Fortify Software Security Center vs Harness comparison

OpenText and Harness are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3, while Harness is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText holds a 0.4% mindshare in SAST, compared to Harness’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Harness users who would recommend it.

Fortify Software Security C...

Read 6 Fortify Software Security Center reviews

437 Views
319 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Harness

Read 3 Harness reviews

215 Views
152 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortify Software Security C...

Harness

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Software Security Center and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Software Security Center vs. Harness Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. Harness

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Software Security C...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Harness

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (10th), Cloud Cost Management (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harness is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Steyn

Principal Technical Consultant at EOH

Comprehensive vulnerability analysis and customization features with decent pricing

Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances. WebInspect supports a number of APIs and web endpoints. I find its feature of macro recording allows for testing vulnerabilities during multi-factor authentication sessions very valuable. I appreciate the ability to further analyze data with tools like Audit Workbench.

Read full review

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Streamline microservices deployment with integrated execution pipelines and comprehensive monitoring

Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place. It is very convenient since we have many microservices, so having one platform for all of them is beneficial. The dashboard allows me to monitor all core services' deployment status in one place, making it easier to find bugs and check logs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."

"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."

"Fortify Analytics' AI function helps scan and provides more detailed explanations and recommendations about vulnerabilities."

"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."

"Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances."

"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."

"The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."

"Harness starts integrating with organizations, making everything automated without the need for manual interruption."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place, making it convenient."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place."

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

Cons

"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."

"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."

"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."

"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."

"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."

"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."

"I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."

"Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals."

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

"When integrating Harness with more than twenty applications in one place, it becomes less stable, causing improvements to be necessary."

"I prefer the previous less compact UI version of Harness, which showed more details on the screen."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."

"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."

"The solution is priced fair."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Software Security Center?

You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

In the beginning, it was difficult for me to verify that our usage of Fortify Software Security Center corresponded to the license and criteria. Now, we have negotiated a number of details to respe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?

I would like the false positive issue to diminish. I have experienced a lot of false positives, but I think this is due to using an older version. I hope the new version will resolve my problem.

See all answers

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harness?

Previously, when deploying a version that had been deployed successfully before, it sometimes failed upon trying again, which seems to be an intermittent issue about stability. I prefer the previou...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Harness?

I used Harness for CICD, and it served as the release platform that our team used for Java applications. We do Java microservices, and we used it to deploy them.

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortify on Demand vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 61% of the time

Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 39% of the time

More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors

Jenkins vs Harness

Compared 19% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Compared 17% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 14% of the time

Tekton vs Harness

Compared 13% of the time

GitLab vs Harness

Compared 8% of the time

More Harness Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

April 2025

Download Fortify Software Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

April 2025

Download Harness product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect

Armory

Overview

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.

OpenText

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Harness

Sample Customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. Harness

April 2025

Free Report: Fortify Software Security Center vs. Harness

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center vs. Harness and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. Harness report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.