Field Effect MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR comparison

Field Effect and Huntress are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Field Effect is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.3, while Huntress is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.5. Field Effect holds a 3.2% mindshare in MDR, compared to Huntress’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Field Effect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Huntress users who would recommend it.

Field Effect MDR

Read 30 Field Effect MDR reviews

4,610 Views
1,058 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Huntress Managed EDR

Read 31 Huntress Managed EDR reviews

5,010 Views
3,655 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

Huntress Managed EDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Huntress Managed EDR and Field Effect Covalence compete in the managed detection and response category. Huntress appears to have the upper hand due to its simple deployment, automatic remediation, and efficient integration with existing systems, making it suitable for businesses with limited security staff.

Features: Huntress Managed EDR is noted for its threat-hunting expertise, 24/7 SOC, and automatic remediation. Its proactive operations and actionable alerts add significant value, with seamless integration into existing systems. Field Effect Covalence is recognized for continuous monitoring, real-time threat notifications, and providing a comprehensive view of network vulnerabilities, making it beneficial for organizations seeking full IT visibility.

Room for Improvement: Huntress could improve by enhancing its reporting capabilities, API integration, and dashboard intuitiveness. Users also desire deeper integration with other security solutions like XDR platforms. Field Effect Covalence would benefit from a more user-friendly interface, added patch management features, and better integration with third-party applications. Users also seek more responsive alert systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huntress Managed EDR is easily deployable across hybrid, public cloud, and on-premises systems, and is praised for its responsive and personal support. Field Effect Covalence is mainly used in on-premises and public cloud environments, offering quick, knowledgeable technical support with a strong emphasis on customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Huntress Managed EDR provides reasonably priced solutions with high ROI due to its comprehensive service that reduces the need for a full security staff. Field Effect Covalence is cost-effective for many systems per user with a per-user pricing model. Despite being generally considered expensive, it offers good value with its robust security services.

To learn more, read our detailed Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

3rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Huntress Managed EDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

2nd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 3.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress Managed EDR is 10.5%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Simon Cutler

Director of Operations at Intega IT

Helps to manage cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and improve our security team's efficiency and security posture

It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying. While it's fantastic that they're proactive in this area, the time commitment is significant. Integrating patching into their existing service offering would be a game-changer. I'd love to see a tool that aids sales discovery efforts when we engage new clients. Ideally, this internal tool would scan their network environment to identify potential risks and give us a comprehensive picture of their network infrastructure. This would be a huge asset in informing our sales strategies and showcasing our expertise.

Read full review

Anto Baharian

Owner at Antra Tech

Never misses anything and has an attractive price point and a simple interface

One thing they could improve is evolving from an EDR to an MDR, like Blackpoint. This transition would enable automatic remediation of anything that looks dangerous, including within Microsoft 365. For instance, when one of my clients' Microsoft 365 account was breached, Blackpoint identified suspicious activity and disabled the account. It was in Dallas, and we are in California. Blackpoint knew something was wrong there, and they went in and disabled the account. Developing more automated remediation features would elevate them to an MDR level, but I understand that it might affect pricing. They are trying to keep it at a good price point because once they go to MDR, it is probably going to double the price. For now, I find the current features satisfactory, as they continue to add improvements. They have added security awareness training and then log collectors. They are adding pillars as they move along, and I assume they are going to have an option for MDR.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Unlike previous solutions, where we were solely informed of security incidents, Covalence's MDR allows for real-time incident prevention."

"Hackers are trying to breach a business when they least expect it - that's often at night, weekends, and holidays. Covalence never sleeps or misses a second of monitoring."

"The AROs have been incredibly helpful."

"Direct and easy and quick communication to the Field Effect cybersecurity team experts has led to quick resolution of any problems or alerts."

"I appreciate the "set it and forget it" nature of Field Effect Covalence."

"The feature I've found the move valuable is the 24/7 monitoring."

"I like how comprehensive Field Effect Covalence is."

"Covalence's cloud protection element has been excellent. A lot of organizations are using 365. It's hard to find a secure solution for protecting accounts. We've gone down the path of trying to utilize other security solutions for that particular area. We've been disappointed and always come back to trying to implement Covalence when we can so we know people are safe."

More Field Effect MDR pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it has a manned security operation center, not AI-driven."

"Their SOC is super responsive and does a great job of catching incidences and being on top of any issues that arise."

"I have found it valuable that this solution is always there and always armed."

"We don’t have the required staff to watch the issues that are happening. It is good to have a team from Huntress who can watch the logs 24/7. The tool’s automatic remediation is also fantastic. The solution’s interface is also nice and easy to use. The Huntress team saves us time by going through the issues."

"I would absolutely recommend Huntress to other users. If you are considering it, go for it."

"I rate Huntress Managed EDR a ten out of ten."

"Users usually note improvements in a matter of days. In others, it is immediately. It varies according to the environment."

"The endpoint protection is definitely the most impactful feature for clients. It just works. It is a set-it-and-forget-it type of solution."

More Huntress Managed EDR pros

Cons

"Because this is a security solution, I would recommend that they extend their support hours, and perhaps for emergencies, even to 24/7 or 24/5."

"It would be incredibly valuable to have the Field Effect team handle some of the third-party application patching they're currently identifying."

"They put too much detail into the emails."

"The tagging of ARO closure has room for improvement."

"In terms of improvement, there are instances where the ARO responses are slightly slower than preferred."

"Field Effect Covalence could benefit from enhancing its packing slip process."

"While the reporting is good, I would like more of a white-label option with my company's name at the top and a clean look for the report."

"Covalence's SEAS feature wasn't very user-friendly."

More Field Effect MDR cons

"I am anxiously watching to see how they evolve their MDR for Office 365. If anything, I would like more automated remediation capabilities in their MDR for Office 365."

"One thing they could improve is evolving from an EDR to an MDR, like Blackpoint."

"Installing Huntress on a Mac presents a challenge for end users due to the operating system's security features, which require administrator privileges for installation."

"The reporting could be improved by providing a more simplified report that can be easily understood by clients. A way to present the data to the client so they understand its importance would be beneficial."

"We need an API to automatically retrieve metrics and data about backend activity so we can generate client reports."

"The Huntress is not a standalone solution. It really needs to be used with something else such as Microsoft Defender or another antivirus solution. It would be nice to see the product fleshed out by the Huntress team and include the antivirus solution part as well. I want it to be a full-fledged XDR product. It would push the tool to a higher price range but it would be nice to see the fleshed out features. I want them to integrate more features from the XDR realm."

"Huntress should have a more user-friendly interface because it takes some understanding to work our way through the interfaces."

"Not every time, but sometimes when we click on the remediation, the auto-resolution of the alert, the screen gets stuck, and I need to contact support so they can confirm the remediation was applied, and they have to close the ticket."

More Huntress Managed EDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Field Effect is fairly priced from my perspective. You get a lot of bang for the buck with this and a level of visibility that provides you with greater peace of mind knowing that the system is carefully monitored. You also have automated responses for known malicious behavior at any time of the day. Someone could have their Office 365 mailbox compromised at 2 in the morning on a Saturday when most people are asleep or not paying attention, and the system can prevent an issue in an automated way."

"The pricing isn't sized, so Field Effect doesn't make it easy for anything under 25 users. I'm not crazy about that."

"While Field Effect Covalence's pricing seems competitive for the market, the biggest hurdle lies in the lack of dedicated security budgets within many organizations."

"A top-tier competitor to Field Effect in Magic Quadrant that we had been using until our switch to Field Effect was a great product, but each capability had an additional charge. We had to license modules separately, and each of those add-ons had to be added onto its own consumption and agreement. It was a nightmare from a billing perspective because we had multiple agreements, and each one had a jagged anniversary or a renewal anniversary. It was a nightmare, whereas Field Effect MDR is one product."

"The cost of the solution is high."

"Field Effect Covalence's pricing is just right."

"It is on the high end, but it is worth it for the service that you get from them."

"The pricing is fair and reasonable."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

"We haven't had any problems with Huntress' pricing. We're at 250 workstations, and we've grown considerably this year. They've been able to handle everything that we've thrown at them within that time frame. They're also reducing the price based on how many endpoints we add."

"It is very fair. I started at $2.50 and now I am at $3.50. When I signed up, I thought it was too cheap. It now reflects the price. It is very fair. I do not think you can find anything better."

"It is fair. They provide good value for the product that they deliver. I have had one price increase in the entire time I have used them. They added a bunch of features and then said that they have to increase our price a little bit. That is a fair way to handle it."

"While other options have emerged since Huntress' arrival, I believe it still offers the best value for the features and services it provides."

"I believe Huntress Managed EDR is fairly priced. The value I get from it in terms of peace of mind justifies the expense. You can justify it as a business expense."

"It works well for an MSP."

"I believe Huntress offers competitive pricing overall."

"The tool’s price is very good. You just need to pay for the standard license. However, you need to pay the additional cost for Microsoft Defender."

More Huntress Managed EDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

54%

Non Profit

Government

Retailer

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?

It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

In our evaluation, two years ago, we found the Field Effect Covalence product and service to be the simplest to set up and pricing was lower than the other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

The solution could improved DNS filtering and fuller integration into ConnectWise PSA (I understand both are in the works). The current roaming DNS filter doesn't seem to be too complete and we're ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Huntress?

It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huntress?

There should be more engagement with the MSP group or their largest clients. They should have focus group discussions on what they can do to improve the product. A more transparent way for the supp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huntress?

We use it for our clients and ourselves. Huntress is a pretty comprehensive platform. Recently, they acquired the security awareness training platform, which helps us to fulfill our clients' needs ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 26% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 15% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 6% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 11% of the time

Blackpoint Cyber MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 6% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Huntress Managed EDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Huntress Managed EDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

March 2025

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Huntress Managed EDR

March 2025

Download Huntress Managed EDR product report

Also Known As

Field Effect Covalence

No data available

Overview

Field Effect MDR (Managed Detection and Response) is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect your organization's IT infrastructure. It provides multi-layered threat protection for endpoints, networks, and cloud services, ensuring no gaps in defense. The product features 24/7 threat detection and monitoring, combining advanced technology with human expertise from a Security Operations Center (SOC) to identify potential threats early. It includes automated threat response capabilities to block malware, isolate compromised devices, and prevent further damage. Additionally, it offers vulnerability management to identify and remediate system weaknesses, and risk management to analyze and mitigate risks, providing robust security for your organization.

Field Effect

Huntress Managed EDR offers robust managed detection and response capabilities with 24/7 threat hunting, intuitive deployment, and proactive threat management for small to medium businesses.

Huntress Managed EDR provides essential cybersecurity services to businesses by integrating seamlessly with existing tools like Microsoft Defender. Around-the-clock SOC expertise, proactive alerts, and automatic remediation define its core offerings. It effectively monitors threats, detecting footholds and malicious IPs while providing quick isolation of suspicious activities. The platform simplifies security management, reducing reliance on multiple security solutions and enhancing threat response efficiency.

What are the key features of Huntress Managed EDR?

24/7 SOC with expert threat hunting: Continuous monitoring and threat hunting by dedicated security teams.
Proactive alerts: Automated notifications for detected threats ensuring timely responses.
Automatic remediation: Swift action taken to mitigate threats without user intervention.
Easy deployment: Seamless integration with existing security infrastructures like Microsoft Defender.
Intuitive interface: User-friendly design facilitating efficient threat management and monitoring.
Foothold detection and IP scanning: Identification of persistent threats and suspicious network activities.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Seamless integration: Minimizes need for multiple security tools by interfacing well with current products.
Quick threat response: Rapid isolation and resolution of issues enhancing security posture.
Peace of mind: Reliable threat management with expert supervision ensuring continuous protection.

Huntress Managed EDR is commonly implemented in industries requiring enhanced cybersecurity, including finance, healthcare, and IT services. Its ability to complement traditional antivirus tools and integration with remote monitoring supports a comprehensive defense strategy against advanced threats. Its deployment is simplified for diverse IT environments, ensuring automated and fast response to emerging security challenges.

Huntress

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

March 2025

Free Report: Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Field Effect MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.