Field Effect MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR comparison

Field Effect and Huntress are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Field Effect is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.2, while Huntress is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.5. Field Effect holds a 3.4% mindshare in MDR, compared to Huntress’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Field Effect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Huntress users who would recommend it.

Field Effect MDR

Read 29 Field Effect MDR reviews

4,329 Views
970 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Huntress Managed EDR

Read 25 Huntress Managed EDR reviews

4,951 Views
3,679 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

Huntress Managed EDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 28, 2024

Huntress Managed EDR and Field Effect MDR are competing in the cybersecurity solutions category, focusing on threat detection and response. Huntress appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced threat hunting and automatic remediation features, while Field Effect excels in monitoring capabilities and comprehensive security coverage.

Features: Huntress Managed EDR offers a 24/7 Security Operations Center, threat hunting, and automatic remediation. It supports integrations with Managed Antivirus, Ransomware Canaries, and Datto RMM, providing robust security for small to medium businesses. Field Effect MDR delivers continuous monitoring and proactive threat notifications. Its integration with various cloud services ensures a comprehensive security overview, ideal for organizations needing extensive coverage.

Room for Improvement: Huntress could enhance reporting specificity and expand system integrations beyond Windows Defender. Users desire API access for improved data retrieval and integration with advanced defense tools. Better security for MAC and IoT devices is also sought. Field Effect MDR could improve automation capabilities, user interfaces, and third-party integrations. Enhancements in DNS filtering and patch management would create a more seamless user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huntress Managed EDR is praised for simple integration capabilities across hybrid and public cloud setups, coupled with highly responsive and proactive technical support. Field Effect MDR provides reliable deployments in on-premises and cloud environments, with proactive and detailed customer support. They are working to enhance automation features further.

Pricing and ROI: Huntress offers excellent value with competitive pricing and impressive ROI by reducing labor costs and managing threats efficiently. Its pricing model is attractive to MSPs seeking corporate-level security at a fair price. Field Effect MDR's pricing structure is cost-effective, charging per user rather than per system, making it advantageous for organizations with numerous devices. Despite higher costs, its extensive capabilities deliver substantial ROI, focusing on comprehensive security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 829,541 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

4th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Huntress Managed EDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

2nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 3.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress Managed EDR is 10.5%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Simon Cutler

Director of Operations at Intega IT

Helps to manage cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and improve our security team's efficiency and security posture

It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying. While it's fantastic that they're proactive in this area, the time commitment is significant. Integrating patching into their existing service offering would be a game-changer. I'd love to see a tool that aids sales discovery efforts when we engage new clients. Ideally, this internal tool would scan their network environment to identify potential risks and give us a comprehensive picture of their network infrastructure. This would be a huge asset in informing our sales strategies and showcasing our expertise.

Read full review

Andy Larin

Founder and CEO at allCare IT

Effortless to use and is one of the easiest products to deploy

Huntress is effortless to use. It's one of the easiest products to deploy. Pushing out through our RMM is simple, and using it is straightforward once it's on a machine. The end user doesn't have to do anything. Everything comes back to us. I love that the alerts are human-curated. They take a look at alerts before we get them. Other products are very noisy. They'll send you an alert about anything. About 95 percent of those alerts go to Huntress first. They check to make sure that it's real and only alert us if it's actionable, something that requires our attention. When I get an alert from Huntress, it must be looked at. I love that. It saves a ton of time for my people. It can fix low-severity threats. Their team is 24/7, whereas my team is not. We want them to take action on known bad things. Sometimes, that means fixing the problem or isolating the machine so multiple machines aren't getting hit. I love that they can address those issues within a very short time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The standout feature is its continuous 24/7 monitoring of all network traffic, providing unparalleled vigilance."

"We are getting visibility over the network, not just for those hosts that have a Field Effect EDR agent but also things like the Internet of Things, guest networks, or rogue devices. We definitely have visibility into all network traffic, which is very cool."

"I appreciate the "set it and forget it" nature of Field Effect Covalence."

"It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on."

"The most valuable features are Action Recommendations of Observations, which keep us informed about existing vulnerabilities so we can proactively update our endpoints and those of our customers against potential threats."

"It's running in the background and does a packet-level analysis of everything that comes in. It also has an auto-response feature, so if something gets through and is clicked on, or somehow gets through the network, it gets isolated and quarantined, and we get notified."

"I get alerts if there's malicious activity or restrictions, should they any suspicious activity emerge."

"What I like the most about Field Effect Covalence is the ease of deployment, the fact that it's cost-effective to roll out, and it is reasonable."

More Field Effect MDR pros

"Huntress is easy to use. It immediately improved visibility and understanding of our security posture."

"Huntress' best feature is the threat-hunting expertise that is part of their 24/7 SOC."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it has a manned security operation center, not AI-driven."

"After deployment, it takes some time to scan and process everything. Huntress has effectively flagged issues such as password files on desktops, which it identifies as low-level alerts. It also handles more significant threats effectively."

"I have found it valuable that this solution is always there and always armed."

"We saw the benefits of Huntress pretty quickly. Once it started detecting threats, it was great."

"What stands out most is their human element: when faced with an unknown threat, real people, not just automated processes, are investigating it, and they're people we trust."

"Huntress is extremely well-written software. I used to be a developer, and I see how they've written it. It's excellent. I've never had an issue with it crashing a machine. It's small, tight code."

More Huntress Managed EDR pros

Cons

"I'd suggest that Field Effect focus more on including things like phishing simulation and cybersecurity training."

"If they can include an email filter system, that would be great."

"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."

"One limitation is that if someone takes their laptop outside the office building, the DNS firewall provides minimal coverage, and we are unable to generate reports."

"It would be more effective if it could surgically isolate the specific malicious process instead of deleting the entire machine."

"While Covalence addresses our notification and visibility needs, it falls short in keeping information up-to-date, which is where our MSP comes in to supplement its functionality."

"Because this is a security solution, I would recommend that they extend their support hours, and perhaps for emergencies, even to 24/7 or 24/5."

"The tagging of ARO closure has room for improvement."

More Field Effect MDR cons

"Not every time, but sometimes when we click on the remediation, the auto-resolution of the alert, the screen gets stuck, and I need to contact support so they can confirm the remediation was applied, and they have to close the ticket."

"Huntress has a cyber education platform, but it lacks all the languages we need. Since we support customers in different countries, expanding the language options for their training would be beneficial."

"The product could be improved in terms of customization options available for reports."

"We need an API to automatically retrieve metrics and data about backend activity so we can generate client reports."

"I'd like it if Huntress could scan for software that's out of date or has open vulnerabilities. That would be useful for us. Scanning for vulnerable software would be helpful. Also, we've set it up to create a ticket in our ticketing system when there's an alert. It would be nice if closing that ticket would also close the Huntress alert. It doesn't do that right now, but they're working on adding that feature."

"The integration with our RMM could be better."

"The application control system could benefit from improvements in identifying and managing both whitelisted and blacklisted applications."

"Huntress has a cyber education platform, but it lacks all the languages we need."

More Huntress Managed EDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the contract duration might change, the pricing remains highly attractive."

"The pricing is fair and reasonable."

"Field Effect Covalence's pricing is just right."

"The shift to a per-user pricing model and the introduction of a base price for the on-premises or virtual appliance has been particularly advantageous."

"The pricing is comparable to what else is out there."

"It is a little pricey. It is a little on the high end, but we are continuing to use it. We signed the contract and have not canceled, so we find value in having it."

"Although Covalence is expensive, it provides good value for the price."

"The cost of the solution is high."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

"It is simple. It is reasonable. They raised my prices this year. We never like price increases, but they continue to add value, so we just keep adding agents as we grow and as our clients grow."

"We haven't had any problems with Huntress' pricing. We're at 250 workstations, and we've grown considerably this year. They've been able to handle everything that we've thrown at them within that time frame. They're also reducing the price based on how many endpoints we add."

"It works well for an MSP."

"The pricing model for Huntress is similar to competitors and is charged per endpoint."

"I rate the product's price a five or six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive since it is a fairly priced product."

"It is fair. They provide good value for the product that they deliver. I have had one price increase in the entire time I have used them. They added a bunch of features and then said that they have to increase our price a little bit. That is a fair way to handle it."

"Huntress is an easy sell to clients because it does all the heavy lifting. Sometimes, they will buck a little at the price because they want a free antivirus or EDR. We tell them that we use Huntress on all our machines. That is our standard process for all the machines we roll out. When we give that advice, people are pretty willing to say okay."

"I rate the product pricing six out of ten for the Malaysian market. However, I would rate it a three out of ten for the Australian, New Zealand, or Singapore markets."

More Huntress Managed EDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

829,541 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

57%

Government

Non Profit

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

In our evaluation, two years ago, we found the Field Effect Covalence product and service to be the simplest to set up and pricing was lower than the other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

The solution could improved DNS filtering and fuller integration into ConnectWise PSA (I understand both are in the works). The current roaming DNS filter doesn't seem to be too complete and we're ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Huntress?

It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huntress?

Huntress has a cyber education platform, but it lacks all the languages we need. Since we support customers in different countries, expanding the language options for their training would be benefi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huntress?

We're a managed service provider, so we resell Huntress Managed EDR to our customers. We use the EDR and the MDR products, which provide endpoint and 365 protection.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 24% of the time

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 16% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 7% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 13% of the time

Blackpoint Cyber MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 8% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 2% of the time

More Huntress Managed EDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

January 2025

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Huntress Managed EDR

December 2024

Download Huntress Managed EDR product report

Also Known As

Field Effect Covalence

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

Field Effect

Huntress

Overview

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

Huntress Managed EDR offers robust managed detection and response capabilities with 24/7 threat hunting, intuitive deployment, and proactive threat management for small to medium businesses.

Huntress Managed EDR provides essential cybersecurity services to businesses by integrating seamlessly with existing tools like Microsoft Defender. Around-the-clock SOC expertise, proactive alerts, and automatic remediation define its core offerings. It effectively monitors threats, detecting footholds and malicious IPs while providing quick isolation of suspicious activities. The platform simplifies security management, reducing reliance on multiple security solutions and enhancing threat response efficiency.

What are the key features of Huntress Managed EDR?

24/7 SOC with expert threat hunting: Continuous monitoring and threat hunting by dedicated security teams.
Proactive alerts: Automated notifications for detected threats ensuring timely responses.
Automatic remediation: Swift action taken to mitigate threats without user intervention.
Easy deployment: Seamless integration with existing security infrastructures like Microsoft Defender.
Intuitive interface: User-friendly design facilitating efficient threat management and monitoring.
Foothold detection and IP scanning: Identification of persistent threats and suspicious network activities.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Seamless integration: Minimizes need for multiple security tools by interfacing well with current products.
Quick threat response: Rapid isolation and resolution of issues enhancing security posture.
Peace of mind: Reliable threat management with expert supervision ensuring continuous protection.

Huntress Managed EDR is commonly implemented in industries requiring enhanced cybersecurity, including finance, healthcare, and IT services. Its ability to complement traditional antivirus tools and integration with remote monitoring supports a comprehensive defense strategy against advanced threats. Its deployment is simplified for diverse IT environments, ensuring automated and fast response to emerging security challenges.

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

December 2024

Free Report: Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

829,541 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.