Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Field Effect MDR vs SecureDetect comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Binary Defense MDR
Sponsored
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
7th
Average Rating
9.2
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Field Effect MDR
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
4th
Average Rating
9.2
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SecureDetect
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
88th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Binary Defense MDR is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 2.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SecureDetect is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
 

Featured Reviews

BC
May 12, 2023
It saves us a lot of time because we're not dealing with false alarms
The most valuable part of Binary Defense is its team of cybersecurity analysts. Their analysts filter out the noise and only forward the critical threats that require a response instead of false positives. Binary Defense is somewhat customizable. We can do some whitelisting and tell them to ignore some alerts that are always false positives. They're flexible and can adjust their processes. Their MDR tool runs across all our endpoints. Within that Open XDR strategy, we can ingest those alerts in various ways, but we tend to do things the old-fashioned way. However, we could bring that data into a SIEM if we wanted to. We haven't taken advantage of that feature, but we will soon. It would limit our ability to move forward with them if they didn't have that option.
Emma Elkind - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 24, 2024
Creates a very good layer of protection and their team is very easy to work with
It is very important that Field Effect MDR is backed by experts who are constantly monitoring for attacks and risks. The main reason we went with Field Effect was the experience that the CEO brings and the experience we had with the team. Their process for educating us was another reason. I do not have direct access to its user interface, but I have heard from the team that it is very easy for them to access and see alerts come in. They found it very easy. We could see its benefits pretty much right away. We started getting the alerts as soon as we started using it. We started to receive alerts on areas that we needed to address right away. It definitely adds a specific layer of protection. I would not want to be without it, but it is not the only piece that we would use to proactively protect all our threat surfaces. It creates a very good layer, and for myself, the team has been a good access point to be able to get information and share that with clients too. That has been a big help for me. Compared to other software that we use, whenever we need assistance, they are the easiest ones to work with. We can get immediate assistance through chat. Field Effect MDR helps our security team save time. We do not have to monitor a lot of things and go digging behind the scenes. They are doing that monitoring for us. It has almost added an employee who would have been doing that work for us. It has probably cut down on a third of our workload. It informs us of the threats that matter and how to address them. We get alerts on even small issues that we do not need to address immediately. It helps to keep such things in the front of mind so that we can plan and schedule. It feels like it has made our operations run smoother because it is alerting us. Instead of just leaving it, we can schedule an update right away. We are addressing things right away. If an immediate problem comes up, we can deal with it as soon as possible because we have already scheduled something smaller, like an update. Field Effect MDR gives us recommendations on how to reduce our risk. If there is something like a shared folder and they are seeing multiple accesses or credentials, they send us recommendations. We can let the client know as well about those recommendations. These recommendations are very important because our staff does not have to spend time thinking of a solution. The solution is already presented to us. We may add to the solution, but we do not have to spend time looking for a solution.
Use SecureDetect?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Binary Defense has changed its pricing model from being primarily based on the volume of data to one based on escalations and incidents they handle."
"The solution's price is spot on; if anything, it's slightly below the norm for most services. Compared to building the same team internally, it would cost more to create the same amount of capability than what we get from an external team. Price-wise, Binary Defense is in a great spot."
"Binary Defense MDR is priced competitively and may be slightly lower than CrowdStrike."
"From the initial cost that Binary Defense came in with, we pared it down quite a bit over the course of 30 or 60 days. My leadership would say that their cost was high, but realistically, they were in line with the market."
"After we acquired this platform, we met with a number of different vendors. Binary Defense came in with a proposal that was surprisingly affordable. In fact, we were able to recoup the cost of their services within a short period of time. This is because Binary Defense is able to provide the same level of security as a team of two or three in-house analysts but at a fraction of the cost. As a result, Binary Defense is saving us an estimated $250,000 to $300,000 per year."
"The pricing isn't that bad, it's very competitive. I don't feel that it's over-priced and I don't feel that it's under-priced."
"The pricing is very good. They are definitely competitive and they were lower at the time that we went with them."
"The pricing is on target. Working with their sales team on pricing negotiations was a pleasant process. They were very respectful of the constraints we had and I feel that we're paying a fair price."
"The pricing is fair and reasonable."
"A top-tier competitor to Field Effect in Magic Quadrant that we had been using until our switch to Field Effect was a great product, but each capability had an additional charge. We had to license modules separately, and each of those add-ons had to be added onto its own consumption and agreement. It was a nightmare from a billing perspective because we had multiple agreements, and each one had a jagged anniversary or a renewal anniversary. It was a nightmare, whereas Field Effect MDR is one product."
"The pricing is comparable to what else is out there."
"It is on the high end, but it is worth it for the service that you get from them."
"Field Effect Covalence's pricing is just right."
"The pricing isn't sized, so Field Effect doesn't make it easy for anything under 25 users. I'm not crazy about that."
"Covalence is cost-effective."
"We're currently enrolled in the volume package, which offers tiered pricing based on usage."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
60%
Government
5%
Non Profit
5%
Retailer
3%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Binary Defense MDR?
The most valuable feature is reviewing tickets and the notes added by technicians.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Binary Defense MDR?
The pricing is very competitive; it's on par with or below others. For those sensitive to pricing, I'd advise that th...
What needs improvement with Binary Defense MDR?
Sometimes, something may not install right; however, whenever we have challenges, they are very solution-oriented and...
What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?
It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?
Field Effect is fairly priced from my perspective. You get a lot of bang for the buck with this and a level of visibi...
What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?
Field Effect MDR could broaden the portfolio of supported cloud applications. They integrate about 15 to 20 out of th...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Binary Defense Vision, Binary Defense Managed Detection and Response, Binary Defense Managed Detection & Response
Field Effect Covalence
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Securitas USA, Black Hills Energy, Lincoln Electric,The J.M. Smuckers Company, New York Community Bank, State of Connecticut, NCR
Information Not Available
Arriva Trains, Staffordshire CC
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Arctic Wolf Networks, Huntress and others in Managed Detection and Response (MDR). Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.