Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard's customer service is generally quick and helpful, though some users in certain regions face challenges.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Patch's customer service is generally helpful during implementation but can be slow, involving lengthy escalation and testing processes.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard requires enhancements in LAN expansion, Linux docs, cloud support, custom software, asset tracking, and additional features.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Patch lacks Ubuntu support, limits CentOS, challenges macOS updates, suggests cloud-based approach, and needs a user-friendly interface.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard is scalable and adaptable, supporting various workloads and platforms, suitable for small to large organizations.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is scalable, efficiently handles large deployments, supports organizational growth, and manages numerous endpoints easily.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard offers competitive patch management pricing, with costs around $1,000 to $2,500 annually and discounts for Gold partners.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager provides scalable, cost-effective pricing, starting from $ per device, suitable for large enterprises.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard is highly stable, with improved functionality and minimal issues, even during server updates, rated eight out of ten.
No sentiment score available
Users praise Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager's stability, rating it 8-10, with minor occasional slowness reported by one user.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard excels in vulnerability assessment, patch management, ease of use, integration, resource efficiency, asset tracking, and endpoint control.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is valued for its comprehensive management, automated deployment, integration, and support for multiple applications and systems.
 

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard
Ranking in Patch Management
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...
Ranking in Patch Management
20th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 3.9%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ted Mbugua - PeerSpot reviewer
Scalable, light on resources, and useful visibility
The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others.
PraveenRajan - PeerSpot reviewer
Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects
We face some challenges, particularly with non-domain-joined macOS devices. Patching, updating, and syncing with the server can be tricky for them. So, the major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server. If Ivanti Patch had a cloud-based option instead of requiring an on-premises server and software. Hosting it in the cloud would simplify management, eliminating dependence on VPNs or other connectivity issues. Similar to Microsoft's EMS licensing, offering a cloud-based solution like Azure Active Directory or Endpoint Management Suite (EMS) would be ideal. EMS allows us to manage policies, batching, and software distribution entirely through the cloud, minimizing server downloads. If Ivanti considered a cloud-based approach, it would be hugely beneficial in today's hybrid work environment, where employees use desktops, laptops, and various locations. It's not just about patching office PCs anymore; mobile workers and backups need seamless access as well. Cloud-based patching would be much easier in a hybrid environment. Imagine updates coming directly from the cloud instead of relying on individual VPN connections. It would streamline the entire process.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GFI LanGuard?
The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.
What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?
The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing...
What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?
It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well.
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?
We use the solution to patch Windows and Linux machines. We download the patches and implement them. We get vulnerability reports after patching.
 

Also Known As

LanGuard
Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, Patch for Endpoints, Shavlik Patch for Endpoints
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross
InfoPro Digital, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District
Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.