ExtremeWireless vs Omada Access Points comparison

Extreme and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Extreme is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while TP-Link is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Extreme holds a 1.6% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Extreme users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

ExtremeWireless

Read 29 ExtremeWireless reviews

1,852 Views
1,617 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

4,292 Views
3,463 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtremeWireless

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

ExtremeWireless and Omada Access Points compete in the wireless network solutions category. Omada Access Points are favored for their feature-rich offerings at a competitive price.

Features: ExtremeWireless showcases high-performance analytics, advanced security, and scalability. Omada Access Points excel with centralized cloud management, seamless integration, and extensive guest network capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ExtremeWireless could enhance cloud management integration and streamline their customer service responsiveness. Additionally, they might improve deployment flexibility. Omada Access Points need more robust mesh networking and improved mobile compatibility, as well as enhanced accessibility for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtremeWireless offers straightforward deployment with mixed reviews on customer service. Omada Access Points provide intuitive cloud-based management and reliable support for an efficient setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeWireless requires a higher initial cost, offset by strong performance and longevity. Omada Access Points are cost-effective with efficient performance, ensuring attractive ROI for smaller and medium implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtremeWireless vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeWireless vs. Omada Access Points

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtremeWireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of ExtremeWireless is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.7%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Seungho Yang

Network Engineer at KOREAN AIR

Enhanced employee access with effective wireless monitoring and seamless roaming

Our use case for ExtremeWireless is to allow our employees to access the company systems The monitoring systems in ExtremeWireless have been very effective, and they are cheaper than other products. It provides better monitoring logs and detailed logs compared to Cisco Wireless. The most…

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Extreme access points perform very well in high-density environments, and we use them at sites with our customers."

"The initial setup process is simple."

"I like Cloud IQ, ExtremeWireless' cloud controller and analytics platform. It's full of information, easy to use, and provides excellent visibility into my network."

"The product's price is competitive. It is an impressive and reliable product."

"The monitoring system is integrated with AI features."

"The most useful feature is how the product integrates with the Microsoft directory in the cloud."

"ExtremeWireless is known for its strong security engine, Air Defense, which provides necessary wireless security assistance to many of my customers."

"ExtremeWireless has good performance."

More ExtremeWireless pros

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"This product is easy to use."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"Its sturdiness and cost-effectiveness are the most valuable features."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"The solution should offer better support."

"One area that could be improved is the accuracy of tracking tags."

"Many companies prefer Aruba over ExtremeWireless, possibly due to Aruba's broader range of products or their thorough approach to understanding customer needs."

"The onsite controllers are not as good as the cloud controller. I would also like ExtremeWireless to add web filtering on the access point. This feature is available from other vendors but not ExtremeWireless."

"The ExtremeWireless WiNG Access Point on-premise is not as good as the cloud and many of my customers are switching. It is easier for my clients to manage everything from the cloud. I currently use a model of the controller that does not support any cloud functionality."

"The management portal is in need of improvement."

"They should develop more troubleshooting tools for system management. Additional troubleshooting tools should be created by the engineers."

"ExtremeWireless should fix some general bugs and make the user interface more user-friendly."

More ExtremeWireless cons

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the price of Extreme Wireless a three out of five."

"The price of the solution overall is expensive. Additionally, the controller and license are expensive. We pay for an annual subscription."

"The license cost per AP is about $150 USD."

"ExtremeWireless isn't budget-friendly. The hardware costs around 20,000 Indian rupees. We're still using an older controller, so it doesn't require a license, unlike the newest versions of the ExtremeWireless controller."

"ExtremeWireless is subscription-based for both cloud and on-prem solutions, and it's quite expensive."

"The purchase of 350 access points cost approximately $250,000 USD."

"I rate the product's pricing a three or four out of ten."

"There are both paid and free licenses of the cloud environment, with only basic functionality in the free version."

More ExtremeWireless pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

11%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtremeWireless?

The initial setup process is simple.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtremeWireless?

There is some delay in firmware upgrades for access points. When there is a problem with the firmware of one access point, the correction might be too late.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ExtremeWireless?

We work with some end customers, and we use ExtremeCloud IQ ( /products/extremecloud-iq-reviews ) for the administration of the wireless platform. We use Wi-Fi 6 E for many users.

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ruckus Wireless vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 39% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 20% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 8% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs ExtremeWireless

Compared 2% of the time

More ExtremeWireless Competitors

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 20% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 18% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeWireless

March 2025

Download ExtremeWireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

March 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Extreme ExtremeWireless Access Points deliver wired-like performance, at scale for high-density in every environment. Smart Access Points are equally adept for both distributed and centralized deployment models. ExtremeWireless Controllers provide advanced functionality to allow organizations to define how wireless voice/video/data traffic is processed without architectural constraints and in accordance with business needs.

Extreme

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

St. Xavier High School, Americatel, Diamond Light Source

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeWireless vs. Omada Access Points

March 2025

Free Report: ExtremeWireless vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtremeWireless vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtremeWireless vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.