

Portnox and Fortinet FortiNAC are strong contenders in the network access control domain. Portnox takes the lead with its simple deployment and cost-effectiveness, while FortiNAC stands out with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Fortinet's ecosystem, but is considered harder to navigate.
Features: Portnox emphasizes an agentless, scalable solution that provides comprehensive network visibility and security. It integrates well with Azure AD, Okta, and Google Workspace, offering passwordless authentication for enhanced security. FortiNAC excels in security capabilities and integrates deeply with the Fortinet family, managing diverse switches and offering robust automation and control features.
Room for Improvement: Portnox could improve in areas like response time and better integration for unmanaged devices and across vendor platforms. FortiNAC's interface poses a challenge due to its complexity; users would benefit from improvements in interface intuitiveness and integration with non-Fortinet products. Additionally, FortiNAC could enhance its support for wireless access point management and improve its overall user-friendliness.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox is lauded for its user-friendly and straightforward deployment in cloud and hybrid environments, supported by excellent customer service. In contrast, FortiNAC requires more technical expertise and is primarily focused on on-premises support; it maintains good customer service but there's room for improvement in response times and technical training.
Pricing and ROI: Portnox offers a cost-effective, flexible pricing model that is customer-centric, emphasizing value through reduced maintenance costs, leading to higher ROI. Although FortiNAC is competitively priced, particularly against Cisco ISE, it carries a premium tag despite its robust features and integration within Fortinet’s suite, offering good value to those seeking thorough network control.
We have saved resources and time, and we have also secured our network, confirming we have a return on investment.
If I compare this to an on-premises environment using Cisco ISE or Aruba ClearPass, it would require phenomenally large teams for infrastructure management.
If you were moving from a traditional on-premise NAC that was 100% managed by the IT department, there would be great savings in going to a cloud-based NAC with Portnox.
By automating the device containment and remediation processes, we save countless hours weekly.
They provide sessions to help with various questions.
They could do more to improve, not because of the product itself but because of the support they provide.
Fortinet FortiNAC's customer support is very good, as is typical from Fortinet.
The main area needing improvement is the technical knowledge of support staff.
For very high severity issues where the entire office is non-functional, response time is within 30 minutes.
In terms of support, it is usually quite impressive. I usually get support in a matter of minutes or seconds, depending on the priority of the ticket.
The pricing model makes it challenging as the cost is substantial due to the per-node licensing model.
We have never had any challenge based on a customer who has 1,000 devices versus a customer who has 30,000 devices; the feel is the same.
Its infrastructure scales automatically in the background, eliminating concerns about capacity or backend upgrades.
It has a centralized cloud-based architecture, so we do not have to worry about other considerations such as local infrastructure or purchasing additional equipment.
The product itself is available and its uptime is 100%.
In the four years that I used Portnox, if it crashed or the server crashed, that would not have been more than once.
If there is a version one and another version, the communication between the organization using it and Portnox should be firm so they can coordinate effectively.
Improvement in the interface design would make FortiNAC a better solution.
The graphical user interface (GUI) of Fortinet FortiNAC is very poor compared to competitors like Forcepoint and Cisco ISE.
Fortinet FortiNAC can be improved as the GUI is very poor compared to other competitors such as Cisco ISE.
Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.
When I reach the technical support, they give solutions that do not help me much, so I try to search the internet for other users' experiences to find solutions.
When I'm doing filtering at times, it doesn't filter the items properly.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Fortinet FortiNAC is that, as is typical from Fortinet, all their products have a very good licensing model and competitive pricing.
Fortinet FortiNAC is relatively cheap compared to other solutions.
If you compare Portnox with all other well-known standard products, it is the cheapest.
The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe.
You are charged according to the number of users.
I appreciate the feature where it can connect with different vendor equipment, regardless of the network devices from other vendors.
The best features Fortinet FortiNAC offers include great integration with other Fortinet products.
The main advantage of Fortinet FortiNAC is its integration with the entire Fortinet product portfolio.
It's notable how Portnox has improved operational efficiency.
It is a very robust application because three teams use that part: the network team, the security team, and the support people.
It is possible to find the MAC address in the switch, but in Portnox, it is very useful to see the status of those ports, and that increases our security.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiNAC | 13.2% |
| Portnox | 7.2% |
| Other | 79.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Fortinet FortiNAC is integral for enhancing network access control by providing security, visibility, and control over IoT devices. Known for its user-friendly interface and powerful automation, it streamlines network management and access control while supporting policy enforcement and guest management.
Fortinet FortiNAC offers robust security by integrating seamlessly with Fortinet products, enhancing compatibility with external vendors, and allowing users to manage wired and wireless networks efficiently. Known for its ability to prevent unauthorized connections, it enhances network visibility and control, particularly in managing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and compliance. However, integration with non-Fortinet systems, better reporting capabilities, and intuitive interface improvements are areas for enhancement. Setup complexities, additional equipment needs for features like single sign-on, and improved support and documentation are noted challenges.
What are the key features of Fortinet FortiNAC?In education and healthcare, Fortinet FortiNAC is applied extensively to manage Wi-Fi access for non-domain devices, ensuring secure network access without traditional password-based systems. It integrates with Fortinet Security Fabric, offering endpoint profiling and posture assessments to ensure adherence to security standards. This implementation enhances BYOD management, allowing organizations to meet compliance and security requirements effectively across diverse environments.
Portnox NAC is a cloud-native network access control solution built for today's hybrid, distributed enterprises. Get real-time visibility into every device on your network, enforce risk-based access policies automatically, and maintain continuous compliance — all without deploying a single on-premises appliance.
----------
About Portnox Security
Portnox is a cloud-native enterprise access control provider that helps organizations secure every identity - human and non-human - across networks, applications, and infrastructure. As identities, devices, and workloads multiply across modern environments, Portnox enables continuous access verification based on identity context, device posture, and risk signals. Its unified platform brings together passwordless authentication, access control, continuous policy enforcement, and automated response through a single policy engine.
Portnox gives security and IT teams real-time visibility into everything connecting and the ability to quickly restrict, quarantine, or revoke non-compliant access. Today, Portnox actively manages more than one million devices worldwide, secures 40 million authentication sessions, and blocks over one million unauthorized access attempts every day. Learn more at portnox.com.
CAPABILITIES:
• Discover and assess users, devices, and identities connecting to corporate resources
• Unify continuous zero trust access control on networks, applications, and infrastructure
• Enforce identity- and context-aware access policies
• Enable secure remote work without complexity
• Deliver passwordless authentication, device posture checks, and continuous access enforcement
• Control administrative access to routers, switches, firewalls, and other network devices
• Improve audit readiness with visibility, access logs, and policy-based compliance controls
BUILT FOR:
Portnox is designed for distributed organizations that need to manage access across employees, contractors, service accounts, managed devices, unmanaged devices, IoT, network infrastructure, SaaS applications, private applications, and AI agents. The platform helps reduce reliance on on-premises appliances, legacy VPNs, and fragmented access tools by centralizing access policy enforcement from a single cloud-native policy engine.
INTEGRATIONS:
Portnox integrates with the tools you already use (including Azure AD / Entra ID, Okta) and works with your existing network appliances, (such as Meraki, Fortinet, and more), and many other identity and network infrastructure tools.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.