Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fischer Identity as a Service vs Oracle Identity Governance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Oracle Identity Governance scales well for medium to large enterprises, though high user loads may cause performance issues.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
Oracle Identity Governance automates identity lifecycle, offering role-based access, seamless integration, scalable management, and robust analytics features.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.2
Oracle Identity Governance needs UI upgrades, better integration, improved support, cost reduction, and AI-driven enhancements for user-friendliness.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.2
Oracle Identity Governance's stability is generally above average, with occasional issues resolved through tuning, support, and high availability.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.5
Oracle Identity Governance support experiences vary, with performance influenced by relationships, regional factors, and individual agent expertise.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
1.5
Oracle Identity Governance's high costs challenge smaller organizations, but large enterprises find value in its comprehensive features.
 

Categories and Ranking

Fischer Identity as a Service
Ranking in User Provisioning Software
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (32nd)
Oracle Identity Governance
Ranking in User Provisioning Software
7th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (14th), Mobile Identity (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the User Provisioning Software category, the mindshare of Fischer Identity as a Service is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Identity Governance is 6.5%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Provisioning Software
 

Featured Reviews

Use Fischer Identity as a Service?
Share your opinion
Amimesh Anand - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers reliability through features associated with RBAC
Upgrading and making changes to the product is very difficult. It is difficult when you are upgrading the product because sometimes you cannot directly upgrade from one version to another version. You have to go to the lower version and then upgrade to the higher version, which is the biggest drawback of Oracle products. There are no additional features in the tool currently, and it has been the same for the last ten years. I want to see AI features in the tool so it becomes easy for implementers. There should be a change in the installation and deployment part, which is very heavy, due to which the team requires a lot of time, like two to three weeks. It should be easy to implement the tool in two or three days.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
77%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Retailer
1%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Oracle Identity Governance?
Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access restrictions based on role-based policies were beneficial.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Identity Governance?
Price-wise, the tool is a little bit costly. If you are going for the short term, like one year or two years, the tool is very cost-effective. The only problem with Oracle is that the implementatio...
What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Governance?
Upgrading and making changes to the product is very difficult. It is difficult when you are upgrading the product because sometimes you cannot directly upgrade from one version to another version. ...
 

Also Known As

Fischer Identity-as-a-Service
Oracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA)
Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.