Field Effect MDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance comparison

Field Effect and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Field Effect is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.2, while SentinelOne is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. Field Effect holds a 3.2% mindshare in MDR, compared to SentinelOne’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Field Effect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Field Effect MDR

Read 29 Field Effect MDR reviews

4,443 Views
1,011 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SentinelOne Vigilance

Read 20 SentinelOne Vigilance reviews

4,356 Views
3,106 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

SentinelOne Vigilance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

SentinelOne Vigilance and Field Effect MDR are both significant contenders in the cybersecurity space, focusing on providing robust security features. Based on features and comprehensiveness, SentinelOne holds a slight edge due to its unique functionalities.

Features: SentinelOne Vigilance is noted for behavior analytics, machine learning, and ease of use. Its rollback function and lack of kernel dependency add significant advantages. Field Effect MDR offers comprehensive threat monitoring, with expert-backed 24/7 surveillance and detailed AROs for enhanced threat visibility.

Room for Improvement: SentinelOne Vigilance could enhance system integration, dashboard control, and include mobile and Linux support. Field Effect MDR needs to improve response accuracy, expand cloud application integration, and refine reporting and email security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SentinelOne Vigilance supports Public, Private, and Hybrid clouds, with technical support noted for promptness but lacking with complex issues. Field Effect MDR operates mainly on-premises with hybrid options and offers comprehensive support with minimal need for regular assistance.

Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne Vigilance is priced higher but offers fair cost-effective licensing and positive ROI perceptions. Field Effect MDR offers competitive per-user pricing, providing savings for businesses with multiple systems, though security budget constraints can be challenging.

To learn more, read our detailed Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

4th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SentinelOne Vigilance

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 3.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Vigilance is 7.0%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Simon Cutler

Director of Operations at Intega IT

Helps to manage cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and improve our security team's efficiency and security posture

It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying. While it's fantastic that they're proactive in this area, the time commitment is significant. Integrating patching into their existing service offering would be a game-changer. I'd love to see a tool that aids sales discovery efforts when we engage new clients. Ideally, this internal tool would scan their network environment to identify potential risks and give us a comprehensive picture of their network infrastructure. This would be a huge asset in informing our sales strategies and showcasing our expertise.

Read full review

Graham Peck

Data Security Manager at Leeds United FC

Very easy to use with multiple options for licensing and scaling

Our company uses the solution instead of a traditional antivirus as an endpoint protector. We have all security alerts passed off to a SOC. We are a football club and have 350 users across coaches, medical staff, and ticketing agents. The solution is very easy to use. The solution should add…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automated response feature is incredibly effective."

"What I like the most about Field Effect Covalence is the ease of deployment, the fact that it's cost-effective to roll out, and it is reasonable."

"We now have a single cybersecurity product that protects all of our threat services, and all the endpoints."

"We are getting visibility over the network, not just for those hosts that have a Field Effect EDR agent but also things like the Internet of Things, guest networks, or rogue devices. We definitely have visibility into all network traffic, which is very cool."

"There are user notifications about our cloud solutions and access, meaning authentication and possible breaches. Overall, the notifications and alerts are valuable. There are also new features like the DNS protection, which is quite good."

"The standout feature is its continuous 24/7 monitoring of all network traffic, providing unparalleled vigilance."

"Unlike previous solutions, where we were solely informed of security incidents, Covalence's MDR allows for real-time incident prevention."

"The AROs have been incredibly helpful."

More Field Effect MDR pros

"SentinelOne Vigilance is a very stable solution."

"SentinelOne Vigilance has very good detection."

"The most valuable feature is protection against ransomware and malware."

"SentinelOne has a rollback feature that has helped them gain popularity in the market. No other competitors of the solution including Cisco, Fortinet, or Cortex XDR have this feature. SentinelOne is a kernel-independent solution. We don’t need to check the kernel dependency on the Linux platform. They also commit to a 100 percent recovery from ransomware attacks. The solution has rollback features for ransomware on Windows."

"The best feature of this solution is the third-party management aspect. An external company oversees the tool's management and monitors the data it generates. If the EDR detects suspicious activity, it will react accordingly and take necessary actions, such as blocking a device."

"The initial setup process was straightforward."

"Stable solution for protecting, deploying, and managing endpoints, and comes with valuable features such as behavioral analytics and machine learning."

"The product is stable."

More SentinelOne Vigilance pros

Cons

"They could use more third-party integrations with other MSP tools."

"I'd suggest that Field Effect focus more on including things like phishing simulation and cybersecurity training."

"The area where they can make it better is by giving responses to the end-user. For example, when there is an alert to the administrator, I get it. I have to copy and paste everything to everyone... And then I have to follow up with them, and it's a real pain."

"They put too much detail into the emails."

"Covalence's SEAS feature wasn't very user-friendly."

"The ConnectWise PSA integration is two-way but does not send our comments back to the Field Effect portal."

"While it's essential to stay informed about potential issues, the recurring notifications about past vulnerabilities can lead to confusion and may detract from our focus on current threats."

"I would like Covalence to implement patch management as well."

More Field Effect MDR cons

"SentinelOne Vigilance could improve if it provided us with more control over the dashboard."

"The support response time is not the issue, however, sometimes, the answers provided are not fully satisfactory due to the nature of the technology and issue complexity."

"It is not easy to remove the customer without the dashboard."

"My customers who use the tool mostly want a summary of the monitoring activities of the product in a report form...t can be useful for our customers to identify the threats and incidents encountered by the product."

"The process to replicate exclusions is not user-friendly."

"The only thing I'm not sure about is I haven't deployed it on any mobile devices."

"I have found issues with the solution’s stability and implementation. The solution has performance issues. I would like the solution to launch the rollback plan for ransomware on Linux and Mac. It should be something similar to the support that Windows gets."

"I suspect that the areas for improvement may not necessarily lie within the tool itself but rather in our organization's lack of knowledge and understanding of cybersecurity. Cybersecurity is a complex area, and our organization has a skill set deficit. Therefore, we rely on our cybersecurity support company to help us manage the tool and handle incidents. Our limited expertise sometimes prevents us from fully utilizing them or identifying potential gaps."

More SentinelOne Vigilance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We're currently enrolled in the volume package, which offers tiered pricing based on usage."

"The licensing model itself is solid, but we're ironing out some inconsistencies in how customer profiles are configured."

"The cost of the solution is high."

"The pricing isn't sized, so Field Effect doesn't make it easy for anything under 25 users. I'm not crazy about that."

"Field Effect is fairly priced from my perspective. You get a lot of bang for the buck with this and a level of visibility that provides you with greater peace of mind knowing that the system is carefully monitored. You also have automated responses for known malicious behavior at any time of the day. Someone could have their Office 365 mailbox compromised at 2 in the morning on a Saturday when most people are asleep or not paying attention, and the system can prevent an issue in an automated way."

"The pricing is fair and reasonable."

"It is on the high end, but it is worth it for the service that you get from them."

"Although Covalence is expensive, it provides good value for the price."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost depends on the number of connected devices and whether you purchase additional services."

"The solution’s pricing is very reasonable."

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten since it is really expensive, but it is well worth what my company gets."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten since it is a very highly-priced solution."

"I give the cost a three out of ten."

"The tool's pricing is slightly cheaper than other alternatives. It's not just about licensing costs; because we already have it implemented, we can save money on deployment and initial setup. Additionally, SentinelOne Vigilance is slightly cheaper in licensing, maybe around 10-15 percent cheaper."

"SentinelOne Vigilance is priced in a normal range."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

55%

Non Profit

Government

Media Company

Educational Organization

40%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

In our evaluation, two years ago, we found the Field Effect Covalence product and service to be the simplest to set up and pricing was lower than the other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

The solution could improved DNS filtering and fuller integration into ConnectWise PSA (I understand both are in the works). The current roaming DNS filter doesn't seem to be too complete and we're ...

See all answers

What do you like most about SentinelOne Vigilance?

The best feature of this solution is the third-party management aspect. An external company oversees the tool's management and monitors the data it generates. If the EDR detects suspicious activity...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Vigilance?

Price could be a factor since, with a lot of add-ons, the cost becomes high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SentinelOne Vigilance?

They've been adding a lot of products and technologies to their stack. I honestly don't have any specific improvements to suggest.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 22% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 21% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 14% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 30% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 10% of the time

Blackpoint Cyber MDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 9% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 9% of the time

Adlumin Cybersecurity vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 5% of the time

More SentinelOne Vigilance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

February 2025

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Vigilance

January 2025

Download SentinelOne Vigilance product report

Also Known As

Field Effect Covalence

No data available

Overview

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

Field Effect

SentinelOne Vigilance provides reliable endpoint security with features like behavior analytics and ransomware protection, offering organizations capabilities such as third-party management and effective malware detection while maintaining low resource usage and kernel-independent operations.

SentinelOne Vigilance stands out by offering robust endpoint protection, utilizing machine learning and Storyline technology to enhance malware detection and prevention. Its rollback capabilities, impressive scalability, ease of use, and comprehensive analytics are consistently acknowledged. Monthly reports offer insightful analytics, and its 100% ransomware recovery commitment adds assurance. However, areas for improvement include better integration with Microsoft Windows, SIEM, and SOAR solutions, along with enhanced dashboard control and memory forensics.

What features make SentinelOne Vigilance effective?

Reliable Endpoint Security: Protects systems with comprehensive threat detection.
Behavior Analytics: Identifies and takes action on abnormal activities.
Ransomware Protection: Includes rollback capabilities ensuring data security.
Scalability: Adapts efficiently to growing business needs.
Kernel-Independent: Operates effectively without reliance on specific kernels.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Analytics: Deep insights into security threats and responses.
Low Resource Usage: Minimizes impact on system performance.
Scalability and Ease of Use: Grows with business demands while simplifying processes.
100% Ransomware Recovery: Offers assurance against ransomware incidents.

SentinelOne Vigilance is widely implemented within industries for endpoint protection and malware detection in environments like private clouds and on-premises, aiding ransomware prevention and integration with SOC teams. Businesses across sectors rely on it to protect infrastructure and manage endpoint activities effectively.

SentinelOne

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Norwegian Airlines, TGI Fridays, AVX, FIMBank

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance

January 2025

Free Report: Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance

Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.