Genpact Cora SeQuence vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Genpact and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Genpact is ranked #38, while SAP is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6. Genpact holds a 0.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Genpact users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Read 2 Genpact Cora SeQuence reviews

413 Views
245 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 59 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

7,347 Views
4,858 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Genpact Cora SeQuence

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Genpact Cora SeQuence and SAP Signavio Process Manager are competing in process management and optimization. SAP Signavio Process Manager appears to have an advantage due to greater functionality and integration capabilities, despite higher costs, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence scores higher in pricing and customer service satisfaction.

Features: Genpact Cora SeQuence offers flexible process modeling, analytics-driven insights, and agile workflow facilitation. SAP Signavio Process Manager provides comprehensive process modeling, collaborative design capabilities, and seamless integration with other SAP tools, supporting complex process mapping.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Signavio Process Manager is efficient in cloud deployment with extensive support, thorough documentation, and a responsive service team. Genpact Cora SeQuence allows straightforward deployment and garners high ratings for direct and accessible customer service, although SAP's setup might require more configuration, their knowledgeable support assists during onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Genpact Cora SeQuence is recognized for cost-effectiveness, yielding good ROI with lower setup costs and shorter implementation times. SAP Signavio Process Manager has a higher upfront cost but offers significant ROI due to superior features and extensive process improvement potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

38th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Genpact Cora SeQuence is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.5%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Helgi Jonsson

Prosthetics Quality Center Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime.

I suggest that before you purchase a solution, you understand their business well, and before selecting a supplier to understand what they are targeting. Too many companies go into this with complex procedures and processes,not understanding it and trying to model it as it goes. So, in the end, they end up with a solution that it is not what they aimed for in the beginning.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."

"It is very stable. There is no downtime."

"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."

"As a business transformation suite, Signavio offers a number of integrated helpful tools. The Process Modeler helps with the conceptual work, but is directly integrated with the components of the Workflow Accelerator (Automation) and the Process Intelligence (Mining). This makes Signavio an indispensable service package."

"The fact that the repository is available on the web is the most valuable feature. It's a very simple tool. If you can use something simple and visual, you should be able to use the model as well in Signavio. It has the ability, for example, to track versioning control, so if you make updates to the processes, you have the ability to track the versions as well."

"The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand because it's visually presented. It becomes easy to explain variants and what needs to change."

"I really like the Collaboration Hub because it's so easy to communicate. And what is really important is that you can use it asynchronously. It doesn't matter if you're working in Italy or in America. You are using the same process and you can speak about the same process."

"The interface is very intuitive and includes a drag-and-drop function."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"There are many valuable features, of course. I would say the main value of Signavio is to have your current process map in a way that is easy to read and derive optimization actions to make it leaner, faster, more user friendly, etc. Another great feature is the visualization, which is easy to see and read. How they map the process is also very user friendly, with drag-and-drop functionality. Also, it's a very self-explanatory, user-friendly solution."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."

"The setup and configuration is complex."

"The price can be made cheaper."

"Typically, a business process management suite would cover the whole lifecycle, from discovery to optimization and operations. This is running on the process server and providing some kind of low-code environment for developing business solutions. I think the latter part is missing, where SAP Connector comes in. Specifically, the execution of processes is missing, where you would design forms to take orders. This is typically part of some development environment for the process server to run processes from out of the models."

"Technical support has been somewhat challenging; there hasn't been much visibility on how to create a ticket or integrate with SAP."

"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."

"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."

"I would like to be able to link a single word within a textual description directly to the glossary."

"The user management functionality in Process Manager is not as user friendly as the one in the Collaboration Hub."

"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."

"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."

"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."

"SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.

See all answers

Comparisons

Appian vs Genpact Cora SeQuence

Compared 100% of the time

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 24% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

December 2024

Download Genpact Cora SeQuence product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

December 2024

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite

Signavio Process Editor

Learn More

Genpact

Video not available

SAP

Overview

Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle.Â The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

Sample Customers

South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2025

Free Report: Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.