Fiorano ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Fiorano and WSO2 are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Fiorano is ranked #9 with an average rating of 10.0, while WSO2 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. Fiorano holds a 1.3% mindshare in E, compared to WSO2’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fiorano users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Fiorano ESB

Read 5 Fiorano ESB reviews

342 Views
190 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 19 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,134 Views
789 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Fiorano ESB

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Fiorano ESB and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator compete in the enterprise integration space. Fiorano ESB excels in ease of use and support, while WSO2 stands out with comprehensive features.

Features: Fiorano ESB provides robust capabilities in event-driven and service-oriented architecture integration, prioritizing simplicity. It is known for its user-friendly system, minimal development needs, and stability. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator features a vast range of integration modules, supports complex workflows, and offers a comprehensive API management suite.

Room for Improvement: Fiorano could benefit from more extensive community support and advanced customization capabilities. It may also improve its scalability options and integration module variety. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator could enhance its ease of deployment, simplify configuration, and streamline its user interface for better usability out of the box.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fiorano ESB is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive support, which boosts reliability and efficient issue resolution. Conversely, WSO2 provides scalability and requires more resources for deployment but compensates with extensive documentation and strong community assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Fiorano ESB offers a lower initial cost, providing quick ROI for small to medium applications. Its cost-efficiency aligns with straightforward integrations. WSO2, with higher setup costs, ensures significant returns through robust functionality, ideal for large enterprises, offering extended value despite premium pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fiorano ESB

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

9th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Fiorano ESB is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 5.0%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

it_user696684

Director Of Information Systems at a transportation company with 51-200 employees

Amazing what you can do with JavaScript and other scripting languages within Fiorano.

1) Ease of use 2) Little to no development needed 3) Robust micro adapters - all that i need is there 4) Easily add features with .jar files 5) Easily add features with .net 6) Amazing what you can do with JavaScript and other scripting languages within Fiorano 7) Product logging and debug features 8) Stablity - up 24x7 with no issues 9) Amazing support

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Decreases the development timeframe and costs

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems. Often, customers decide to develop using open-source tools like Spring Boot if there aren't many connectors required to avoid increasing costs. They'll develop this way and then deploy using APIM, the bare minimum needed. It is mainly required for very complicated setups with many connectors. In the implementations I've seen, people often used open-source tools because there weren't many third-party systems involved—just their organization's own systems. From WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I expect them to bring up more and more connectors in the future. That's the main expectation. Having more connectors in various areas will help us when discussing new requirements. I don't have any specific use case right now, so I can't name a particular connector. But, as new technologies emerge, the relevant connectors should be there for those. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly helps with the integration part, which can be simplified only if you have relevant connectors for whatever you're doing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."

"The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."

"One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."

"The customer service executives are very responsive."

"The solution's customer service is good."

"The connectors have been the most impactful features for handling integrations. I can use these connectors when I need specific connectivity with a third party, like a core banking system in BFSI. I don't need to do all the development. I take the specific connector, put in the IP address and password, and it takes care of everything."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

"The learning curve for this solution is very good."

"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."

"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."

"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."

"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."

"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"The integration capabilities need to be improved."

"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."

"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."

"The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems."

"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fiorano ESB?

The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fiorano ESB?

I rate the product's pricing a five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fiorano ESB?

Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement.

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

See all answers

Comparisons

Mule ESB vs Fiorano ESB

Compared 100% of the time

More Fiorano ESB Competitors

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 23% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 14% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 11% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 11% of the time

webMethods.io vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

March 2025

Download Fiorano ESB product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

March 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Overview

The Fiorano ESB implements a brokered, peer-to-peer (often referred to as super peer) system architecture, which combines the management benefits of centralized hub-and-spoke systems with the performance benefits of fully distributed peer-to-peer systems, while avoiding the particular disadvantages of both of these individual approaches.

Fiorano

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Polaris Transport, Harris Exelis, Aboitiz Power, Dyckerhoff AG, Gamma-Dynacare, DHL, Bajaj Finserv, Ecole hételire de Lausanne, Northern California Power Agency, Federal Bank, Commercial Bank of Africa, EasyPay, SSP, General American Corporation, Forex, Beijing Shubei Software Technology, City of Canton, Kent County Council, SJS District, County of Tulare, US Coast Guard, ZUNYI, Fraikin, Nilkamal, Posco, Toyota, UB Group

West

Buyer's Guide

Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

March 2025

Free Report: Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fiorano ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.