Field Effect MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR comparison

Field Effect and Huntress are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Field Effect is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.3, while Huntress is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.5. Field Effect holds a 3.2% mindshare in MDR, compared to Huntress’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Field Effect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Huntress users who would recommend it.

Field Effect MDR

Read 29 Field Effect MDR reviews

4,610 Views
1,058 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Huntress Managed EDR

Read 31 Huntress Managed EDR reviews

5,010 Views
3,655 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

Huntress Managed EDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Huntress Managed EDR and Field Effect Covalence compete in the managed detection and response category. Huntress appears to have the upper hand due to its simple deployment, automatic remediation, and efficient integration with existing systems, making it suitable for businesses with limited security staff.

Features: Huntress Managed EDR is noted for its threat-hunting expertise, 24/7 SOC, and automatic remediation. Its proactive operations and actionable alerts add significant value, with seamless integration into existing systems. Field Effect Covalence is recognized for continuous monitoring, real-time threat notifications, and providing a comprehensive view of network vulnerabilities, making it beneficial for organizations seeking full IT visibility.

Room for Improvement: Huntress could improve by enhancing its reporting capabilities, API integration, and dashboard intuitiveness. Users also desire deeper integration with other security solutions like XDR platforms. Field Effect Covalence would benefit from a more user-friendly interface, added patch management features, and better integration with third-party applications. Users also seek more responsive alert systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huntress Managed EDR is easily deployable across hybrid, public cloud, and on-premises systems, and is praised for its responsive and personal support. Field Effect Covalence is mainly used in on-premises and public cloud environments, offering quick, knowledgeable technical support with a strong emphasis on customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Huntress Managed EDR provides reasonably priced solutions with high ROI due to its comprehensive service that reduces the need for a full security staff. Field Effect Covalence is cost-effective for many systems per user with a per-user pricing model. Despite being generally considered expensive, it offers good value with its robust security services.

To learn more, read our detailed Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

3rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Huntress Managed EDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

2nd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 3.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress Managed EDR is 10.5%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Simon Cutler

Director of Operations at Intega IT

Helps to manage cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and improve our security team's efficiency and security posture

It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying. While it's fantastic that they're proactive in this area, the time commitment is significant. Integrating patching into their existing service offering would be a game-changer. I'd love to see a tool that aids sales discovery efforts when we engage new clients. Ideally, this internal tool would scan their network environment to identify potential risks and give us a comprehensive picture of their network infrastructure. This would be a huge asset in informing our sales strategies and showcasing our expertise.

Read full review

Anto Baharian

Owner at Antra Tech

Never misses anything and has an attractive price point and a simple interface

One thing they could improve is evolving from an EDR to an MDR, like Blackpoint. This transition would enable automatic remediation of anything that looks dangerous, including within Microsoft 365. For instance, when one of my clients' Microsoft 365 account was breached, Blackpoint identified suspicious activity and disabled the account. It was in Dallas, and we are in California. Blackpoint knew something was wrong there, and they went in and disabled the account. Developing more automated remediation features would elevate them to an MDR level, but I understand that it might affect pricing. They are trying to keep it at a good price point because once they go to MDR, it is probably going to double the price. For now, I find the current features satisfactory, as they continue to add improvements. They have added security awareness training and then log collectors. They are adding pillars as they move along, and I assume they are going to have an option for MDR.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Unlike previous solutions, where we were solely informed of security incidents, Covalence's MDR allows for real-time incident prevention."

"Direct and easy and quick communication to the Field Effect cybersecurity team experts has led to quick resolution of any problems or alerts."

"The most valuable aspect of Field MDR is the comprehensive visibility the solution offers. Most solutions cover the traditional threat landscape of computers, endpoints, servers, etc. However, there are also things happening within the network environment, such as WiFi, mobile, the Internet of Things, smart TVs, video surveillance systems, etc., that have associated vulnerabilities. Most environments do not manage or protect these assets."

"We are getting visibility over the network, not just for those hosts that have a Field Effect EDR agent but also things like the Internet of Things, guest networks, or rogue devices. We definitely have visibility into all network traffic, which is very cool."

"The standout feature is its continuous 24/7 monitoring of all network traffic, providing unparalleled vigilance."

"It is easy to manage surveillance."

"The most valuable features are AROs, which provide timely notifications for out-of-compliance or out-of-specification detections."

"The ARO alerts are helpful to use almost daily to get a sense of what actions we need to take to expedite security measures."

More Field Effect MDR pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it has a manned security operation center, not AI-driven."

"I rate Huntress Managed EDR a ten out of ten."

"The EDR product is simple to install. It is low maintenance. All the alerts go to Huntress first, and their analyst team reviews them and sends actionable things our way."

"The most valuable aspect of Huntress is its ability to isolate legacy systems from the network, preventing the spread of threats."

"It is clear, simple, and easy to use. There are things that I can automate in terms of escalation, but if I want to go into the settings and play with it, I can. They provide detailed remediation steps, explaining why an issue is a problem and what steps to take."

"What stands out most is their human element: when faced with an unknown threat, real people, not just automated processes, are investigating it, and they're people we trust."

"The most valuable aspect of Huntress Managed EDR is its personalized approach."

"I immediately recognized the benefits of Huntress Managed EDR."

More Huntress Managed EDR pros

Cons

"I'd like improved visibility into the backend data where logs are stored, along with integrations with a wider range of products."

"One limitation is that if someone takes their laptop outside the office building, the DNS firewall provides minimal coverage, and we are unable to generate reports."

"While Covalence addresses our notification and visibility needs, it falls short in keeping information up-to-date, which is where our MSP comes in to supplement its functionality."

"I have had a couple of challenges around updates to the agents where it seems it doesn't automatically replace older versions."

"They could use more third-party integrations with other MSP tools."

"Covalence's SEAS feature wasn't very user-friendly."

"In terms of improvement, there are instances where the ARO responses are slightly slower than preferred."

"The ConnectWise PSA integration is two-way but does not send our comments back to the Field Effect portal."

More Field Effect MDR cons

"One thing they could improve is evolving from an EDR to an MDR, like Blackpoint. This transition would enable automatic remediation of anything that looks dangerous, including within Microsoft 365."

"Their EDR can have increased coverage for Macintosh. They do not fully secure Macintosh computers."

"There should be more engagement with the MSP group or their largest clients. They should have focus group discussions on what they can do to improve the product. A more transparent way for the support team at Huntress and our IT team to collaborate to make it faster and easier would be beneficial."

"I'd like it if Huntress could scan for software that's out of date or has open vulnerabilities. That would be useful for us. Scanning for vulnerable software would be helpful. Also, we've set it up to create a ticket in our ticketing system when there's an alert. It would be nice if closing that ticket would also close the Huntress alert. It doesn't do that right now, but they're working on adding that feature."

"Installing Huntress on a Mac presents a challenge for end users due to the operating system's security features, which require administrator privileges for installation."

"The reporting could be improved by providing a more simplified report that can be easily understood by clients."

"We are still getting many false positives."

"We have been working on it, but their Rio agent has been having some issues trying to repair itself."

More Huntress Managed EDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Field Effect Covalence's pricing is just right."

"A top-tier competitor to Field Effect in Magic Quadrant that we had been using until our switch to Field Effect was a great product, but each capability had an additional charge. We had to license modules separately, and each of those add-ons had to be added onto its own consumption and agreement. It was a nightmare from a billing perspective because we had multiple agreements, and each one had a jagged anniversary or a renewal anniversary. It was a nightmare, whereas Field Effect MDR is one product."

"The pricing is fair and reasonable."

"Although Covalence is expensive, it provides good value for the price."

"Covalence is cost-effective."

"It is a little pricey. It is a little on the high end, but we are continuing to use it. We signed the contract and have not canceled, so we find value in having it."

"The licensing model itself is solid, but we're ironing out some inconsistencies in how customer profiles are configured."

"We're currently enrolled in the volume package, which offers tiered pricing based on usage."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

"The cost-effectiveness of Huntress is much better compared to BlackPoint. Although Huntress does not offer all the finer details that BlackPoint does, it remains much more competitive in pricing."

"I rate the product pricing six out of ten for the Malaysian market. However, I would rate it a three out of ten for the Australian, New Zealand, or Singapore markets."

"The solution's pricing is fair."

"It works well for an MSP."

"I believe Huntress offers competitive pricing overall."

"We haven't had any problems with Huntress' pricing. We're at 250 workstations, and we've grown considerably this year. They've been able to handle everything that we've thrown at them within that time frame. They're also reducing the price based on how many endpoints we add."

"The pricing model for Huntress is similar to competitors and is charged per endpoint."

"I rate the product's price a five or six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive since it is a fairly priced product."

More Huntress Managed EDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

54%

Non Profit

Government

Retailer

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

In our evaluation, two years ago, we found the Field Effect Covalence product and service to be the simplest to set up and pricing was lower than the other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

The solution could improved DNS filtering and fuller integration into ConnectWise PSA (I understand both are in the works). The current roaming DNS filter doesn't seem to be too complete and we're ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Huntress?

It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huntress?

There should be more engagement with the MSP group or their largest clients. They should have focus group discussions on what they can do to improve the product. A more transparent way for the supp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huntress?

We use it for our clients and ourselves. Huntress is a pretty comprehensive platform. Recently, they acquired the security awareness training platform, which helps us to fulfill our clients' needs ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 26% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 18% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 14% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 6% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 11% of the time

Blackpoint Cyber MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 6% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Huntress Managed EDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

March 2025

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Huntress Managed EDR

March 2025

Download Huntress Managed EDR product report

Also Known As

Field Effect Covalence

No data available

Overview

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

Field Effect

Huntress Managed EDR offers robust managed detection and response capabilities with 24/7 threat hunting, intuitive deployment, and proactive threat management for small to medium businesses.

Huntress Managed EDR provides essential cybersecurity services to businesses by integrating seamlessly with existing tools like Microsoft Defender. Around-the-clock SOC expertise, proactive alerts, and automatic remediation define its core offerings. It effectively monitors threats, detecting footholds and malicious IPs while providing quick isolation of suspicious activities. The platform simplifies security management, reducing reliance on multiple security solutions and enhancing threat response efficiency.

What are the key features of Huntress Managed EDR?

24/7 SOC with expert threat hunting: Continuous monitoring and threat hunting by dedicated security teams.
Proactive alerts: Automated notifications for detected threats ensuring timely responses.
Automatic remediation: Swift action taken to mitigate threats without user intervention.
Easy deployment: Seamless integration with existing security infrastructures like Microsoft Defender.
Intuitive interface: User-friendly design facilitating efficient threat management and monitoring.
Foothold detection and IP scanning: Identification of persistent threats and suspicious network activities.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Seamless integration: Minimizes need for multiple security tools by interfacing well with current products.
Quick threat response: Rapid isolation and resolution of issues enhancing security posture.
Peace of mind: Reliable threat management with expert supervision ensuring continuous protection.

Huntress Managed EDR is commonly implemented in industries requiring enhanced cybersecurity, including finance, healthcare, and IT services. Its ability to complement traditional antivirus tools and integration with remote monitoring supports a comprehensive defense strategy against advanced threats. Its deployment is simplified for diverse IT environments, ensuring automated and fast response to emerging security challenges.

Huntress

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

March 2025

Free Report: Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.