FreeNAS vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ comparison

FreeNAS and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the NAS category. FreeNAS is ranked #14, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. FreeNAS holds a 3.4% mindshare in N, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FreeNAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

FreeNAS

Read 9 FreeNAS reviews

1,150 Views
1,150 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

10,225 Views
2,454 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

FreeNAS

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and FreeNAS compete in the storage solutions category. HPE 3PAR StoreServ holds the upper hand due to its enterprise-grade features and strong customer support, though FreeNAS is more cost-effective, attracting smaller operations.

Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers all-flash arrays, remote copy functionality, and ease of use with deduplication and compression. FreeNAS excels in dynamic disk management and supports integrated services like SMB and S3, though it lacks some advanced enterprise features.

Room for Improvement: HPE 3PAR StoreServ could improve its cloud integration and automation, focusing on better InfoSight functionality and documentation clarity. FreeNAS could enhance clustering capabilities and provide better documentation, especially for technical issues and backup operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE 3PAR StoreServ is deployed on-premises with strong technical support, though response times vary. FreeNAS is deployed on-premises and in private clouds, appreciated for its simplicity and open-source nature but lacks robust professional support.

Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a premium option with higher costs covering licensing and maintenance, offering good ROI through performance and reliability. FreeNAS, being open-source, primarily incurs hardware costs, appealing to those prioritizing cost-efficiency over advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 890,124 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FreeNAS

Ranking in NAS

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in NAS

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of FreeNAS is 3.4%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 3.7%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	3.7%
FreeNAS	3.4%
Other	92.9%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Vincenzo D'Aniello

Software developer at TREXON S.R.L.

Open-source with great disk management and task synchronization

The system itself allows you to add any feature. The only bad thing is that this maybe depends on FreeBSD, and sometimes finding documentation is difficult. For example, we knew that previous versions automatically enabled the Linux kernel, yet with the recent version, this was no longer the case. Now, there was the possibility of being able to create Debian-based jails, and finding the documentation was not easy or fast. That said, in the end, we succeeded. If you find the documentation, it is always incomplete and fragmented.

Read full review

Cyril Omatsola

Information Systems & Security Administrator at a government with 501-1,000 employees

Ease of use in data center boosts resilience and infrastructure efficiency

I find the HPE 3PAR StoreServ valuable for its ease of use and resilience, which is beneficial. The main benefits I have seen from having HPE 3PAR StoreServ include its use at a small branch I managed for about three years with around 60 users. It operates effectively because it is an HPE product we use there. I have not experienced any significant issues besides occasional IT-related ones, such as local database problems. Since handing over the administration of the system to someone else and moving to another department, there have not been any issues. There are many features that exist but I haven't needed to try. Before moving out of that role in my organization, I knew it was a product I enjoyed working with for infrastructure purposes. After completing my new role, I intend to return to infrastructure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FreeNAS is much simpler and easier to use than other solutions, but we don't have the complete range of features that come with the full version."

"After using FreeNAS I will never spend money for commercial products like Dell or 3Par."

"The program is fast, fun to work on and easy."

"The fact that no data are lost when a hard drive fails is extremely reassuring, as I have had two of five drives fail at one time and no data were lost."

"Its stability is the most valuable. It is reliable, and we don't have to worry too much about it."

"What I like about it is that I can work on it from any computer or any device. The initial setup is very simple. The setup wizard is really helpful."

"It has the best storage capacity."

"The ease of use of the 'jail', the management of backups, and copies to easily create test and pre-production scenarios have speeded up the development and distribution of business apps."

More FreeNAS pros

"In the deployment of virtual servers, I can have a new VM up and running in 15 minutes, run the patches, then done. I routinely fire up base images that I have for my servers: Server 2008 R2, 2012 R2, and 2016. I routinely fire those base images up and do all the updates, then prep them again for cloning. With 3PAR, we definitely have the performance to do that. Those images I do keep on SSD just to have that performance to deploy a new VM."

"3PAR is fairly easy to use; we have used a few different arrays in the past, and they were a lot more complicated, but this one was fast to bring up and start using right away, easy to keep running, does not require too much effort, and has been very reliable, which is key."

"We built a DR solution based on this, we can sustain our business for any amount of time, 24/7."

"At the end of the day, 3PAR was the most valuable."

"We deployed 3PAR in the national and international markets. It's not bad, the solution."

"The all-flash positions our organization for growth; if somebody comes to us who needs an application with performance, we have that already formulated."

"All-flash has been the most innovative way of using storage based on the 3PAR platform."

"We're using Peer-to-Peer for two data centers and having that fill over instantaneous is what we really needed for disaster recovery."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

Cons

"Its support for Hyper-V clusters."

"The support for S3 needs to be improved."

"Make it easier to find out how to fix things when something goes wrong."

"The latest version of the dashboard doesn't work as good as the previous version. Sometimes we change our dashboard back to the previous version because the latest version just doesn't work as good."

"FreeNAS should be better prepared for clustering."

"They can improve the integration with PSA systems. This functionality could be better."

"If you find the documentation, it is always incomplete and fragmented."

"They should include clustering for the solution."

More FreeNAS cons

"There is a need for just cleaning up the administration page a little more and making it a little faster."

"An area of improvement for this solution is an increase in the bandwidth as well as an upgrade of the storage functionality and capabilities."

"We'd like to remove some of the barriers to integration with Microsoft."

"I thought I was going to like storage v-motion, but I’m running into problems where Peer Motion doesn’t do what it was advertised to do."

"HPE 3PAR StoreServ might be missing certain features available in newer products."

"The performance of the solution is not good anymore and the software is different from all the other types and is not compatible. There are more negative things at this moment than positive. This is why we are removing them all from our organization this year."

"We have seen one area, where we have highly virtualized Solaris instances, where we're getting into the queue depth, so we probably need to do some work in the queue-depth area in the arrays."

"The initial setup was complex, due to calculating the amount of performance that we needed for the floor."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For our configuration, we pay a little bit less than €10,000 ($12,000 USD) per year."

"Its price is okay. It suits our needs."

"Its licensing cost is based on the hardware capacity."

"We use the free version of the program."

"Budget wise, 3PAR is a lot of money compared to other solutions, but what is in the 3PAR integration that customers are getting now from the Nimble and InfoSight acquisitions, it is worthwhile."

"This product is quite expensive and in addition, we subscribe to 24/7 support with a four-hour response time."

"The total cost of ownership really is worth every penny."

"There was a one-time cost when we procured this product and there are no monthly or yearly licensing fees."

"The price of the solution could be reduced for the license and for support."

"I would like it to be cheaper."

"If HPE reduced the price of 3PAR StoreServ they would be more attractive to mid-range companies."

"For the price that we were able to acquire it, we have seen it give us the performance and stability that we require to run our enterprise."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

The compression features are good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp FAS Series vs FreeNAS

Compared 11% of the time

QNAP NAS Storage vs FreeNAS

Compared 9% of the time

StarWind Storage Appliance vs FreeNAS

Compared 8% of the time

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs FreeNAS

Compared 8% of the time

LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways vs FreeNAS

Compared 5% of the time

More FreeNAS Competitors

HPE Primera vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

HPE MSA vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FreeNAS

April 2026

Download FreeNAS product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

April 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Also Known As

No data available

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

Overview

FreeNAS, an open-source storage platform, offers easy setup with intuitive management for network-attached storage. It's known for stability and compatibility across Windows and Linux. FreeNAS integrates with CIFS, NFS, and iSCSI while maintaining efficient virtual machine support.

FreeNAS stands out in the realm of network-attached storage by providing robust performance with dynamic disk management and task synchronization. Its container integration enhances versatility, coupled with comprehensive storage options like CIFS, NFS, and iSCSI. Users find value in its capabilities to manage virtual machines and integrated services such as SMB and S3. A vital feature includes data protection during drive failures, maintaining compatibility with both Windows and Linux environments. However, users encounter challenges with backing up large files due to slow network speeds, fragmented documentation, and integration with PSA systems or Hyper-V clusters. Scalability and clearer guidance are areas for improvement. Despite these, FreeNAS is widely utilized for its simplicity in creating users, managing permissions, and offering privacy-focused storage, especially beneficial for organizations with significant data handling needs.

What are some of the key features of FreeNAS?

Easy Setup: Streamlined installation process with minimal technical barriers.
Stability: Reliable performance in managing storage needs.
Dynamic Disk Management: Flexible handling of storage configurations.
Task Synchronization: Efficient task management for optimized operations.
Container Integration: Supports diverse applications effortlessly.
Comprehensive Storage Options: Integrates CIFS, NFS, and iSCSI for varied storage needs.
Virtual Machine Support: Efficient management of virtual environments.
Data Protection: Ensures security during drive failures.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interfaces for managing large-scale storage.
Compatibility: Seamless integration with Windows and Linux systems.
Scalability: Potential to expand storage capabilities as needs grow.
Cost Efficiency: Open-source nature reduces license expenses.
Security: Protects sensitive data in research and corporate settings.

FreeNAS is implemented across diverse industries for network-attached storage, primarily serving as a backup for massive files like video files and research data. Organizations employ it for transferring and storing large datasets, and some utilize its 'jail' services for hosting applications such as JavaEE, nodejs, and GitLab. Researchers appreciate the privacy-focused storage and interim backups offered by FreeNAS, suiting their needs for both large-scale data handling and practical application hosting.

FreeNAS

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Morroni Technologies Inc., Creative Integrations

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

Buyer's Guide

FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ

April 2026

Free Report: FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Find out what your peers are saying about FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

890,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.