"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."
"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."
"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."
"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."
"The user interface should be improved."
"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."
"Icinga’s automation could be improved."
"In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI."
More Icinga cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is cheap."
"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."
"The solution is free to use."
"It's an open-source solution."
"We're using the free version of Icinga."
"This is an open-source solution with paid support."
"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."
"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Icinga?
The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?
It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Icinga?
There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Zabbix vs Icinga Logo
Zabbix vs Icinga
Compared 46% of the time
Nagios Core vs Icinga Logo
Nagios Core vs Icinga
Compared 23% of the time
Checkmk vs Icinga Logo
Checkmk vs Icinga
Compared 10% of the time
Nagios XI vs Icinga Logo
Nagios XI vs Icinga
Compared 3% of the time
Centreon vs Icinga Logo
Centreon vs Icinga
Compared 3% of the time
More Icinga Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Evanios
April 2025
Evanios reportDownload Evanios product report
Buyer's Guide
Icinga
April 2025
Icinga reportDownload Icinga product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Icinga Cloud Monitoring
 

Overview

A key component of the Event Management process is consolidation of events from across the enterprise. By consolidating disparate events into a single solution, they can be de-duplicated and correlated. For example, network failure events can be correlated with system failures, and then prioritized based on service impact.

Reduce the noise

Evanios Integrations allows filtering and processing close to the event source, keeping the weight off of the ServiceNow system for increased performance. Filters are easily configured. EVA, the Evanios consolidation point also has built in event flood control features, to protect against unexpected event storms which can quickly overload traditional integrations.

Evanios

Icinga monitors systems, network devices, infrastructure, and services, helping manage and analyze server resources. It automates ticket incidents and alerting, providing oversight of client Windows and Linux systems.

Icinga offers comprehensive monitoring of servers including CPU utilization and RAM space, facilitating automated incident management and alerting. Frequently deployed on-premises, this monitoring tool is key for managed services providers and organizations to oversee and ensure optimal performance of various environments, including applications like databases and web servers. It provides extensive features for creating custom plugins, stabilization, scalability, and high customization capabilities suitable for different infrastructure needs.

What are the key features of Icinga?
  • Event Handler: Facilitates automatic self-healing of systems.
  • Extensive Plugin Library: Offers a wide range of plugins for monitoring.
  • Ease of Use: Simplifies user experience with an intuitive interface and Icinga Director for easy configurations.
  • Open-Source Nature: Free to use, modify, and distribute.
  • Automation Capabilities: Integrates with APIs and Ansible Collections for automation.
  • Custom Plugins: Users can create and integrate their own plugins.
  • Stability and Scalability: Provides reliable performance across different scale infrastructures.
What are the benefits or ROI to look for when evaluating Icinga?
  • Critical Issue Highlighting: Effectively identifies and notifies about critical problems.
  • High Customization: Offers flexibility for diverse monitoring needs.
  • Automated Alerting: Reduces manual effort and improves response times.
  • Extensive Integration: Works seamlessly with other tools and platforms.

Icinga implementations span multiple industries, providing essential monitoring for IT infrastructure in healthcare, finance, and education. Managed services providers utilize Icinga to maintain and monitor client systems across various environments while ensuring optimal performance and compliance. It is highly valued in these sectors for its ability to customize monitoring, improving operational efficiency and reducing downtime.

Icinga
 

Sample Customers

Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca
Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre
Buyer's Guide
Evanios vs. Icinga
April 2025
Free Report: Evanios vs. Icinga
Find out what your peers are saying about Evanios vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Evanios vs. Icinga report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.