Genpact Cora SeQuence vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Genpact and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Genpact is ranked #40, while SAP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.6. Genpact holds a 0.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Genpact users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Read 2 Genpact Cora SeQuence reviews

381 Views
228 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 59 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

7,093 Views
4,658 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Genpact Cora SeQuence

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Genpact Cora SeQuence and SAP Signavio Process Manager are competing in process management and optimization. SAP Signavio Process Manager appears to have an advantage due to greater functionality and integration capabilities, despite higher costs, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence scores higher in pricing and customer service satisfaction.

Features: Genpact Cora SeQuence offers flexible process modeling, analytics-driven insights, and agile workflow facilitation. SAP Signavio Process Manager provides comprehensive process modeling, collaborative design capabilities, and seamless integration with other SAP tools, supporting complex process mapping.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Signavio Process Manager is efficient in cloud deployment with extensive support, thorough documentation, and a responsive service team. Genpact Cora SeQuence allows straightforward deployment and garners high ratings for direct and accessible customer service, although SAP's setup might require more configuration, their knowledgeable support assists during onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Genpact Cora SeQuence is recognized for cost-effectiveness, yielding good ROI with lower setup costs and shorter implementation times. SAP Signavio Process Manager has a higher upfront cost but offers significant ROI due to superior features and extensive process improvement potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,672 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

40th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Genpact Cora SeQuence is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.6%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Helgi Jonsson

Prosthetics Quality Center Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime.

I suggest that before you purchase a solution, you understand their business well, and before selecting a supplier to understand what they are targeting. Too many companies go into this with complex procedures and processes,not understanding it and trying to model it as it goes. So, in the end, they end up with a solution that it is not what they aimed for in the beginning.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very stable. There is no downtime."

"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."

"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."

"The most valuable feature for me is the collaboration point of view, where everybody has a single view, or source of truth, and everybody sees the same thing. Everyone can comment, contribute, and discuss the processes itself, which makes it easier to funnel down the most value adding comments and make the relevant changes to the processes. This leads to the next best iteration or version of your process."

"There are many valuable features, of course. I would say the main value of Signavio is to have your current process map in a way that is easy to read and derive optimization actions to make it leaner, faster, more user friendly, etc. Another great feature is the visualization, which is easy to see and read. How they map the process is also very user friendly, with drag-and-drop functionality. Also, it's a very self-explanatory, user-friendly solution."

"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."

"The product's most valuable feature is the transformation process."

"All in all, Signavio usability is excellent. Anyone can learn to use the tool quickly. This increases acceptance as employees are not facing a high learning curve. With the offered usability it is easy to model processes also live in workshops."

"It is highly user-friendly and easy to use, even for those who are not familiar with product modeling."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."

"The setup and configuration is complex."

"The collaboration and commenting are great. However, I think it would be more useful for people to get notifications of comments straight-away so we can react even quicker to them than we already can."

"I would like to be able to include images in the documentation."

"There is always room for improvement is the capability of integration with other solutions."

"There is a need for more varied access packages. The access packages that I have used are not cheap enough. They also provide a complete set of tools that are not always used. Sometimes, you need more segregated things, e.g., Signavio includes functionality for a company that has not yet matured. Since there are no basic packages, the company must pay for a package that is not fully used. Typically, process management is started in a company of a certain maturity."

"The solution is complex."

"I think the intuitive handling is an issue which they should be more focused on, especially as we have issues with the glossary. If you want to implement Signavio within procedures in contact with other software, it's quite difficult to integrate and you will have several points where you have to double and triple the work, because you cannot maintain the data centrally. With other solutions, we can integrate it and have only one data transfer, to import and export with other solutions. A glossary is still limiting us."

"Typically, a business process management suite would cover the whole lifecycle, from discovery to optimization and operations. This is running on the process server and providing some kind of low-code environment for developing business solutions. I think the latter part is missing, where SAP Connector comes in. Specifically, the execution of processes is missing, where you would design forms to take orders. This is typically part of some development environment for the process server to run processes from out of the models."

"One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"We are using the free trial version."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"I found the pricing of the solution to be moderate compared to other choices."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.

See all answers

Comparisons

Appian vs Genpact Cora SeQuence

Compared 100% of the time

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 29% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

March 2025

Download Genpact Cora SeQuence product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

March 2025

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle.Â The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.

Genpact

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

March 2025

Free Report: Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.