Sentinel and FileAudit compete in the file monitoring and auditing category. Sentinel holds the upper hand due to its competitive pricing and higher customer service ratings, but FileAudit’s stronger feature set gives it a significant advantage.
Features: Sentinel offers comprehensive monitoring, alert notifications, and user-friendly interfaces. FileAudit provides detailed file-access tracking, in-depth reporting, and granular access management. Both solutions are robust, but FileAudit’s detailed tracking distinguishes it.
Room for Improvement: Sentinel needs to enhance real-time alert accuracy, reduce false positives, and improve user documentation. FileAudit could streamline its setup process, offer better integration options, and enhance the user interface. The focus varies with Sentinel needing alert refinement and FileAudit requiring setup simplification.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sentinel is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. FileAudit also has easy deployment but mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness, giving Sentinel an edge in customer interaction.
Pricing and ROI: Sentinel has competitive setup costs and satisfactory ROI. FileAudit has higher setup costs, but its robust features justify the investment, leading to favorable ROI. Sentinel benefits from lower initial costs, while FileAudit offers significant value for the investment.
Sentinel is a full-featured Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution that simplifies the deployment, management and day-to-day use of SIEM, readily adapts to dynamic enterprise environments and delivers the true "actionable intelligence" security professionals need to quickly understand their threat posture and prioritize response.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.