Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Oracle Identity Governance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager enhances security by automating tasks, improving compliance, reducing breaches, and increasing efficiency and ROI.
Sentiment score
7.1
Organizations experienced mixed ROI from Oracle Identity Governance, with efficiency gains but inconsistent performance and financial returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
CyberArk's support is efficient and knowledgeable, but challenges exist in response times, communication, and handling complex cases.
Sentiment score
5.5
Oracle Identity Governance support experiences vary, with performance influenced by relationships, regional factors, and individual agent expertise.
Response times seem to correlate with the strength of the relationship with the CyberArk account manager, with quicker responses when rapport is strong.
They are helpful, but complex issues can take a long time to resolve, which can delay solutions for urgent customer issues.
CyberArk's customer service has improved recently and is now very responsive.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is highly scalable and versatile, though complexity in licensing and configurations may pose challenges.
Sentiment score
6.9
Oracle Identity Governance scales well for medium to large enterprises, though high user loads may cause performance issues.
We started small and expanded it to an enterprise level, and are now moving to the cloud for further growth.
We have different operating systems, database systems, and decentralized infrastructure.
I find SaaS to be more promising in scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable, with issues mainly from configuration, infrastructure, or resource limitations rather than the software.
Sentiment score
6.1
Oracle Identity Governance's stability is generally above average, with occasional issues resolved through tuning, support, and high availability.
Proper fine-tuning and expertise ensure the product performs well.
Overall, the stability of the solution is high.
It has a large customer base and positive feedback within my network.
 

Room For Improvement

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager needs UI, integration, and performance improvements, simpler setup, cost-effectiveness, and more plugins for usability.
Oracle Identity Governance needs UI upgrades, better integration, improved support, cost reduction, and AI-driven enhancements for user-friendliness.
They want everything to be on the cloud, but even in the SaaS version of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, they need to deploy some servers on-premises.
In the long term, I would like to see these processes simplified, especially for on-premise installations.
Incorporating automated onboarding and offboarding features directly into the product would reduce the maintenance burden on administrators.
 

Setup Cost

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is costly, especially for small businesses, though discounts exist for larger purchases.
Oracle Identity Governance's high costs challenge smaller organizations, but large enterprises find value in its comprehensive features.
CyberArk is expensive compared to other products I know.
CyberArk's SaaS solution is particularly expensive.
CyberArk is comparatively expensive compared to other PAM solutions, such as Delinea, especially during renewal.
 

Valuable Features

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager enhances security with password management, session monitoring, integration flexibility, and real-time auditing for compliance.
Oracle Identity Governance automates identity lifecycle, offering role-based access, seamless integration, scalable management, and robust analytics features.
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager helps ensure data privacy because we now know who is using which credentials and at what time.
For me, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's most valuable features are password and session management.
After giving access, it continually checks if the user is the same user.
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Privileged Access ...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
197
Ranking in other categories
User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (3rd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (1st), Mainframe Security (2nd), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)
Oracle Identity Governance
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (7th), Identity Management (IM) (16th), Mobile Identity (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is designed for Privileged Access Management (PAM) and holds a mindshare of 20.9%, down 23.8% compared to last year.
Oracle Identity Governance, on the other hand, focuses on Identity Management (IM), holds 2.9% mindshare, down 3.9% since last year.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Identity Management (IM)
 

Featured Reviews

SatishIyer - PeerSpot reviewer
Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK
When I was a component owner for PAM's Privileged Threat Analytics (PTA) component, what I wanted was a clear mapping to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, a framework which has a comprehensive list of use cases. We reached out to the vendor and asked them how much coverage they have of the uses cases found on MITRE, which would have given us a better view of things while I was the product owner. Unfortunately they did not have the capability of mapping onto MITRE's framework at that time. PTA is essentially the monitoring interface of the broker (e.g. Privileged Access Management, the Vault, CPM, PSM, etc.), and it's where you can capture your broker bypass and perform related actions. For this reason, we thought that this kind of mapping would be required, but CyberArk informed us that they did not have the capability we had in mind with regard to MITRE ATT&CK. I am not sure what the situation is now, but it would definitely help to have that kind of alignment with one of the more well-known frameworks like MITRE. For CyberArk as a vendor, it would also help them to clearly spell out in which areas they have full functionality and in which ares they have partial or none. Of course, it also greatly benefits the customers when they're evaluating the product.
Amimesh Anand - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers reliability through features associated with RBAC
Upgrading and making changes to the product is very difficult. It is difficult when you are upgrading the product because sometimes you cannot directly upgrade from one version to another version. You have to go to the lower version and then upgrade to the higher version, which is the biggest drawback of Oracle products. There are no additional features in the tool currently, and it has been the same for the last ten years. I want to see AI features in the tool so it becomes easy for implementers. There should be a change in the installation and deployment part, which is very heavy, due to which the team requires a lot of time, like two to three weeks. It should be easy to implement the tool in two or three days.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
32%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
78%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
4%
University
1%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?
We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...
What do you like most about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution are control and analytics.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager comes at a high cost. But the solution is worth its price.
What do you like most about Oracle Identity Governance?
Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access restrictions based on role-based policies were beneficial.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Identity Governance?
Price-wise, the tool is a little bit costly. If you are going for the short term, like one year or two years, the tool is very cost-effective. The only problem with Oracle is that the implementatio...
What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Governance?
Upgrading and making changes to the product is very difficult. It is difficult when you are upgrading the product because sometimes you cannot directly upgrade from one version to another version. ...
 

Also Known As

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault
Oracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.