Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Exabeam vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Exabeam and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category. Exabeam is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.6, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5. Exabeam holds a 0.5% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
Exabeam
Read 19 Exabeam reviews
  • 85 Views
  • 54 Comparison Views
73% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Read 5 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews
  • 1,096 Views
  • 280 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Exabeam and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Exabeam vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Exabeam vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Exabeam
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (15th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (3rd), Security Incident Response (5th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (7th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (9th)
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Exabeam is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.3%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Stephen-Armstrong - PeerSpot reviewer
The SIEM provides a user-friendly UI experience
When events come into the system, the dashboard categorizes them by the highest risk score, not when they appear on the system. When you've got multiple ongoing incidents you can only see the highest risk score at the top of the list rather than the most recent detection. Exabeam's reporting dashboard could have included a filtering option to filter by the most recent detection.
Read full review
RichPhillips - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies
The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.  The solution has provided us with a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies.  I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.  I…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Exabeam SIEM has a user friendly UI interface."
"Exabeam has improved our organization by speeding up the investigation process."
"The ThreatHunter in Advanced Analytics is the most valuable. It helps analyze compromised assets and provides analysis for any entity within my client's environment."
"I have customers that like the EUBA functionality of it. The solution has the ability to build a session, basically. It pulls a lot of information together, for example, everything a user does in a specific timeframe. It's quite helpful."
"It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"Exabeam Fusion SIEM has a good performance and more advantages than traditional solutions."
"The solution's automation capabilities are great."
More Exabeam pros
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."
 

Cons

"The only problem is that the UI is not very impressive."
"The solution's reporting and dashboarding could be improved."
"We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules."
"Exabeam's reporting dashboard could have included a filtering option to filter by the most recent detection."
"We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment."
"I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product."
"They should provide detailed information about detecting phishing emails."
"The customer service and support are not satisfactory."
More Exabeam cons
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."
"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."
"The solution is expensive."
"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."
"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."
"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."
"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."
"It is expensive."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
See all answers
What do you like most about Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
The solution's initial setup process is easy.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on discussions in meetings.
See all answers
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam
Compared 12% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam
Compared 8% of the time
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam
Compared 8% of the time
Cortex XSIAM vs Exabeam Logo
Cortex XSIAM vs Exabeam
Compared 6% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs Exabeam Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Exabeam
Compared 6% of the time
More Exabeam Competitors
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 60% of the time
Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 40% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Exabeam
April 2025
Exabeam reportDownload Exabeam product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
April 2025
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reportDownload Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management
 

Overview

Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Exabeam

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
Telkom Indonesia
Buyer's Guide
Exabeam vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
March 2025
Free Report: Exabeam vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Exabeam vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.