Field Effect MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR comparison

Field Effect and Huntress are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Field Effect is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.2, while Huntress is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.5. Field Effect holds a 3.2% mindshare in MDR, compared to Huntress’s 10.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Field Effect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Huntress users who would recommend it.

Field Effect MDR

Read 29 Field Effect MDR reviews

4,443 Views
1,011 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Huntress Managed EDR

Read 31 Huntress Managed EDR reviews

4,995 Views
3,720 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

Huntress Managed EDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 28, 2024

Huntress Managed EDR and Field Effect MDR are competing in the cybersecurity solutions category, focusing on threat detection and response. Huntress appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced threat hunting and automatic remediation features, while Field Effect excels in monitoring capabilities and comprehensive security coverage.

Features: Huntress Managed EDR offers a 24/7 Security Operations Center, threat hunting, and automatic remediation. It supports integrations with Managed Antivirus, Ransomware Canaries, and Datto RMM, providing robust security for small to medium businesses. Field Effect MDR delivers continuous monitoring and proactive threat notifications. Its integration with various cloud services ensures a comprehensive security overview, ideal for organizations needing extensive coverage.

Room for Improvement: Huntress could enhance reporting specificity and expand system integrations beyond Windows Defender. Users desire API access for improved data retrieval and integration with advanced defense tools. Better security for MAC and IoT devices is also sought. Field Effect MDR could improve automation capabilities, user interfaces, and third-party integrations. Enhancements in DNS filtering and patch management would create a more seamless user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huntress Managed EDR is praised for simple integration capabilities across hybrid and public cloud setups, coupled with highly responsive and proactive technical support. Field Effect MDR provides reliable deployments in on-premises and cloud environments, with proactive and detailed customer support. They are working to enhance automation features further.

Pricing and ROI: Huntress offers excellent value with competitive pricing and impressive ROI by reducing labor costs and managing threats efficiently. Its pricing model is attractive to MSPs seeking corporate-level security at a fair price. Field Effect MDR's pricing structure is cost-effective, charging per user rather than per system, making it advantageous for organizations with numerous devices. Despite higher costs, its extensive capabilities deliver substantial ROI, focusing on comprehensive security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

4th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Huntress Managed EDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

2nd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 3.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress Managed EDR is 10.4%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Simon Cutler

Director of Operations at Intega IT

Helps to manage cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and improve our security team's efficiency and security posture

It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying. While it's fantastic that they're proactive in this area, the time commitment is significant. Integrating patching into their existing service offering would be a game-changer. I'd love to see a tool that aids sales discovery efforts when we engage new clients. Ideally, this internal tool would scan their network environment to identify potential risks and give us a comprehensive picture of their network infrastructure. This would be a huge asset in informing our sales strategies and showcasing our expertise.

Read full review

Anto Baharian

Owner at Antra Tech

Never misses anything and has an attractive price point and a simple interface

One thing they could improve is evolving from an EDR to an MDR, like Blackpoint. This transition would enable automatic remediation of anything that looks dangerous, including within Microsoft 365. For instance, when one of my clients' Microsoft 365 account was breached, Blackpoint identified suspicious activity and disabled the account. It was in Dallas, and we are in California. Blackpoint knew something was wrong there, and they went in and disabled the account. Developing more automated remediation features would elevate them to an MDR level, but I understand that it might affect pricing. They are trying to keep it at a good price point because once they go to MDR, it is probably going to double the price. For now, I find the current features satisfactory, as they continue to add improvements. They have added security awareness training and then log collectors. They are adding pillars as they move along, and I assume they are going to have an option for MDR.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides valuable insights into our IT environment, enabling us to improve reselling, upgrades, and customer management."

"The standout feature is its continuous 24/7 monitoring of all network traffic, providing unparalleled vigilance."

"It's running in the background and does a packet-level analysis of everything that comes in. It also has an auto-response feature, so if something gets through and is clicked on, or somehow gets through the network, it gets isolated and quarantined, and we get notified."

"I get alerts if there's malicious activity or restrictions, should they any suspicious activity emerge."

"What I like the most about Field Effect Covalence is the ease of deployment, the fact that it's cost-effective to roll out, and it is reasonable."

"The most valuable feature is the network traffic monitoring function."

"It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on."

"We now have a single cybersecurity product that protects all of our threat services, and all the endpoints."

More Field Effect MDR pros

"It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry."

"The EDR tools are the most beneficial. We protect all our clients' endpoints through their security operation center, which runs through the EDR. We like that it's a small installation that doesn't take up much processing space, and we can quickly install it on our machines. We push out the agents automatically and get everybody up and running quickly."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"The EDR is the most valuable feature."

"Huntress works more simply. I appreciate how Windows Defender can be managed on computers with it. Previously, I could not modify it unless I had special Microsoft licensing, so it was beneficial to control Windows Defender through a central console to add policies and things like that."

"It is a ten out of ten in terms of ease of use."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it has a manned security operation center, not AI-driven."

"Huntress helped us to reduce the need for expensive security tools or expensive security analysts. That's very important, especially with us being a a smaller business. Not having to purchase larger software has been great."

More Huntress Managed EDR pros

Cons

"I'd suggest that Field Effect focus more on including things like phishing simulation and cybersecurity training."

"I'd love the price to be a little bit less."

"It would be greatly beneficial to integrate compliance-related reporting directly into the portal."

"It would be more effective if it could surgically isolate the specific malicious process instead of deleting the entire machine."

"The area where they can make it better is by giving responses to the end-user. For example, when there is an alert to the administrator, I get it. I have to copy and paste everything to everyone... And then I have to follow up with them, and it's a real pain."

"I'd like improved visibility into the backend data where logs are stored, along with integrations with a wider range of products."

"They could use more third-party integrations with other MSP tools."

"While the reporting is good, I would like more of a white-label option with my company's name at the top and a clean look for the report."

More Field Effect MDR cons

"I am anxiously watching to see how they evolve their MDR for Office 365. If anything, I would like more automated remediation capabilities in their MDR for Office 365."

"The reporting could be improved by providing a more simplified report that can be easily understood by clients. A way to present the data to the client so they understand its importance would be beneficial."

"We are still getting many false positives."

"The integration with our RMM could be better."

"I'd like Huntress to implement a component that can analyze network traffic for specific sites."

"Huntress has a cyber education platform, but it lacks all the languages we need. Since we support customers in different countries, expanding the language options for their training would be beneficial."

"Ultimately, the clarity of their alerts is paramount for effective threat communication and could benefit from clearer remediation steps."

"Huntress has a cyber education platform, but it lacks all the languages we need."

More Huntress Managed EDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a little pricey. It is a little on the high end, but we are continuing to use it. We signed the contract and have not canceled, so we find value in having it."

"The cost of the solution is high."

"The licensing model itself is solid, but we're ironing out some inconsistencies in how customer profiles are configured."

"Field Effect Covalence's pricing is just right."

"The pricing isn't sized, so Field Effect doesn't make it easy for anything under 25 users. I'm not crazy about that."

"Covalence is cost-effective."

"We were particularly impressed with their pricing model, which charges per user rather than per system."

"Although Covalence is expensive, it provides good value for the price."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

"It is fair. They provide good value for the product that they deliver. I have had one price increase in the entire time I have used them. They added a bunch of features and then said that they have to increase our price a little bit. That is a fair way to handle it."

"I rate the product's price a five or six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive since it is a fairly priced product."

"I rate the product pricing six out of ten for the Malaysian market. However, I would rate it a three out of ten for the Australian, New Zealand, or Singapore markets."

"The pricing is competitive, in line with Huntress's offerings, and aligns well with our business model."

"The tool’s price is very good. You just need to pay for the standard license. However, you need to pay the additional cost for Microsoft Defender."

"The Huntress pricing is an excellent value for what the product provides."

"It works well for an MSP."

"Huntress is priced fairly for the services and value it provides."

More Huntress Managed EDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

55%

Non Profit

Government

Media Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

In our evaluation, two years ago, we found the Field Effect Covalence product and service to be the simplest to set up and pricing was lower than the other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

The solution could improved DNS filtering and fuller integration into ConnectWise PSA (I understand both are in the works). The current roaming DNS filter doesn't seem to be too complete and we're ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Huntress?

It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huntress?

There should be more engagement with the MSP group or their largest clients. They should have focus group discussions on what they can do to improve the product. A more transparent way for the supp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huntress?

We use it for our clients and ourselves. Huntress is a pretty comprehensive platform. Recently, they acquired the security awareness training platform, which helps us to fulfill our clients' needs ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 22% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 21% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 16% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 12% of the time

Blackpoint Cyber MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 6% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Huntress Managed EDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

February 2025

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Huntress Managed EDR

February 2025

Download Huntress Managed EDR product report

Also Known As

Field Effect Covalence

No data available

Overview

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

Field Effect

Huntress Managed EDR offers robust managed detection and response capabilities with 24/7 threat hunting, intuitive deployment, and proactive threat management for small to medium businesses.

Huntress Managed EDR provides essential cybersecurity services to businesses by integrating seamlessly with existing tools like Microsoft Defender. Around-the-clock SOC expertise, proactive alerts, and automatic remediation define its core offerings. It effectively monitors threats, detecting footholds and malicious IPs while providing quick isolation of suspicious activities. The platform simplifies security management, reducing reliance on multiple security solutions and enhancing threat response efficiency.

What are the key features of Huntress Managed EDR?

24/7 SOC with expert threat hunting: Continuous monitoring and threat hunting by dedicated security teams.
Proactive alerts: Automated notifications for detected threats ensuring timely responses.
Automatic remediation: Swift action taken to mitigate threats without user intervention.
Easy deployment: Seamless integration with existing security infrastructures like Microsoft Defender.
Intuitive interface: User-friendly design facilitating efficient threat management and monitoring.
Foothold detection and IP scanning: Identification of persistent threats and suspicious network activities.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Seamless integration: Minimizes need for multiple security tools by interfacing well with current products.
Quick threat response: Rapid isolation and resolution of issues enhancing security posture.
Peace of mind: Reliable threat management with expert supervision ensuring continuous protection.

Huntress Managed EDR is commonly implemented in industries requiring enhanced cybersecurity, including finance, healthcare, and IT services. Its ability to complement traditional antivirus tools and integration with remote monitoring supports a comprehensive defense strategy against advanced threats. Its deployment is simplified for diverse IT environments, ensuring automated and fast response to emerging security challenges.

Huntress

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

January 2025

Free Report: Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.