Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Exinda vs Sangfor WANO comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Exinda's customer service receives mixed reviews, citing issues with ticket logging, support availability, and delayed quotes, but some positive feedback.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Exinda requires better support, simpler licensing, faster updates, more training, improved performance, enhanced cloud compatibility, and VLAN-based monitoring.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Exinda is scalable for small to medium businesses, handles various bandwidths, and easily upgrades with presales steps and future models.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Exinda provides scalable licenses with competitive pricing and valuable features, ideal for cost-conscious organizations, available via annual bandwidth licenses.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Exinda's stability improved in version 7.2; minor dashboard issues exist, but users generally trust its performance without seeking alternatives.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Exinda enhances network management with traffic prioritization, dynamic throughput, application control, monitoring, and tailored policies for efficient optimization.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Exinda
Ranking in WAN Optimization
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sangfor WANO
Ranking in WAN Optimization
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the WAN Optimization category, the mindshare of Exinda is 5.0%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sangfor WANO is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
WAN Optimization
 

Featured Reviews

EH
Gives us the ability to prioritize network traffic into a hierarchy
Creating the custom application is a bit awkward. I kind of have to guess my way through it sometimes. A lot of working with this solution is really intuitive. I have picked it up mostly on my own. I'm sure that there are some things that maybe I hadn't thought of or really hadn't considered, and I think it would be good just to promote some day courses. I don't really see a whole lot that comes out for Exinda as far as training or informational sessions through our normal resellers. It would be cool to know more about the solution by utilizing educational resources or even have Exinda promoted a bit better.
Use Sangfor WANO?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Real Estate/Law Firm
13%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Sangfor WAN Optimization
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UMass Dartmouth, MLB Network, R&R Ice Cream, Savills, Manhattan School of Music, Blum Shapiro, Cincinnati Public Schools, City of Richmond, Genting Casinos, The Salvation Army, VoIP Unlimited, Frontier Silicon, Lakeshore Toltest, CTI Foods
Coolpad, Tradewinds Plantation Berhad, Toyota TBN, Kenanga Investment Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, HPE Aruba Networking, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.