Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Firebolt vs Snowflake Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Firebolt
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
14th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Snowflake Analytics
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Web Analytics (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Firebolt is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snowflake Analytics is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
 

Featured Reviews

Iqbal Hossain Raju - PeerSpot reviewer
Can quickly query it to generate quick results
We have used Snowflake before. We support both. Firebolt has better performance, executing queries much quicker than Snowflake. However, Snowflake has more functionality. Depending on the client's needs, we can recommend the best option. Firebolt is a relatively new technology. Snowflake has many functionalities. Firebolt does not support unloading data to S3. There is no built-in way to do this in Firebolt. Alternatively, the data can be retrieved using API calls and loaded to S3 manually. Data can be unloaded to S3 directly using Snowflake. Firebolt significantly improves our performance over Snowflake because it takes less time to execute queries. This is especially important for our company because we use some KPIs that require fast loading times.
Manoj Kambli - PeerSpot reviewer
For processing data, it can be easily optimized and supports structured and unstructured data
In terms of cost. Many customers face issues with the expenses on Snowflake. The pricing visibility is complex. If you understand pricing, you can estimate costs, but if not, it can be challenging. They need to provide better cost visibility upfront. For example, credits are not always utilized properly, which isn't easy for new users. A more user-friendly cost calculator would help, as the current one requires expertise to use effectively. These things are not easy for someone who is new to Snowflake, unlike Azure's calculators, which give good visibility into the cost. It does have a calculator, but you need to be skilled in using it. Otherwise, it's hard to estimate the total cost for future loads. For additional features, there could be its own AI model like Google has Gemini. Snowflake can come up with those kinds of features for Analytics. If you can just type in your prompt and get answers, especially for Analytics people on the client side, they will love that. Like, in Google's Gemini, you type the prompt and get the answers based on the data available. If they come up with that kind of AI and UI, it will be easier for clients to analyze their data. They can just type a query like, "What is my highest selling product?" They don't have to write a complex query.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Firebolt is fast for analytical purposes. For example, we have analytical data in our data warehouse, and Firebolt can quickly query it to generate quick results."
"It is quite a convenient tool."
"It's cloud-based technology, so users can spin it up a lot faster"
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Deployment is straightforward as it's a SaaS product. No maintenance required."
"One advantage is that installation is unnecessary since it's cloud-based. You subscribe to a Snowflake instance, configure it, and start using it. It's very user-friendly and allows you to scale up or down based on usage."
"Its structure aids in storing, managing, and analyzing large datasets in the cloud, using various relationships like one-to-one and many-to-one, ensuring consistency in the data structure."
"It helps with business intelligence by providing analytics that can be reported."
"The most valuable feature of Snowflake Analytics is the ability to control and manage the cost."
 

Cons

"Firebolt's engine takes a long time to start because it needs to make engine calls."
"Snowflake could improve in the areas of advanced machine learning AML and generative AI."
"Snowflake should include a WHERE clause for building data pipelines."
"The UI must be improved."
"A room for improvement in Snowflake Analytics is Spark, particularly its connector for Spark. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is built-in analytics."
"Machine learning in Snowflake isn't as advanced as in other products. I haven't heard of any successful industry-wide use cases of machine learning implemented in Snowflake. It might take a couple of years to reach the same level as Databricks."
"The technical support is not very good."
"Moving data from legacy systems to Snowflake is not that easy. There are some cases where processors are not actually compatible with Snowflake."
"The distribution methodology isn't as strong as Bethesda or SAP HANA. It's not as strong as other competitors."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product's pricing is subjective."
"When using Snowflake, you pay based on your usage. They calculate how much CPU has been used. If you use excess warehouse storage, you are charged one credit per hour. If you are in Asia, you are charged $3 per credit. If you have 10 users running parallel with the same excess, you will be charged $30."
"It is an expensive solution, but the kind of usability and flexibility it proactively provides for the organizations justify the price."
"The tool is quite expensive."
"It is not overly expensive. I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."
"The cost of Snowflake Analytics is low, any small organization can use it."
"The solution's price is high and I would rate it an eight out of ten."
"It's not costly if you configure it properly to ensure optimal performance. People don't configure it properly, which is why costs go up."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
825,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Retailer
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Firebolt?
Firebolt is fast for analytical purposes. For example, we have analytical data in our data warehouse, and Firebolt can quickly query it to generate quick results.
What needs improvement with Firebolt?
Firebolt's engine takes a long time to start because it needs to make engine calls. Currently, the data size of Firebolt is small. It can be increased.
What advice do you have for others considering Firebolt?
One way to retrieve data from firewalls is to add query parameters to the connection string. For example, you can use the REST API to retrieve the security query. Some firewalls have been deployed ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snowflake Analytics?
We don't handle the price part. However, our customer is happy with our services regarding Snowflake Analytics.
What needs improvement with Snowflake Analytics?
When we insert data into a large table, it takes a lot of time. This performance issue can be improved.
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Lionsgate, Adobe, Sony, Capital One, Akamai, Deliveroo, Snagajob, Logitech, University of Notre Dame, Runkeeper
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Microsoft, Google and others in Cloud Data Warehouse. Updated: December 2024.
825,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.