Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Genpact and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Genpact is ranked #40, while SAP is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6. Genpact holds a 0.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Genpact users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.
Genpact Cora SeQuence
Read 2 Genpact Cora SeQuence reviews
  • 377 Views
  • 221 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SAP Signavio Process Manager
Read 59 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews
  • 6,919 Views
  • 4,519 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Genpact Cora SeQuence and SAP Signavio Process Manager are competing in process management and optimization. SAP Signavio Process Manager appears to have an advantage due to greater functionality and integration capabilities, despite higher costs, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence scores higher in pricing and customer service satisfaction.

Features: Genpact Cora SeQuence offers flexible process modeling, analytics-driven insights, and agile workflow facilitation. SAP Signavio Process Manager provides comprehensive process modeling, collaborative design capabilities, and seamless integration with other SAP tools, supporting complex process mapping.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Signavio Process Manager is efficient in cloud deployment with extensive support, thorough documentation, and a responsive service team. Genpact Cora SeQuence allows straightforward deployment and garners high ratings for direct and accessible customer service, although SAP's setup might require more configuration, their knowledgeable support assists during onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Genpact Cora SeQuence is recognized for cost-effectiveness, yielding good ROI with lower setup costs and shorter implementation times. SAP Signavio Process Manager has a higher upfront cost but offers significant ROI due to superior features and extensive process improvement potential.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Genpact Cora SeQuence
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
40th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Signavio Process Manager
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Genpact Cora SeQuence is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.7%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

HJ
It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime.
I suggest that before you purchase a solution, you understand their business well, and before selecting a supplier to understand what they are targeting. Too many companies go into this with complex procedures and processes,not understanding it and trying to model it as it goes. So, in the end, they end up with a solution that it is not what they aimed for in the beginning.
Read full review
Cirvesh-Daga - PeerSpot reviewer
Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities
There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it."
"It is possible to do the whole drafting process at the same time in Sagnavio so you don't have a double effort of writing it once, arranging it and entering it again."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"The features I find most valuable are ease of use and the Collaboration Hub."
"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."
"The Collaboration Hub is especially useful for collaborative tasks and ensuring transparency across teams."
"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."
"As a business transformation suite, Signavio offers a number of integrated helpful tools. The Process Modeler helps with the conceptual work, but is directly integrated with the components of the Workflow Accelerator (Automation) and the Process Intelligence (Mining). This makes Signavio an indispensable service package."
More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros
 

Cons

"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"For me, given I've got a lot of experience working with BPMN and other process management tools, in terms of the interface, I think there's a little bit more that can be improved to match what the conventional BPMN offers. I've been constantly trying to give this feedback to Signavio, to let them know that it needs to be more coherent with the original BPMN version of the stencil."
"I would like to have the option to select the color of items and subgroups in the glossary because right now it is fixed."
"There is room for improvement in the reporting function. At the moment, for example, while it is possible to report on how many users you had in the last month, you can't use it to tell you how many users you had from the first week to the second week. This is really a drawback because when you have an activity to promote Signavio or BPI, it would be good to be able to measure how many people you had in the system."
"Two executives cannot work on one modeling process simultaneously."
"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."
"I find it difficult to figure out how I can better align this solution with my KPIs."
"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."
"There is a lot of room for improvement. We've submitted a lot of OSS requests for special inputs we need, like glossary or dictionary entries in Quick Model. Currently, that's not functional."
More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."
"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."
"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."
"This solution provides really great value for the money."
"I found the pricing of the solution to be moderate compared to other choices."
"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."
"SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."
More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?
SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...
See all answers
What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?
The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?
Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Appian vs Genpact Cora SeQuence Logo
Appian vs Genpact Cora SeQuence
Compared 100% of the time
More Genpact Cora SeQuence Competitors
Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager Logo
Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager
Compared 30% of the time
ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager Logo
ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager
Compared 12% of the time
Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager Logo
Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager
Compared 8% of the time
ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager Logo
ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager
Compared 5% of the time
Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager Logo
Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager
Compared 5% of the time
More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2025
Genpact Cora SeQuence reportDownload Genpact Cora SeQuence product report
Buyer's Guide
SAP Signavio Process Manager
March 2025
SAP Signavio Process Manager reportDownload SAP Signavio Process Manager product report
 

Also Known As

Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite
Signavio Process Editor
 

Overview

Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle. The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.
Genpact

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP
 

Sample Customers

South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade
DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten
Buyer's Guide
Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager
March 2025
Free Report: Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.