Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Twingate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.0
Fortinet FortiNAC's support is responsive with effective community forums, but faces issues with expertise, documentation, and communication.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.7
Fortinet FortiNAC faces challenges in user-friendliness, integration, learning curve, support, compatibility, pricing, and configuration complexity.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Fortinet FortiNAC is highly scalable, adaptable for various environments, and praised for flexible licensing and system integration.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Fortinet FortiNAC pricing is high but competitive, offering feature-rich value, with reasonable maintenance for prioritized visibility and control.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Fortinet FortiNAC is generally stable, with occasional issues during updates and HA setups, improving in recent versions.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
Fortinet FortiNAC delivers IoT visibility, compliance checks, automation, security, user-friendly interfaces, and integration, enhancing device management flexibility.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiNAC
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Twingate
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Internet Security (8th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (16th), ZTNA as a Service (15th), ZTNA (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiNAC is 17.7%, up from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Twingate is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC)
 

Featured Reviews

Batu Akalin - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor
I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices. FortiNAC has improved our security posture because we made some use-case scenarios for unauthorized devices. When unauthorized device IDs enter our network, and the associated team sees a new device, they can block the attackers.
Joey Benamy - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps reduce access-related support tickets, is quick to deploy, and streamlines onboarding
We were able to add Twingate into our infrastructure without having to change our infrastructure or how people work. We reaped the benefits of Twingate immediately because it replaced an alternative solution with a lot of overhead. Twingate helped reduce access-related support tickets by 80 percent. Twingate streamlines onboarding for our company, especially for the engineering team, by automating resource access through directory integrations. New employees generally require no manual configuration within Twingate, saving us significant time and effort. The resiliency is directly proportional to the level of control we exert over its components. We can manage Twingate connectors to support high availability, ensuring the system is as reliable as needed. This flexibility and control enhance Twingate's resiliency capabilities significantly.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
34%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Media Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is the biggest difference between Aruba ClearPass and FortiNAC?
I've done quite a lot of work with ClearPass, and not a lot with FortiNAC/Bradford. ClearPass incorporates a number of different functions including ClearPass Guest for creating complex wireless g...
How does Cisco ISE compare with Fortinet FortiNAC?
Cisco ISE uses AI endpoint analytics to identify new devices based on their behavior. It will also notify you if someone plugs in with a device that is not allowed and will block it. The user exper...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiNAC?
The support responds to our queries within two to four hours.
What needs improvement with Twingate?
Twingate's lack of native support for Windows Server is a significant limitation. While it hasn't directly affected my company, I've encountered this issue when assisting others. Additionally, the ...
 

Also Known As

FortiNAC, Bradford Networks, Bradford Networks Sentry, Network Sentry Family
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Isavia, Pepperdine University, Medical University of South Carolina, Columbia University Medical Center, Utah Valley University
Blend, Modern Health, Webflow, Liberis, Cerebral, Homebase, Bloomreach, Cameo, Hippo and Bitpanda
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.