Forcepoint ZTNA vs Portnox comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Forcepoint and Portnox Security are both solutions in the ZTNA category. Forcepoint is ranked #23, while Portnox Security is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Forcepoint holds a 1.3% mindshare in Z, compared to Portnox Security’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Portnox Security users who would recommend it.

Forcepoint ZTNA

Read 1 Forcepoint ZTNA review

874 Views
839 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portnox

Read 40 Portnox reviews

6,471 Views
2,006 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Forcepoint ZTNA

Portnox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Portnox and Forcepoint ZTNA are competing products in the network security and Zero Trust Network Access space. Portnox often receives more favorable comments on its pricing and support, while Forcepoint ZTNA is perceived as offering a more robust feature set, suggesting the cost is justified by its capabilities.

Features: Portnox offers excellent NAC capabilities focusing on simplicity, flexibility in network access management, and seamless integration with network devices. It prioritizes runtime threat detection and compliance management. Forcepoint ZTNA provides comprehensive security through granular access controls and advanced data protection layers, integrating seamlessly across cloud environments. The primary difference is Portnox's focus on ease of access control versus Forcepoint's deeper security framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox is known for easy implementation, straightforward operations, and strong technical support. Conversely, Forcepoint ZTNA offers a robust deployment model that can be complex due to its extensive feature set, requiring more technical insight.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox generally provides a more appealing pricing model with transparent packages, resulting in a favorable cost-to-benefit ratio. In contrast, Forcepoint ZTNA, while having a higher upfront cost, presents considerable value through extensive security offerings, indicating sound ROI for businesses needing comprehensive security.

To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,517 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint ZTNA

Ranking in ZTNA

23rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Portnox

Ranking in ZTNA

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (5th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of Forcepoint ZTNA is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portnox is 3.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ZTNA Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Portnox	3.2%
Forcepoint ZTNA	1.3%
Other	95.5%

ZTNA

Featured Reviews

AbhijeethReetoo

Business Development Management at a computer retailer with 501-1,000 employees

You can add multiple features on a single agent, but it's an expensive product, and its marketing approach should be more aggressive

Forcepoint ZTNA isn't well-known in the market. Right now, it's a novice, so an area for improvement in it is making the product known. Forcepoint should create more awareness about Forcepoint ZTNA because a distributor like me still needs to promote it more to customers. Forcepoint has to capitalize on, focus on, or highlight its overall approaches to Forcepoint ZTNA marketing, such as SASE or SSE, to sell the whole bundle rather than as a standalone product. Today, most customers move to the cloud, so the whole SSE or SASE approach makes better sense. Forcepoint needs to look at the whole picture. I suggest being more aggressive in marketing to boost customer awareness of Forcepoint ZTNA.

Read full review

Maurice Mwaura

Product Manager at Applied Principles Limited

Unified access control has improved compliance visibility and simplified passwordless access

There is work to be done when it comes to making the solution more seamless. For example, when a user is denied access, they would need a way to maybe self-resolve themselves, perhaps a way to generate a ticket on their own, something around resolutions. When it comes to users using the product, that is where good products are differentiated from products that are a bit of a challenge. Portnox has much to do in terms of their reporting. The generated reports need improvement. Things that other tools would say are normal are usually not present. For example, there is a page called NAS devices or NAS network that is able to show the switches that have been managed. Currently, there is no way of generating an easy report or an easy way of just generating something to tell the customer what they have been able to achieve so far. This is not done yet and is still very manual. I think there is work to be done there. More integrations around the various products being used would be beneficial. So far I have not encountered any major challenge. Where there was a challenge, I think support came in and helped us resolve. In fact, most of the challenges are not with the product; they are with the customer environment. I think that is just to update their documentation where they have come across a new vendor for easier integrations in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like about Forcepoint ZTNA is that you could use it as a starting point because you have one agent that allows you to add more features. Other technologies require one agent per solution, so you'll end up with multiple agents."

"The simplicity of the product is commendable."

"It's a stable product."

"This is a self-sufficient network monitoring and security product that saves time and employee resources."

"The most important of all is that we are aware of situations the minute anyone on the network has issues, with a very good graphical interface that shows us exactly where the issue is and what ports it is occurring at, making it a lot easier for us to troubleshoot network issues and helping with uptime and productivity."

"My impression of the universal zero-trust platform offered by Portnox is that it is a strong solution that is easy to manage, improves network security, and provides centralized control over user and device access."

"Overall, the platform helps strengthen security while remaining easy to deploy, manage, and scale as organizational requirements evolve."

"Portnox has positively impacted my organization by improving visibility into connected devices, strengthening access control through zero trust policies, and automating compliance enforcement."

"Portnox is better than other solutions that I tried before, at least with Cisco, because it has lots of features that are not included in Cisco, so it is the best for me."

More Portnox pros

Cons

"Forcepoint ZTNA isn't well-known in the market. Right now, it's a novice, so an area for improvement in it is making the product known. Forcepoint should create more awareness about Forcepoint ZTNA because a distributor like me still needs to promote it more to customers."

"The Wi-Fi integration could be done better from their end."

"I do not have anything in mind for Portnox to improve, perhaps except for the interface to make it much easier to use."

"The price could be better."

"Regarding improvements, maybe in terms of integration, they could look into something the guest captive portal features."

"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."

"There is room for improvement regarding Portnox's pricing strategies."

"In Portnox, the area that has room for improvement is that older data is not fetching correctly."

"One area for improvement would be deeper reporting and analytics capabilities for Portnox, particularly for long-term trend analysis and compliance reporting."

More Portnox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Ninety percent of the feedback I received from company partners is that Forcepoint ZTNA is an expensive product."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"Pricing is quite reasonable."

"Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The vendor price is fair."

"The cost of Portnox Clear is reasonable."

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

"Portnox CORE's pricing is adequate and cheaper compared to other complex solutions. Its licensing costs are yearly and include support. Cost is calculated per device."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox Clear?

Overall, our experience with Portnox pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been very positive. One of the key advantages is the cloud-native licensing model, which eliminates the need for signific...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox Clear?

During my daily use, I noticed that if you have many devices being managed by a particular server, any device being managed by that server takes quite a bit of time to respond. If you log into Port...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Portnox Clear?

Portnox was primarily used for network access control, which granted access to enterprise devices based on specific parameters that we set. A specific example of how I used Portnox for network acce...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 54% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ZTA vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 37% of the time

Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 4% of the time

More Forcepoint ZTNA Competitors

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 10% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 9% of the time

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) vs Portnox

Compared 8% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 6% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

August 2026

Download Forcepoint ZTNA product report

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

August 2026

Download Portnox product report

Also Known As

No data available

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Forcepoint

Portnox Security

Overview

Forcepoint ZTNA delivers comprehensive scalable zero trust architecture, effectively managing secure access for remote and mobile workforces by verifying identity at each access point.

Forcepoint ZTNA offers user-friendly integration and seamless zero trust implementation by prioritizing secure connectivity. It refines how modern businesses control network access, addressing security challenges faced by decentralized working environments. By combining identity verification and context analysis, the platform ensures that access is only granted under defined conditions, significantly reducing potential attack vectors.

What are Forcepoint ZTNA's key features?

Granular Access Control: Tailors access based on user identity and context.
Identity-based Security: Manages permissions with precision using identity verification.
Seamless Integration: Eases deployment within existing IT infrastructures.
Real-time Monitoring: Provides continuous threat assessment and response.
Scalability: Adapts to fluctuating demands and various user counts.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from reviews?

Enhanced Security: Defined access minimizing unauthorized entry.
Agility: Improved reaction to workload changes without compromising security.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces need for expensive hardware upgrades.
User Satisfaction: Intuitive controls leading to ease of use.

Forcepoint ZTNA sees diverse implementations, notably in healthcare, where privacy and security safeguards are vital, and in finance, securing sensitive transactions and data exchanges. Its adaptability meets strict industry regulations, making it highly suited to environments with stringent security demands.

Forcepoint

Portnox NAC is a cloud-native network access control solution built for today's hybrid, distributed enterprises. Get real-time visibility into every device on your network, enforce risk-based access policies automatically, and maintain continuous compliance — all without deploying a single on-premises appliance.

----------

About Portnox Security

Portnox is a cloud-native enterprise access control provider that helps organizations secure every identity - human and non-human - across networks, applications, and infrastructure. As identities, devices, and workloads multiply across modern environments, Portnox enables continuous access verification based on identity context, device posture, and risk signals. Its unified platform brings together passwordless authentication, access control, continuous policy enforcement, and automated response through a single policy engine.

Portnox gives security and IT teams real-time visibility into everything connecting and the ability to quickly restrict, quarantine, or revoke non-compliant access. Today, Portnox actively manages more than one million devices worldwide, secures 40 million authentication sessions, and blocks over one million unauthorized access attempts every day. Learn more at portnox.com.

CAPABILITIES:

• Discover and assess users, devices, and identities connecting to corporate resources

• Unify continuous zero trust access control on networks, applications, and infrastructure

• Enforce identity- and context-aware access policies

• Enable secure remote work without complexity

• Deliver passwordless authentication, device posture checks, and continuous access enforcement

• Control administrative access to routers, switches, firewalls, and other network devices

• Improve audit readiness with visibility, access logs, and policy-based compliance controls

BUILT FOR:

Portnox is designed for distributed organizations that need to manage access across employees, contractors, service accounts, managed devices, unmanaged devices, IoT, network infrastructure, SaaS applications, private applications, and AI agents. The platform helps reduce reliance on on-premises appliances, legacy VPNs, and fragmented access tools by centralizing access policy enforcement from a single cloud-native policy engine.

INTEGRATIONS:

Portnox integrates with the tools you already use (including Azure AD / Entra ID, Okta) and works with your existing network appliances, (such as Meraki, Fortinet, and more), and many other identity and network infrastructure tools.

Portnox Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sallie Mae, Roku, Vuori, Legal Zoom, Anaplan, Aecon, H.I.G. Capital, McLaren Construction Group, PFCU, UK Mortgage Lending Limited, CCC Intelligent Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Tailscale, Check Point Software Technologies and others in ZTNA. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.