Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
GFI LanGuard Logo

Top 10 GFI LanGuard Alternatives

Vendor: GFI
4.0 out of 5
Post review

Top GFI LanGuard Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to GFI LanGuard based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Configuration Manager, BigFix, and NinjaOne. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

GFI Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with GFI, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
GFI LanGuard Logo
GFI LanGuard Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager offers centralized deployment and patch management, ideal for large enterprises seeking comprehensive integration. In comparison, GFI LanGuard provides streamlined vulnerability assessments for organizations valuing straightforward, cost-effective security without extensive management. Buyers might choose based on infrastructure needs and budget.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager requires a significant initial setup cost, whereas GFI LanGuard offers a more affordable setup option. These differences highlight the varying cost structures of both solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager requires a significant initial setup cost, whereas GFI LanGuard offers a more affordable setup option. These differences highlight the varying cost structures of both solutions.
GFI LanGuard Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
GFI LanGuard Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in comprehensive endpoint management, automation, and detailed reporting, making it suitable for large enterprises. In comparison, GFI LanGuard offers ease of use and efficient vulnerability scanning, ideal for smaller deployments. BigFix is scalable, while GFI LanGuard provides faster issue resolution.
Download BigFix vs. GFI LanGuard Report
BigFix's setup cost is significantly higher compared to GFI LanGuard, which presents a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix's setup cost is significantly higher compared to GFI LanGuard, which presents a more budget-friendly option.
GFI LanGuard Logo
NinjaOne
4.0 out of 5
GFI LanGuard Logo
NinjaOne
4.0 out of 5
GFI LanGuard excels in comprehensive vulnerability scanning and patch management, offering cost-effective solutions with responsive customer service. In comparison, NinjaOne is appreciated for its robust remote monitoring, flexibility, automation capabilities, and quick deployment. Both offer significant ROI, with GFI LanGuard being budget-friendly and NinjaOne providing advanced features.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne Report
GFI LanGuard users find setup costs high while NinjaOne is praised for its affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard users find setup costs high while NinjaOne is praised for its affordable setup.
GFI LanGuard Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.9 out of 5
GFI LanGuard Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.9 out of 5
Kaseya VSA is favored for its comprehensive automation and scripting. In comparison, GFI LanGuard’s extensive vulnerability scanning and patch management make it compelling. Tech buyers might choose Kaseya VSA for automation or GFI LanGuard for security. Kaseya VSA offers better pricing, while GFI LanGuard justifies its higher cost with superior features.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. Kaseya VSA Report
Kaseya VSA has a higher setup cost compared to GFI LanGuard, making it crucial for budget-conscious users to consider GFI LanGuard for initial investment savings.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya VSA has a higher setup cost compared to GFI LanGuard, making it crucial for budget-conscious users to consider GFI LanGuard for initial investment savings.
GFI LanGuard Logo
GFI LanGuard Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
4.0 out of 5
GFI LanGuard is valued for extensive network security features, vulnerability scanning, and an intuitive dashboard. In comparison, WSUS is preferred for seamless integration with Windows Server and scalability. GFI LanGuard's users also praise the deployment ease, while WSUS is noted for its lower setup cost.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Report
GFI LanGuard has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, making Microsoft Windows Server Update Services a more cost-effective option upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, making Microsoft Windows Server Update Services a more cost-effective option upfront.
GFI LanGuard Logo
GFI LanGuard Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
4.4 out of 5
Quest KACE excels in integration and automation, offering efficient endpoint management, while GFI LanGuard focuses on security with superior vulnerability assessment. In comparison, Quest KACE supports broader deployments, and GFI LanGuard provides a security-centric approach for vulnerability and patch management.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a setup cost that is generally higher, reflecting its robust functionalities, while GFI LanGuard offers a more budget-friendly setup cost with fewer advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a setup cost that is generally higher, reflecting its robust functionalities, while GFI LanGuard offers a more budget-friendly setup cost with fewer advanced features.
GFI LanGuard Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
GFI LanGuard Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
GFI LanGuard focuses on vulnerability scanning and patch management, excelling in its niche feature set. In comparison, Atera provides a comprehensive IT management solution with remote monitoring, automation, and reporting. GFI LanGuard is ideal for specific security needs, while Atera offers broader IT management capabilities.
Download Atera vs. GFI LanGuard Report
GFI LanGuard has a higher setup cost compared to Atera's more affordable initial investment, reflecting a significant difference in pricing models.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard has a higher setup cost compared to Atera's more affordable initial investment, reflecting a significant difference in pricing models.
GFI LanGuard Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
GFI LanGuard Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
GFI LanGuard excels with comprehensive network scanning and extensive patch management. In comparison, Automox's cloud-native architecture and remote endpoint management give it an advantage. GFI LanGuard requires more initial configuration, whereas Automox offers minimal setup. Automox's competitive cloud pricing and comprehensive features appeal to budget-conscious users.
Download Automox vs. GFI LanGuard Report
GFI LanGuard has a low setup cost, making it affordable for small businesses, while Automox has a moderate setup cost but offers advanced automation features.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard has a low setup cost, making it affordable for small businesses, while Automox has a moderate setup cost but offers advanced automation features.
GFI LanGuard Logo
GFI LanGuard Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
4.2 out of 5
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus attracts budget-conscious buyers with strong automation tools and customer support. In comparison, GFI LanGuard appeals to those needing robust network security and extensive vulnerability assessment. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus ensures straightforward deployment, while GFI LanGuard justifies higher costs with advanced features.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Report
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus has an affordable setup cost while GFI LanGuard's setup cost is higher. The price difference highlights ManageEngine's budget-friendly approach compared to GFI LanGuard's premium pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus has an affordable setup cost while GFI LanGuard's setup cost is higher. The price difference highlights ManageEngine's budget-friendly approach compared to GFI LanGuard's premium pricing.
GFI LanGuard Logo
GFI LanGuard Logo
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
4.0 out of 5
GFI LanGuard excels in network scanning and vulnerability assessment, while Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is favored for its automation and Intune integration. GFI LanGuard benefits smaller networks with reasonable pricing. In comparison, Ivanti offers higher ROI despite its cost due to advanced capabilities.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report
GFI LanGuard has a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, whereas Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard has a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, whereas Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced features.
GFI LanGuard Logo
GFI LanGuard Logo
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform
4.8 out of 5
GFI LanGuard offers network scanning, vulnerability assessment, and patch management. In comparison, SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform provides continuous monitoring, software deployment, and endpoint management. GFI LanGuard is priced affordably. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform delivers substantial ROI. GFI LanGuard has straightforward deployment. SanerNow excels in support quality.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Report
GFI LanGuard has a higher setup cost, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform offers a more affordable initial setup. SanerNow provides better value for those with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard has a higher setup cost, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform offers a more affordable initial setup. SanerNow provides better value for those with budget constraints.
GFI LanGuard Logo
GFI LanGuard Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager
3.8 out of 5

GFI LanGuard is selected for its cost-effective vulnerability scanning and patch management. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers comprehensive patching, ease of integration, and scalability. Despite GFI LanGuard's reasonable pricing, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager provides advanced functionalities and higher ROI.

Download GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Report
GFI LanGuard's setup cost is considered affordable, while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager's setup cost is perceived as higher.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard's setup cost is considered affordable, while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager's setup cost is perceived as higher.
GFI LanGuard Logo
GFI LanGuard Logo
SolarWinds Patch Manager
1 out of 5

SolarWinds Patch Manager makes it easy to perform 3rd-party patch management across tens of thousands of servers and workstations, and enables you to leverage and extend the capabilities of Microsoft WSUS or SCCM to report, deploy, and manage 3rd-party patches as well as Microsoft patches.

View comparison

Related categories

Patch Management
Server Monitoring
Configuration Management