Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs IBM BPM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Genpact Cora SeQuence
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
38th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM BPM
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
109
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (8th), Process Automation (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Genpact Cora SeQuence is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM BPM is 7.7%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

HJ
Nov 22, 2018
It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime.
It's a one-way process which results in less back and forth work I find the flexibility most valuable. In addition, being able to connect and integrate with various systems, as well as being solution oriented is valuable to me, as well. The areas that would benefit in improvement would be the…
Mohammed Almalki - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 8, 2024
Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve
We mainly use it for human-centric operational processes (less than 20) The case management and its integration with process design are the only pros comparable to Komunda. There is room for improvement in terms of integrations. It is one of the biggest drawbacks. My organization has been using…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"Technical support is pleasant to work with and always available."
"The most valuable features come in the bundle, the design process, creating services, creating BPDs, creating coaches, and UI/UX."
"IBM BPM should become cloud-native. It should also add a cloud deployment feature."
"Its most valuable features are usability and integration with other IBM products."
"The most valuable feature for the organization is the Document Store."
"We like that it does not require a lot of hours to train our people."
"With the Process Center, I can go to one place and view what all the environments are doing."
"The possibility to add Java code as embedded .jar, that increases the flexibility of the solution."
 

Cons

"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"I suggest establishing a developer forum for better communication and issue resolution. Also, the administration panel could be improved for task management."
"We care about technology and support because support is very important and a BPM is not easy to implement."
"We have been experiencing bad performance and instability."
"Importing and exporting between multiple environments is more difficult with other tools."
"I would like IBM to consider including AI-enabled process mining, robotic process automation, and very good OCR capabilities from the computer vision side."
"It can definitely be improved in terms of performance and stability."
"The setup was quite complex because the solution was cutting-edge at that time and IBM invested considerably in the implementation, likely at a loss to themselves."
"I hope IBM uses something from IBM Content Navigator to make the interface easier to navigate."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is quite high, I would rate it two out of five."
"It may be cheaper for organizations to pay for the Viewer licenses that are immediately up and running in the cloud, rather than paying for someone to administer publishing to an intranet."
"The price of the solution is fair for an enterprise solution that has both cloud and on-premise deployments and when comparing to competitors. Recently IBM has introduced Cloud Pak which allows for more flexible licensing options for automation and other features."
"The price is good but could be a little lower."
"IBM BPM is expensive, so most large companies opt for IBM based on their licensing options."
"The pricing is very high."
"I rate the solution's pricing a four out of ten."
"The solution is highly-priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Insurance Company
6%
Media Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which is better, IBM BPM or IBM Business Automation Workflow?
We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow. IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing en...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite
WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process Server
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade
Barclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito Santo
Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. IBM BPM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.