Fiorano ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Fiorano and WSO2 are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Fiorano is ranked #10 with an average rating of 10.0, while WSO2 is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6. Fiorano holds a 1.5% mindshare in E, compared to WSO2’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fiorano users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Fiorano ESB

Read 5 Fiorano ESB reviews

351 Views
211 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 19 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,421 Views
1,005 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Fiorano ESB

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fiorano ESB and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Fiorano ESB

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Fiorano ESB is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 5.6%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

reviewer987933

Sr.Manager - Programming and software development at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 24, 2021

Scalable and easy to maintain

Our primary use case of Fiorano ESB is to expose our core banking APIs. We use Finastra's Fusion Equation, which has its own API layer and runs on an IBM machine. Nowadays, this generation of developers isn't familiar with API structures, so we converted the ESB, which is now working as a middle…

Read full review

Ilir Lazaj

Senior Consultant at Capgemini

Jun 24, 2022

Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support

There is a minor need to improve the ease of configuration. The configuration of the product is not an easy task for everyone. I agree that it has to be that way, as it's a good technology, however, maybe for people with low experience it can be hard. There can be a higher learning curve. The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution. I'd like to see the possibility of configuring the product via consoles with more elasticity without having the need to go to the single files in the file system, add the files manually, and then restarting. We'd like to make some changes, some tuning of the product, using the administration console. If this is extended to the console, it would be great. We need more operations done by the console. It simplifies the life of the worker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."

"One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."

"The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."

"The solution basically conforms to our standards."

"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."

"It was mostly easy to set up the product."

"The installation process is easy."

"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."

"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."

"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."

"The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems."

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

"You cannot include the validation of XPath."

"They should release upgrades more frequently."

"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."

"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

50%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Media Company

Computer Software Company

28%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fiorano ESB?

The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fiorano ESB?

I rate the product's pricing a five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fiorano ESB?

Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement.

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for e...

See all answers

Comparisons

Mule ESB vs Fiorano ESB

Compared 78% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs Fiorano ESB

Compared 22% of the time

More Fiorano ESB Competitors

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 13% of the time

webMethods.io vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 11% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

November 2024

Download Fiorano ESB product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

October 2024

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Learn More

Fiorano

WSO2

Overview

The Fiorano ESB implements a brokered, peer-to-peer (often referred to as super peer) system architecture, which combines the management benefits of centralized hub-and-spoke systems with the performance benefits of fully distributed peer-to-peer systems, while avoiding the particular disadvantages of both of these individual approaches.

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

Sample Customers

Polaris Transport, Harris Exelis, Aboitiz Power, Dyckerhoff AG, Gamma-Dynacare, DHL, Bajaj Finserv, Ecole hételire de Lausanne, Northern California Power Agency, Federal Bank, Commercial Bank of Africa, EasyPay, SSP, General American Corporation, Forex, Beijing Shubei Software Technology, City of Canton, Kent County Council, SJS District, County of Tulare, US Coast Guard, ZUNYI, Fraikin, Nilkamal, Posco, Toyota, UB Group

West

Buyer's Guide

Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

October 2024

Free Report: Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.