Field Effect MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR comparison

Field Effect and Huntress are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Field Effect is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.2, while Huntress is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.5. Field Effect holds a 3.3% mindshare in MDR, compared to Huntress’s 9.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Field Effect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Huntress users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 28, 2024

Huntress Managed EDR and Field Effect MDR are competing in the cybersecurity solutions category, focusing on threat detection and response. Huntress appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced threat hunting and automatic remediation features, while Field Effect excels in monitoring capabilities and comprehensive security coverage.

Features: Huntress Managed EDR offers a 24/7 Security Operations Center, threat hunting, and automatic remediation. It supports integrations with Managed Antivirus, Ransomware Canaries, and Datto RMM, providing robust security for small to medium businesses. Field Effect MDR delivers continuous monitoring and proactive threat notifications. Its integration with various cloud services ensures a comprehensive security overview, ideal for organizations needing extensive coverage.

Room for Improvement: Huntress could enhance reporting specificity and expand system integrations beyond Windows Defender. Users desire API access for improved data retrieval and integration with advanced defense tools. Better security for MAC and IoT devices is also sought. Field Effect MDR could improve automation capabilities, user interfaces, and third-party integrations. Enhancements in DNS filtering and patch management would create a more seamless user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huntress Managed EDR is praised for simple integration capabilities across hybrid and public cloud setups, coupled with highly responsive and proactive technical support. Field Effect MDR provides reliable deployments in on-premises and cloud environments, with proactive and detailed customer support. They are working to enhance automation features further.

Pricing and ROI: Huntress offers excellent value with competitive pricing and impressive ROI by reducing labor costs and managing threats efficiently. Its pricing model is attractive to MSPs seeking corporate-level security at a fair price. Field Effect MDR's pricing structure is cost-effective, charging per user rather than per system, making it advantageous for organizations with numerous devices. Despite higher costs, its extensive capabilities deliver substantial ROI, focusing on comprehensive security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 817,354 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Binary Defense MDR

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Binary Defense MDR is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 3.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress Managed EDR is 9.6%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Rich Ullom

AVP, IT Security Compliance and Audit/Information Security Officer at Western Reserve Group

Worth the money, fantastic communication, and fast service with an average response time of about four minutes on an alert

This is my third SOC. I have never had anybody react as well. So, it's hard for me to provide something that they could do better because I'm really happy with them. I just signed another three-year contract with them. I don't find any downside to them, but if I have to put one, it would be consistent manpower or staffing. The only area where the solution can be improved is going to be with people. As they grow, they are struggling with the same thing that every other company is, which is getting talent and getting that talent to stay, but they've just revised their tiering system to go from a flat analyst and manager to a three-tier solution where it goes through two or three before it gets elevated. That seems to have worked out well, so if one level misses it, the next one picks it up, and it works out fine. Consistent staffing is the only challenge they have because when you're hiring level-one analysts, you go through them pretty quickly. You'll probably hire them at 50K or 55K, and after they do it for a year, they find out they can make 85K somewhere else, and they bounce. So, their turnover is a little high, but that's it.

Read full review

Simon Cutler

Director of Operations at Intega IT

Helps to manage cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and improve our security team's efficiency and security posture

It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying. While it's fantastic that they're proactive in this area, the time commitment is significant. Integrating patching into their existing service offering would be a game-changer. I'd love to see a tool that aids sales discovery efforts when we engage new clients. Ideally, this internal tool would scan their network environment to identify potential risks and give us a comprehensive picture of their network infrastructure. This would be a huge asset in informing our sales strategies and showcasing our expertise.

Read full review

Andy Larin

Founder and CEO at allCare IT

Effortless to use and is one of the easiest products to deploy

Huntress is effortless to use. It's one of the easiest products to deploy. Pushing out through our RMM is simple, and using it is straightforward once it's on a machine. The end user doesn't have to do anything. Everything comes back to us. I love that the alerts are human-curated. They take a look at alerts before we get them. Other products are very noisy. They'll send you an alert about anything. About 95 percent of those alerts go to Huntress first. They check to make sure that it's real and only alert us if it's actionable, something that requires our attention. When I get an alert from Huntress, it must be looked at. I love that. It saves a ton of time for my people. It can fix low-severity threats. Their team is 24/7, whereas my team is not. We want them to take action on known bad things. Sometimes, that means fixing the problem or isolating the machine so multiple machines aren't getting hit. I love that they can address those issues within a very short time.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

817,354 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

58%

Non Profit

Government

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Binary Defense MDR?

The most valuable feature is reviewing tickets and the notes added by technicians.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Binary Defense MDR?

It has been good. We have saved money, and we have a better product. We are a company that has become an enterprise f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Binary Defense MDR?

We are going to have a meeting with them the following Monday. It will be our first quarterly business review. Half o...

See all answers

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

In our evaluation, two years ago, we found the Field Effect Covalence product and service to be the simplest to set u...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

The solution could improved DNS filtering and fuller integration into ConnectWise PSA (I understand both are in the w...

See all answers

What do you like most about Huntress?

It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huntress?

One issue is the managed antivirus. Huntress takes control of the antivirus built into Windows Defender, but it doesn...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huntress?

We roll Huntress out across the board. It's in our base security shield, so we use it everywhere. We also use ThreatL...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 24% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 21% of the time

Darktrace vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 21% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 18% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Binary Defense MDR

Compared 16% of the time

More Binary Defense MDR Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 25% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 17% of the time

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 15% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 8% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 14% of the time

Blackpoint Cyber MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 9% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 2% of the time

More Huntress Managed EDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Binary Defense MDR

November 2024

Download Binary Defense MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

November 2024

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Huntress Managed EDR

November 2024

Download Huntress Managed EDR product report

Also Known As

Binary Defense Vision, Binary Defense Managed Detection and Response, Binary Defense Managed Detection & Response

Field Effect Covalence

No data available

Learn More

Binary Defense

Video not available

Field Effect

Huntress

Overview

Binary Defense provides a Managed Detection and Response service using an Open XDR strategy that detects and isolates threats early in the attack lifecycle. Expert security analysts in the Binary Defense Security Operations Center leverage an attacker’s mindset, monitoring your environments for security events 24x7x365 and acting as an extension of your security teams. When a security event occurs, Binary Defense analysts triage, disposition, and prioritize the event. Analysts conduct full kill chain analysis and supply tactical and strategic mitigation recommendations to your security team with the goal of increasing your organization’s security posture against the latest adversary threats.

Visit us online at https://www.binarydefense.com

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

Huntress Managed EDR offers robust managed detection and response capabilities with 24/7 threat hunting, intuitive deployment, and proactive threat management for small to medium businesses.

Huntress Managed EDR provides essential cybersecurity services to businesses by integrating seamlessly with existing tools like Microsoft Defender. Around-the-clock SOC expertise, proactive alerts, and automatic remediation define its core offerings. It effectively monitors threats, detecting footholds and malicious IPs while providing quick isolation of suspicious activities. The platform simplifies security management, reducing reliance on multiple security solutions and enhancing threat response efficiency.

What are the key features of Huntress Managed EDR?

24/7 SOC with expert threat hunting: Continuous monitoring and threat hunting by dedicated security teams.
Proactive alerts: Automated notifications for detected threats ensuring timely responses.
Automatic remediation: Swift action taken to mitigate threats without user intervention.
Easy deployment: Seamless integration with existing security infrastructures like Microsoft Defender.
Intuitive interface: User-friendly design facilitating efficient threat management and monitoring.
Foothold detection and IP scanning: Identification of persistent threats and suspicious network activities.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Seamless integration: Minimizes need for multiple security tools by interfacing well with current products.
Quick threat response: Rapid isolation and resolution of issues enhancing security posture.
Peace of mind: Reliable threat management with expert supervision ensuring continuous protection.

Huntress Managed EDR is commonly implemented in industries requiring enhanced cybersecurity, including finance, healthcare, and IT services. Its ability to complement traditional antivirus tools and integration with remote monitoring supports a comprehensive defense strategy against advanced threats. Its deployment is simplified for diverse IT environments, ensuring automated and fast response to emerging security challenges.

Sample Customers

Securitas USA, Black Hills Energy, Lincoln Electric,The J.M. Smuckers Company, New York Community Bank, State of Connecticut, NCR

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

October 2024

Free Report: Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

817,354 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.