Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Sentinel Logo

Top 10 Sentinel Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
3.8 out of 5
1,628 followers
Post review

Top Sentinel Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Sentinel based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, and Microsoft Sentinel. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Sentinel Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Sentinel excels in real-time threat detection and automated response, making it ideal for enterprises requiring advanced security. In comparison, Wazuh offers extensive customization and strong integration capabilities, appealing to smaller organizations seeking flexibility and cost efficiency. Sentinel's scalability contrasts with Wazuh's robust open-source community.
Download Sentinel vs. Wazuh Report
Sentinel has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, making it less budget-friendly for initial deployment. Conversely, Wazuh offers a more cost-effective setup, which may appeal to smaller organizations with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, making it less budget-friendly for initial deployment. Conversely, Wazuh offers a more cost-effective setup, which may appeal to smaller organizations with limited budgets.
Sentinel Logo
Sentinel Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with extensive search and custom dashboards; however, its resource consumption is high. In comparison, Sentinel offers seamless Microsoft integration and automation, but its alerting system needs refinement. Splunk's complex deployment contrasts with Sentinel’s efficient setup, though Splunk receives better customer service ratings.
Download Sentinel vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs, while Sentinel offers a lower-cost alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs, while Sentinel offers a lower-cost alternative.
Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Sentinel offers cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers needing reliable monitoring. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel's advanced analytics and integration with Microsoft services justify a higher investment. Microsoft Sentinel's feature-rich package is ideal for those seeking superior analytics and integration capabilities.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel. Microsoft Sentinel's setup is less expensive and more efficient than Sentinel's.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel. Microsoft Sentinel's setup is less expensive and more efficient than Sentinel's.
Sentinel Logo
Sentinel Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar offers advanced threat detection and customizable dashboards, making it ideal for detailed security needs. In comparison, Sentinel is known for its cloud-native architecture and easy integration, appealing to buyers focused on scalability and automation. QRadar's traditional reliability contrasts with Sentinel's cloud flexibility.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Sentinel Report
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to Sentinel's more affordable pricing, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to Sentinel's more affordable pricing, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Sentinel Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel features advanced threat detection and automated responses, making it valuable for real-time monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Security excels in flexibility and value, with powerful search capabilities and wide integration options. Sentinel's intuitive deployment contrasts with Elastic Security's complex setup, though both offer notable benefits.
Download Elastic Security vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has lower setup costs compared to Elastic Security, making it a more budget-friendly option. Elastic Security, while higher in setup costs, offers advanced features that might justify the investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has lower setup costs compared to Elastic Security, making it a more budget-friendly option. Elastic Security, while higher in setup costs, offers advanced features that might justify the investment.
Sentinel Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Sentinel excels in Azure integrations, scalable threat detection, and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those needing seamless cloud integration. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM excels in advanced threat analytics, forensic capabilities, comprehensive monitoring, and real-time analytics, making it ideal for those prioritizing robust security features and support.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel requires minimal initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while LogRhythm SIEM has a higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel requires minimal initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while LogRhythm SIEM has a higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive installation.
Sentinel Logo
Sentinel Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Sentinel excels in affordability, support, incident management, and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Sumo Logic Security delivers advanced analytics and comprehensive integration options. Sentinel’s straightforward deployment and support stand out, while Sumo Logic Security offers long-term ROI through extensive features despite higher setup costs.
Download Sentinel vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Sentinel has no setup cost while Sumo Logic Security incurs a setup cost. Sentinel offers a more cost-effective solution in terms of initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has no setup cost while Sumo Logic Security incurs a setup cost. Sentinel offers a more cost-effective solution in terms of initial setup.
Sentinel Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Both Sentinel and Rapid7 InsightIDR are advanced threat detection solutions. Sentinel is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and strong automation capabilities. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR offers extensive integration options and user-friendly dashboards, making it a comprehensive choice. Sentinel's customer support responsiveness contrasts with InsightIDR's customizable features.
Download Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has a higher initial setup cost compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a higher initial setup cost compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which offers a more affordable setup.
Sentinel Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel has advanced threat detection capabilities and flexibility, while Fortinet FortiSIEM is noted for comprehensive security features and integration. In comparison, Sentinel offers cost-effectiveness and rapid ROI. Fortinet FortiSIEM, though more expensive, provides extensive features and long-term benefits.
Download Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has a setup cost that users find more affordable compared to the higher setup cost of Fortinet FortiSIEM. Fortinet FortiSIEM offers complex initial configurations, whereas Sentinel provides easier initial deployment within budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a setup cost that users find more affordable compared to the higher setup cost of Fortinet FortiSIEM. Fortinet FortiSIEM offers complex initial configurations, whereas Sentinel provides easier initial deployment within budget constraints.
Sentinel Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.5 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.5 out of 5

Cortex XSIAM serves as SIEM and EDR, integrating automation and threat detection, designed for Security Operations Centers. It combines logs, network traffic, and data, manages incidents, and offers a cost-effective alternative to CrowdStrike. Users appreciate its machine learning threat detection and seamless integration, but seek improvements in Attack Surface Management and developer-friendliness.

Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Sentinel Report
In terms of pricing, we found Cortex XSIAM to offer a very reasonable and competitive rate.
The solution comes at a significant cost.
View comparison
Pricing
In terms of pricing, we found Cortex XSIAM to offer a very reasonable and competitive rate.
The solution comes at a significant cost.
Sentinel Logo
Sentinel Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix offers strong anomaly detection and flexible customization, making it ideal for tailored security needs. In comparison, Sentinel provides extensive cloud integrations and advanced analytics, appealing to those seeking comprehensive features. Securonix's support aids challenging setups, while Sentinel's straightforward deployment emphasizes ease of use.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Sentinel Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Sentinel offers a more affordable setup. Securonix provides robust features at a premium price, while Sentinel focuses on cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Sentinel offers a more affordable setup. Securonix provides robust features at a premium price, while Sentinel focuses on cost-effectiveness.
Sentinel Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Sentinel impresses with its real-time threat detection and comprehensive reporting capabilities, which are valuable for granular security measures. In comparison, USM Anywhere offers an all-in-one platform with asset discovery, vulnerability assessment, and intrusion detection, emphasizing an integrated approach to threat management.
Download Sentinel vs. USM Anywhere Report
Sentinel has a higher initial setup cost, whereas USM Anywhere offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a higher initial setup cost, whereas USM Anywhere offers a more cost-effective setup.
Sentinel Logo
Sentinel Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.7 out of 5
Sentinel excels with robust security features and seamless integration, ideal for strong threat detection. In comparison, ManageEngine Log360’s comprehensive auditing and broad integration capabilities offer extensive utility. ManageEngine Log360’s intuitive support materials contrast with Sentinel's swift deployment but less detailed guidance.
Download ManageEngine Log360 vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has an initial setup cost that is higher; ManageEngine Log360 offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has an initial setup cost that is higher; ManageEngine Log360 offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Sentinel Logo
Sentinel Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
4.0 out of 5
Sentinel, with its intuitive dashboard and real-time alerts, appeals for its ease of deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite stands out with advanced data analytics and exceptional threat intelligence, making it attractive for users seeking comprehensive features despite a higher cost.
Download Google Chronicle Suite vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel offers a low setup cost whereas Google Chronicle Suite provides a higher setup expense, reflecting its advanced features. Sentinel is budget-friendly, while Google Chronicle Suite targets enterprises investing in premium security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel offers a low setup cost whereas Google Chronicle Suite provides a higher setup expense, reflecting its advanced features. Sentinel is budget-friendly, while Google Chronicle Suite targets enterprises investing in premium security solutions.
Sentinel Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Sentinel is valued for its comprehensive alerting and seamless integrations, enhancing system observability. In comparison, Coralogix’s advanced machine learning algorithms deliver faster troubleshooting. Sentinel’s ease of deployment contrasts with Coralogix’s complex setup, though Coralogix's customer service excels. Sentinel offers cost-effective pricing, while Coralogix provides significant ROI.
Download Coralogix vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel's setup cost is higher, while Coralogix offers a more budget-friendly option. Sentinel provides robust features, making it ideal for larger enterprises, whereas Coralogix is suitable for cost-effective implementations without compromising essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel's setup cost is higher, while Coralogix offers a more budget-friendly option. Sentinel provides robust features, making it ideal for larger enterprises, whereas Coralogix is suitable for cost-effective implementations without compromising essential functionalities.
Sentinel Logo
Sentinel Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with automated incident response and centralized data correlation. Its seamless integration provides visibility and management. Advanced analytics and machine learning identify threats efficiently. Users appreciate its integration, real-time detection, and automation but suggest better third-party integration, documentation, and more intuitive setup.
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Sentinel Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel offers extensive features and robust security. In comparison, Logpoint is noted for user-friendliness and efficient threat detection. Sentinel excels in threat analytics, while Logpoint has an intuitive interface. Sentinel requires better integration, whereas Logpoint needs enhanced report generation. Sentinel's pricing is higher, offering advanced capabilities. Logpoint is cost-effective with a quicker ROI.
Download Logpoint vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has a medium setup cost with flexible options, while Logpoint incurs a lower initial investment with fewer customization choices. Logpoint provides a cost-effective entry point compared to Sentinel's more adaptable pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a medium setup cost with flexible options, while Logpoint incurs a lower initial investment with fewer customization choices. Logpoint provides a cost-effective entry point compared to Sentinel's more adaptable pricing.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Log Management
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)