GFI LanGuard vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus comparison

GFI and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Patch Management category. GFI is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. GFI holds a 3.0% mindshare in PM, compared to ManageEngine’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

GFI LanGuard

Read 10 GFI LanGuard reviews

1,333 Views
623 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...

Read 15 ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus reviews

1,859 Views
1,549 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and GFI LanGuard are two prominent patch management tools. Based on user reviews, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus holds an advantage in support and satisfaction, whereas GFI LanGuard is often preferred for its superior feature set, with users finding its cost justified.

Features: ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is praised for comprehensive patch management, automated updates, and ease of use. Users value its integration capabilities. GFI LanGuard is appreciated for offering detailed vulnerability assessments, robust security features, and extensive network-wide auditing. Users feel GFI LanGuard's features give it a competitive edge despite the higher price.

Room for Improvement: Reviewers suggest ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus could enhance its reporting tools and simplify navigation. For GFI LanGuard, users indicate a need for performance improvements and better customer support response times. Each tool has identified areas that require enhancements but differ in specific user demands.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Users find ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus straightforward to deploy with reliable customer service. Conversely, GFI LanGuard's deployment process is noted as more time-consuming, and its customer service receives mixed reviews. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus leads in deployment simplicity and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is appreciated for its competitive pricing and good ROI, which appeals to budget-sensitive users. GFI LanGuard, though more expensive, is seen as delivering a high ROI due to its expansive features. User reviews indicate that while GFI LanGuard is costlier, the investment is deemed worthwhile based on performance gains.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...

Ranking in Patch Management

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 3.0%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 8.2%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Ted Mbugua

Security Manager at CRAG

Scalable, light on resources, and useful visibility

The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others.

Read full review

AdeolaEkunola

Director at NIGERCUBES LTD

A quite straightforward solution that works easily with different operating systems

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. When the use of the solution for customers grows, there is a need for more endpoints, and it may grow up to 500 endpoints, and the solution's use may even be scaled up further. It is possible to do what is needed to scale up the solution for the IT environments of any of our company's customers. Before scaling up, one needs to buy the license and consider the IT architecture to see if there are any modifications required in the solution. Around three of my company's customers who manage enterprise-sized businesses with a minimum requirement of 700 endpoints at least use the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems."

"The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature."

"I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network."

"It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others."

"The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions."

"The most valuable features in GFI LanGuard are patch management and vulnerability assessment."

"The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."

More GFI LanGuard pros

"You can create remote sessions for client systems."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"The solution's technical support is top-notch. Whenever I have a question, they get back to me immediately, which is probably one of the best features of the solution's technical support."

"The fetch repository is a good feature."

"I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten."

"The initial setup was easy."

"It does not restart unexpectedly, allowing automation anytime, even during weekends."

"The automated patch deployment feature is really helpful. I can schedule it anytime, even on weekends, without needing to restart systems. The centralized management and unified console are great. It shows me which PCs are out of date or which users are breaching our policies. I can test patches before deploying them."

More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pros

Cons

"When you want to uninstall software from an endpoint, sometimes it becomes very problematic."

"GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function. Additionally, more input from GFI LanGuard for the custom software push install."

"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."

"The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes."

"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding more modules, such as asset control or asset inventory."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking."

"The version we are using only allows one person to use it at a time and does not allow multi-users."

More GFI LanGuard cons

"If a report shows that testing did not work for one version but succeeds for another, a comparison would be beneficial."

"Patching over the Internet should be improved."

"The solution should have a customer label where we can label those servers or include those servers for specific customers."

"The cloud version should have option to add all the endpoints using the agent. Not only for Windows, but also the Linux version. There are some versions which are not compatible with SaaS Manager. So some customers do not want to use the latest version of Linux latest version of CentOS. Actually, CentOS is not available. But some are using and patch manager is compatible for some versions only, not older older versions. So there are some pros and cons that are referred to patch management."

"The tool's support needs improvement."

"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to improve speed."

"Patching over the Internet should be improved. If I am traveling, I should have an Internet patching option for control, visibility, and vulnerability management for roaming users."

"I think ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus could improve its testing capabilities. If they could test different SQL versions and server versions in their sandbox, it would be better. For example, it didn't work well with Server 2012, but it works fine with 2016 and up."

More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."

"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."

"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."

"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."

"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

"The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is on the moderate side."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and the charge for support is extra."

"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is a little bit cheaper."

"Its price needs improvement."

"I rate the price of the product a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Patch Manager is cost-effective."

"The price of this product is reasonable."

"The solution cost is around $5,000 per year."

More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Photography Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GFI LanGuard?

The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

Internally, as a user, I use GFI LanGuard for email and web monitoring.

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?

The fetch repository is a good feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?

ManageEngine's licensing model recently changed from being endpoint-based to server-based, which might affect costs during the next renewal. I cannot disclose specific pricing details.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?

Patching over the Internet should be improved. If I am traveling, I should have an Internet patching option for control, visibility, and vulnerability management for roaming users. Additionally, in...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 19% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 13% of the time

NinjaOne vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 10% of the time

BigFix vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 7% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

Compared 18% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

Compared 16% of the time

BigFix vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

Compared 15% of the time

Qualys Patch Management vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard

March 2025

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

March 2025

Download ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

No data available

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

Patch Manager Plus is a simple patch management tool that makes it easy to keep your network patched and secure. It is an endpoint patch management software that provides enterprises a single interface for automating all patch management tasks - from detecting missing patches to deploying patches - for Windows, Mac, Linux and 250+ third-party applications. Whether you have one computer or hundred, they can all be patched at the same time from a single point of console.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

March 2025

Free Report: GFI LanGuard vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GFI LanGuard vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.