Forcepoint ZTNA vs Portnox comparison

Forcepoint and Portnox Security are both solutions in the ZTNA category. Forcepoint is ranked #19, while Portnox Security is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1. Forcepoint holds a 1.5% mindshare in Z, compared to Portnox Security’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Portnox Security users who would recommend it.

Forcepoint ZTNA

Read 1 Forcepoint ZTNA review

453 Views
417 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portnox

Read 29 Portnox reviews

3,443 Views
792 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Forcepoint ZTNA

Portnox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Portnox and Forcepoint ZTNA compete in network security management. While Portnox is praised for its cost-effectiveness and support, Forcepoint ZTNA outperforms with advanced feature sets, warranting its higher expense for extensive security needs.

Features: Portnox offers intuitive network visibility, efficient device management, and automated onboarding for SMBs. Forcepoint ZTNA provides a robust zero trust architecture, data loss prevention, and advanced threat protection preferred by enterprises seeking comprehensive security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox is known for easy deployment and accessible customer service. Forcepoint ZTNA, while more complex to implement, delivers in-depth technical support for challenging environments. Portnox ensures a quick start, whereas Forcepoint's support is beneficial for large-scale implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox offers a budget-friendly setup with a good ROI for cost-conscious businesses. Despite Forcepoint ZTNA's higher initial cost, it provides ROI through extensive security capabilities, appealing to organizations prioritizing long-term gains over initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 890,071 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint ZTNA

Ranking in ZTNA

19th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Portnox

Ranking in ZTNA

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (6th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of Forcepoint ZTNA is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portnox is 3.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ZTNA Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Portnox	3.4%
Forcepoint ZTNA	1.5%
Other	95.1%

ZTNA

Featured Reviews

AbhijeethReetoo

Business Development Management at a computer retailer with 501-1,000 employees

You can add multiple features on a single agent, but it's an expensive product, and its marketing approach should be more aggressive

Forcepoint ZTNA isn't well-known in the market. Right now, it's a novice, so an area for improvement in it is making the product known. Forcepoint should create more awareness about Forcepoint ZTNA because a distributor like me still needs to promote it more to customers. Forcepoint has to capitalize on, focus on, or highlight its overall approaches to Forcepoint ZTNA marketing, such as SASE or SSE, to sell the whole bundle rather than as a standalone product. Today, most customers move to the cloud, so the whole SSE or SASE approach makes better sense. Forcepoint needs to look at the whole picture. I suggest being more aggressive in marketing to boost customer awareness of Forcepoint ZTNA.

Read full review

Maurice Mwaura

Product Manager at Applied Principles Limited

Unified access control has improved compliance visibility and simplified passwordless access

There is work to be done when it comes to making the solution more seamless. For example, when a user is denied access, they would need a way to maybe self-resolve themselves, perhaps a way to generate a ticket on their own, something around resolutions. When it comes to users using the product, that is where good products are differentiated from products that are a bit of a challenge. Portnox has much to do in terms of their reporting. The generated reports need improvement. Things that other tools would say are normal are usually not present. For example, there is a page called NAS devices or NAS network that is able to show the switches that have been managed. Currently, there is no way of generating an easy report or an easy way of just generating something to tell the customer what they have been able to achieve so far. This is not done yet and is still very manual. I think there is work to be done there. More integrations around the various products being used would be beneficial. So far I have not encountered any major challenge. Where there was a challenge, I think support came in and helped us resolve. In fact, most of the challenges are not with the product; they are with the customer environment. I think that is just to update their documentation where they have come across a new vendor for easier integrations in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like about Forcepoint ZTNA is that you could use it as a starting point because you have one agent that allows you to add more features. Other technologies require one agent per solution, so you'll end up with multiple agents."

"The cloud-based feature of Portnox is excellent."

"Portnox helped to free up staff time and resources for other IT security priorities and IT work."

"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."

"Portnox saves me about fifty percent of my time."

"The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility."

"The ability of the product to search the entire network and know what you have hidden on your network."

"I'd recommend others to use it; it's easier to use and has this GUI that can give you more visibility to all you are doing on the device, and also it gives you a more analytic view of the people that are trying to connect."

More Portnox pros

Cons

"Forcepoint ZTNA isn't well-known in the market. Right now, it's a novice, so an area for improvement in it is making the product known. Forcepoint should create more awareness about Forcepoint ZTNA because a distributor like me still needs to promote it more to customers."

"The licensing is based on a per-port price, even when you are not using all of the ports, and this is something that could be improved."

"There is work to be done when it comes to making the solution more seamless."

"Portnox can occasionally knock out a switch port, causing network downtime and requiring manual reset."

"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."

"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."

"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."

"Portnox has design considerations that limit its applicability."

"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."

More Portnox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Ninety percent of the feedback I received from company partners is that Forcepoint ZTNA is an expensive product."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

"The vendor price is fair."

"The solution is very expensive and I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"Pricing is quite reasonable."

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox Clear?

Regarding hidden maintenance costs, I would say I have never encountered a challenge where Portnox was not able to work or where I told the customer to do any major infrastructural changes. Even be...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox Clear?

I used to have difficulty sometimes with VPN in Portnox, but in general, I am not sure about areas for improvement. I did not try the mobile application, and the documentation is important because ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Portnox Clear?

From customer to customer, the use case for Portnox is different. Some customers ask for a network to protect their board and local network, while others want to allow employees to access via VPN a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 67% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ZTA vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 33% of the time

More Forcepoint ZTNA Competitors

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 13% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 11% of the time

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) vs Portnox

Compared 8% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 8% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

April 2026

Download Forcepoint ZTNA product report

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

April 2026

Download Portnox product report

Also Known As

No data available

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Forcepoint

Portnox Security

Overview

Implement Zero Trust policies easily, verifying remote workers and giving them access to only the private apps they need – not all apps in internal data centers and private clouds. Protect internal apps against potentially compromised remote devices and data theft.

Forcepoint

Portnox provides advanced network visibility and proactive security without complexity, ensuring easy setup and scalability. Its agentless nature and intuitive design enable seamless device management and system integration, promoting efficient network operations and endpoint security.

Portnox is known for offering comprehensive network access control, providing firms with vital tools for managing authentication and securing endpoint devices. It's praised for ease of use in integrating with systems such as RADIUS servers and offering detailed analytical capabilities to ensure compliance and control unauthorized access. While users appreciate the intuitive interface and device management, improvements have been suggested in the areas of better GUI, integration with firewalls, and enhanced configuration methods. Portnox aids in handling dynamic VLAN assignments and securing access in both wired and wireless networks, proving particularly valuable for on-premises and remote environments.

What are the key features of Portnox?

Network Visibility: Offers comprehensive oversight of network activities.
Agentless Setup: Ensures easy implementation with minimal disruption.
Compliance Checks: Provides tools for compliance verification and incident reporting.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing IT systems for efficient management.

What benefits should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Prioritizes proactive measures to secure endpoints.
Easy Management: Facilitates straightforward device handling and network control.
Efficiency: Streamlines network operations for better performance.
Scalability: Adapts to organizational growth without complexities.

In industries where network security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Portnox is implemented to fortify access control and manage endpoint connections effectively. Its ability to secure both on-premises and remote environments makes it a versatile choice across sectors that require stringent access management, particularly where unauthorized device connections pose significant risks.

Portnox Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Tailscale, Check Point Software Technologies and others in ZTNA. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

890,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.