Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

ManageEngine and Microsoft are both solutions in the Patch Management category. ManageEngine is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. ManageEngine holds a 10.2% mindshare in PM, compared to Microsoft’s 19.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Read 13 ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus reviews
  • 2,048 Views
  • 1,705 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Read 80 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews
  • 4,919 Views
  • 3,894 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

Microsoft Configuration Manager and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus compete in the system management and patch deployment market. ManageEngine appears to have an upper hand due to its simplicity, ease of use, and cost-effective pricing, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is known for its extensive features and integration.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive system management with software deployment, patch management, and hardware inventory. It offers centralized operation and integration with Microsoft products, enabling efficient control over configurations, compliance, and security. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus excels in lightweight structure and effective vulnerability management, alongside automation features for simplified patch deployment across diverse environments. Both systems provide robust management options, yet ManageEngine is highlighted for its straightforward usability.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager users experience high resource consumption and complex configurations, seeking better PowerShell integration and non-Microsoft product updates. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus requires an enhanced reporting interface and improved client segregation customization. Users desire more intuitive use and better cross-platform integration, especially for Apple products. In contrast, SCCM users seek better compliance reporting and mobile device management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager primarily offers on-premises deployment with some cloud integration, backed by extensive documentation, though technical support quality varies. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus shares similar deployment flexibility but is known for faster implementation. Both products provide varied user experiences in customer service, with ManageEngine's support noted as more consistently reliable.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager is considered expensive, with potentially high licensing costs that may include extra fees for SQL server integration. It can deliver a strong ROI in large settings due to its extensive features, though setup may be costly. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a cost-effective alternative with straightforward annual subscriptions, providing a reasonable ROI for patch management. Its simpler pricing and lower entry costs make it appealing to small businesses and budget-conscious teams.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,129 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Ranking in Patch Management
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (3rd), Configuration Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 10.2%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 19.5%, up from 19.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola - PeerSpot reviewer
A quite straightforward solution that works easily with different operating systems
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. When the use of the solution for customers grows, there is a need for more endpoints, and it may grow up to 500 endpoints, and the solution's use may even be scaled up further. It is possible to do what is needed to scale up the solution for the IT environments of any of our company's customers. Before scaling up, one needs to buy the license and consider the IT architecture to see if there are any modifications required in the solution. Around three of my company's customers who manage enterprise-sized businesses with a minimum requirement of 700 endpoints at least use the solution.
Read full review
Abul Fazal - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable
The initial setup for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is simple. However, the configuration and management are not simple. Most of my clients are using the on-premise configuration. Cloud deployment is cumbersome because It requires lots of system communication to open from the cloud, and every client has to communicate with the cloud. We follow the Microsoft best practices procedure and white papers for implementation. Which includes single and multiple server deployments. The time it takes for deployment depends on the client's environment, such as the configuration and customization needed. However, the process can typically take two to three weeks to complete.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's technical support is top-notch. Whenever I have a question, they get back to me immediately, which is probably one of the best features of the solution's technical support."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is centralized management."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus covers almost all my end devices, and I can easily look over my device's hardware status."
"You can create remote sessions for client systems."
"The ability to deploy patches seamlessly is the solution's most valuable aspect. It allows us to not only deploy patches but to monitor the deployment of those patches."
"It is a highly stable solution."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is lightweight and has a remote push feature that helps me manage several main sites and subsites."
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pros
"I like a lot of the reporting capabilities and baseline configurations."
"What's valuable is the basic management of the systems, being able to control who can access the systems."
"With the right administrator, application deployment can do wonders."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is patch management."
"With the SCCM inventory, we found a lot of rogue applications. We were able to identify them, find out who was running them, and either put them on our application list or remove them."
"The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's incredibly simple to configure and execute changes in bulk, allowing for seamless deployment. With this solution, you can easily track the status of all modifications and send them with ease, making it a comprehensive and efficient solution for any necessary adjustments."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager helps with patch management."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros
 

Cons

"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to improve speed."
"The only area for improvement in ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, which I noticed, is the reporting."
"The cloud version should have option to add all the endpoints using the agent. Not only for Windows, but also the Linux version. There are some versions which are not compatible with SaaS Manager. So some customers do not want to use the latest version of Linux latest version of CentOS. Actually, CentOS is not available. But some are using and patch manager is compatible for some versions only, not older older versions. So there are some pros and cons that are referred to patch management."
"The agent can be a bit more intelligent."
"I find the user interface a little bit intimidating and not very appealing."
"The solution should have a customer label where we can label those servers or include those servers for specific customers."
"The tool's support needs improvement."
"The user interface of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to be made more user-friendly, simplified, and less complicated."
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus cons
"The solution could improve the functionality for automating, license management. Additionally, more and better-looking reports are needed."
"The solution is crowded with information."
"The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool."
"The solution can be improved with the addition of a mobile device manager."
"It is a bit of an old and outdated product."
"The reports are too busy. They could be simpler. I'm a technician, so I don't care how pretty the reports look. They should be easy to read. I'm designing this for production folks. They need to read the reports quickly when they're patching in the middle of the night."
"The solution is on-premises. The cloud version of the product, if a person needs to be on the cloud, would be InTune, which already exists as an option. SCCM doesn't need to offer cloud features for this reason."
"Management of Linux devices could be improved."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution cost is around $5,000 per year."
"I rate the product price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"The price of this product is reasonable."
"I rate the price of the product a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"Patch Manager is cost-effective."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is a little bit cheaper."
"Its price needs improvement."
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and the charge for support is extra."
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pricing and cost advice
"The license price could be reduced for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager They should make the price more affordable for smaller companies, most companies would be able to use the solution if it was priced better. There are more people on this cloud because you don't have to have either a server room or an on-premise server. You can have one IT person handle this without any local infrastructure."
"SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free."
"Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing."
"Its price is okay because it is part of our licensing."
"We use the tool's free license. It is expensive."
"The price of SCCM depends on the size of the organization. The price is competitive."
"We have to pay for a license."
"I would rate the cost as eight out of ten."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
The fetch repository is a good feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
Patch Manager is cost-effective.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
The solution needs to improve its testing environment and reporting. For example, if a patch doesn't work for SQL 9 but works for SQL 10, a comparison report would be helpful. I think ManageEngine ...
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
See all answers
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 18% of the time
BigFix vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
BigFix vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 17% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 14% of the time
GFI LanGuard vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
GFI LanGuard vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 11% of the time
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 3% of the time
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Competitors
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 8% of the time
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 6% of the time
BMC Client Management vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
BMC Client Management vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 3% of the time
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
December 2024
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus reportDownload ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
December 2024
Microsoft Configuration Manager reportDownload Microsoft Configuration Manager product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
 

Learn More

ManageEngine
Microsoft
 

Overview

Patch Manager Plus is a simple patch management tool that makes it easy to keep your network patched and secure. It is an endpoint patch management software that provides enterprises a single interface for automating all patch management tasks - from detecting missing patches to deploying patches - for Windows, Mac, Linux and 250+ third-party applications. Whether you have one computer or hundred, they can all be patched at the same time from a single point of console.

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

 

Sample Customers

IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
December 2024
Free Report: ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.