Field Effect MDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance comparison

Field Effect and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Field Effect is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.2, while SentinelOne is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. Field Effect holds a 3.4% mindshare in MDR, compared to SentinelOne’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Field Effect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Field Effect MDR

Read 29 Field Effect MDR reviews

4,329 Views
970 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SentinelOne Vigilance

Read 20 SentinelOne Vigilance reviews

4,448 Views
3,168 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

SentinelOne Vigilance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

SentinelOne Vigilance and Field Effect MDR are both significant contenders in the cybersecurity space, focusing on providing robust security features. Based on features and comprehensiveness, SentinelOne holds a slight edge due to its unique functionalities.

Features: SentinelOne Vigilance is noted for behavior analytics, machine learning, and ease of use. Its rollback function and lack of kernel dependency add significant advantages. Field Effect MDR offers comprehensive threat monitoring, with expert-backed 24/7 surveillance and detailed AROs for enhanced threat visibility.

Room for Improvement: SentinelOne Vigilance could enhance system integration, dashboard control, and include mobile and Linux support. Field Effect MDR needs to improve response accuracy, expand cloud application integration, and refine reporting and email security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SentinelOne Vigilance supports Public, Private, and Hybrid clouds, with technical support noted for promptness but lacking with complex issues. Field Effect MDR operates mainly on-premises with hybrid options and offers comprehensive support with minimal need for regular assistance.

Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne Vigilance is priced higher but offers fair cost-effective licensing and positive ROI perceptions. Field Effect MDR offers competitive per-user pricing, providing savings for businesses with multiple systems, though security budget constraints can be challenging.

To learn more, read our detailed Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

4th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SentinelOne Vigilance

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 3.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Vigilance is 7.5%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Simon Cutler

Director of Operations at Intega IT

Helps to manage cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and improve our security team's efficiency and security posture

It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying. While it's fantastic that they're proactive in this area, the time commitment is significant. Integrating patching into their existing service offering would be a game-changer. I'd love to see a tool that aids sales discovery efforts when we engage new clients. Ideally, this internal tool would scan their network environment to identify potential risks and give us a comprehensive picture of their network infrastructure. This would be a huge asset in informing our sales strategies and showcasing our expertise.

Read full review

Graham Peck

Data Security Manager at Leeds United FC

Very easy to use with multiple options for licensing and scaling

Our company uses the solution instead of a traditional antivirus as an endpoint protector. We have all security alerts passed off to a SOC. We are a football club and have 350 users across coaches, medical staff, and ticketing agents. The solution is very easy to use. The solution should add…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like the most about Field Effect Covalence is the ease of deployment, the fact that it's cost-effective to roll out, and it is reasonable."

"There are user notifications about our cloud solutions and access, meaning authentication and possible breaches. Overall, the notifications and alerts are valuable. There are also new features like the DNS protection, which is quite good."

"The most valuable aspects of Covalence for me are the exceptional customer service and the support from the dedicated team."

"I get alerts if there's malicious activity or restrictions, should they any suspicious activity emerge."

"The AROs have been incredibly helpful."

"Unlike previous solutions, where we were solely informed of security incidents, Covalence's MDR allows for real-time incident prevention."

"Direct and easy and quick communication to the Field Effect cybersecurity team experts has led to quick resolution of any problems or alerts."

"The most valuable features are AROs, which provide timely notifications for out-of-compliance or out-of-specification detections."

More Field Effect MDR pros

"I would rate SentinelOne's customer service and support a five out of five."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is that it works and isn't compromised. Other solutions I have used have all been compromised and SentinelOne is the only one that hasn't been compromised as far as I understand."

"SentinelOne is a comprehensive solution for protecting SOAP-based web services and AWS-based cloud infrastructure."

"SentinelOne Vigilance has very good detection."

"SentinelOne Vigilance is a very stable solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance, which is very important for us in our company."

"The best feature of this solution is the third-party management aspect. An external company oversees the tool's management and monitors the data it generates. If the EDR detects suspicious activity, it will react accordingly and take necessary actions, such as blocking a device."

More SentinelOne Vigilance pros

Cons

"I'd suggest that Field Effect focus more on including things like phishing simulation and cybersecurity training."

"There are tags for security threats, but I only view them. I do not action anything. I just see what is happening. Sometimes, they are a little bit vague, and I am unsure what they mean, so I leave that to the IT experts. Overall, we are quite satisfied with their product and how it is working."

"I have had a couple of challenges around updates to the agents where it seems it doesn't automatically replace older versions."

"Because this is a security solution, I would recommend that they extend their support hours, and perhaps for emergencies, even to 24/7 or 24/5."

"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."

"Field Effect Covalence could benefit from enhancing its packing slip process."

"It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying."

"In terms of improvement, there are instances where the ARO responses are slightly slower than preferred."

More Field Effect MDR cons

"The tool needs improvement in clear communication and detection."

"The process to replicate exclusions is not user-friendly."

"I have found issues with the solution’s stability and implementation. The solution has performance issues. I would like the solution to launch the rollback plan for ransomware on Linux and Mac. It should be something similar to the support that Windows gets."

"It is not easy to remove the customer without the dashboard."

"It's too early to say what needs improvement."

"The support response time is not the issue, however, sometimes, the answers provided are not fully satisfactory due to the nature of the technology and issue complexity."

"I suspect that the areas for improvement may not necessarily lie within the tool itself but rather in our organization's lack of knowledge and understanding of cybersecurity. Cybersecurity is a complex area, and our organization has a skill set deficit. Therefore, we rely on our cybersecurity support company to help us manage the tool and handle incidents. Our limited expertise sometimes prevents us from fully utilizing them or identifying potential gaps."

"The solution should add endpoint clients for mobile and Linux devices because it currently doesn't support them."

More SentinelOne Vigilance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"A top-tier competitor to Field Effect in Magic Quadrant that we had been using until our switch to Field Effect was a great product, but each capability had an additional charge. We had to license modules separately, and each of those add-ons had to be added onto its own consumption and agreement. It was a nightmare from a billing perspective because we had multiple agreements, and each one had a jagged anniversary or a renewal anniversary. It was a nightmare, whereas Field Effect MDR is one product."

"The pricing is comparable to what else is out there."

"We're currently enrolled in the volume package, which offers tiered pricing based on usage."

"Covalence is cost-effective."

"While Field Effect Covalence's pricing seems competitive for the market, the biggest hurdle lies in the lack of dedicated security budgets within many organizations."

"While the contract duration might change, the pricing remains highly attractive."

"Field Effect Covalence's pricing is just right."

"The shift to a per-user pricing model and the introduction of a base price for the on-premises or virtual appliance has been particularly advantageous."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost depends on the number of connected devices and whether you purchase additional services."

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten since it is really expensive, but it is well worth what my company gets."

"The solution’s pricing is very reasonable."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten since it is a very highly-priced solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"I give the cost a three out of ten."

"The tool's pricing is slightly cheaper than other alternatives. It's not just about licensing costs; because we already have it implemented, we can save money on deployment and initial setup. Additionally, SentinelOne Vigilance is slightly cheaper in licensing, maybe around 10-15 percent cheaper."

"SentinelOne Vigilance is priced in a normal range."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

56%

Government

Non Profit

Media Company

Educational Organization

41%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

In our evaluation, two years ago, we found the Field Effect Covalence product and service to be the simplest to set up and pricing was lower than the other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

The solution could improved DNS filtering and fuller integration into ConnectWise PSA (I understand both are in the works). The current roaming DNS filter doesn't seem to be too complete and we're ...

See all answers

What do you like most about SentinelOne Vigilance?

The best feature of this solution is the third-party management aspect. An external company oversees the tool's management and monitors the data it generates. If the EDR detects suspicious activity...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Vigilance?

Price could be a factor since, with a lot of add-ons, the cost becomes high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SentinelOne Vigilance?

They've been adding a lot of products and technologies to their stack. I honestly don't have any specific improvements to suggest.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 22% of the time

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 18% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 6% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 30% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 11% of the time

Blackpoint Cyber MDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 10% of the time

Secureworks Taegis Managed XDR / MDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 9% of the time

Adlumin Cybersecurity vs SentinelOne Vigilance

Compared 5% of the time

More SentinelOne Vigilance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

January 2025

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Vigilance

December 2024

Download SentinelOne Vigilance product report

Also Known As

Field Effect Covalence

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

Field Effect

SentinelOne

Overview

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

SentinelOne Vigilance provides reliable endpoint security with features like behavior analytics and ransomware protection, offering organizations capabilities such as third-party management and effective malware detection while maintaining low resource usage and kernel-independent operations.

SentinelOne Vigilance stands out by offering robust endpoint protection, utilizing machine learning and Storyline technology to enhance malware detection and prevention. Its rollback capabilities, impressive scalability, ease of use, and comprehensive analytics are consistently acknowledged. Monthly reports offer insightful analytics, and its 100% ransomware recovery commitment adds assurance. However, areas for improvement include better integration with Microsoft Windows, SIEM, and SOAR solutions, along with enhanced dashboard control and memory forensics.

What features make SentinelOne Vigilance effective?

Reliable Endpoint Security: Protects systems with comprehensive threat detection.
Behavior Analytics: Identifies and takes action on abnormal activities.
Ransomware Protection: Includes rollback capabilities ensuring data security.
Scalability: Adapts efficiently to growing business needs.
Kernel-Independent: Operates effectively without reliance on specific kernels.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Analytics: Deep insights into security threats and responses.
Low Resource Usage: Minimizes impact on system performance.
Scalability and Ease of Use: Grows with business demands while simplifying processes.
100% Ransomware Recovery: Offers assurance against ransomware incidents.

SentinelOne Vigilance is widely implemented within industries for endpoint protection and malware detection in environments like private clouds and on-premises, aiding ransomware prevention and integration with SOC teams. Businesses across sectors rely on it to protect infrastructure and manage endpoint activities effectively.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Norwegian Airlines, TGI Fridays, AVX, FIMBank

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance

December 2024

Free Report: Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance

Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.