Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

ManageEngine and Microsoft are both solutions in the Patch Management category. ManageEngine is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. ManageEngine holds a 10.1% mindshare in PM, compared to Microsoft’s 19.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Read 14 ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus reviews
  • 1,948 Views
  • 1,647 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Read 81 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews
  • 4,851 Views
  • 3,736 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

Microsoft Configuration Manager and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus compete in the system management and patch deployment market. ManageEngine appears to have an upper hand due to its simplicity, ease of use, and cost-effective pricing, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is known for its extensive features and integration.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive system management with software deployment, patch management, and hardware inventory. It offers centralized operation and integration with Microsoft products, enabling efficient control over configurations, compliance, and security. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus excels in lightweight structure and effective vulnerability management, alongside automation features for simplified patch deployment across diverse environments. Both systems provide robust management options, yet ManageEngine is highlighted for its straightforward usability.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager users experience high resource consumption and complex configurations, seeking better PowerShell integration and non-Microsoft product updates. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus requires an enhanced reporting interface and improved client segregation customization. Users desire more intuitive use and better cross-platform integration, especially for Apple products. In contrast, SCCM users seek better compliance reporting and mobile device management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager primarily offers on-premises deployment with some cloud integration, backed by extensive documentation, though technical support quality varies. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus shares similar deployment flexibility but is known for faster implementation. Both products provide varied user experiences in customer service, with ManageEngine's support noted as more consistently reliable.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager is considered expensive, with potentially high licensing costs that may include extra fees for SQL server integration. It can deliver a strong ROI in large settings due to its extensive features, though setup may be costly. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a cost-effective alternative with straightforward annual subscriptions, providing a reasonable ROI for patch management. Its simpler pricing and lower entry costs make it appealing to small businesses and budget-conscious teams.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,997 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Ranking in Patch Management
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (3rd), Configuration Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 10.1%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 19.6%, up from 18.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola - PeerSpot reviewer
A quite straightforward solution that works easily with different operating systems
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. When the use of the solution for customers grows, there is a need for more endpoints, and it may grow up to 500 endpoints, and the solution's use may even be scaled up further. It is possible to do what is needed to scale up the solution for the IT environments of any of our company's customers. Before scaling up, one needs to buy the license and consider the IT architecture to see if there are any modifications required in the solution. Around three of my company's customers who manage enterprise-sized businesses with a minimum requirement of 700 endpoints at least use the solution.
Read full review
MikeNelson2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Deployment recovery works well but requires configuration improvements
While I do not use the product frequently, many issues were due to configuration rather than the product itself. I cannot give an exact recommendation as it is not my area of responsibility. The team that uses it finds it adequate. It is presently good enough for us not to investigate other options. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"It is a highly stable solution."
"The most valuable features are patch management and mobile device management."
"The ability to deploy patches seamlessly is the solution's most valuable aspect. It allows us to not only deploy patches but to monitor the deployment of those patches."
"The initial setup was easy."
"The fetch repository is a good feature."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus covers almost all my end devices, and I can easily look over my device's hardware status."
"It does not restart unexpectedly, allowing automation anytime, even during weekends."
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pros
"I find the product valuable for deployment recovery and it has done much more than that."
"This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD."
"It has the ability to perform mass distribution."
"It's helped us solve problems surrounding patching, installing, and reporting different patches, etc., on the virtual machines."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager gives different tools in one solution."
"The initial setup is fairly straightforward."
"It is easy to install, and quick to deploy."
"We're a Microsoft-centric organization, so we are happy with the integration between products."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros
 

Cons

"They should add better features for managing hardware."
"The tool's support needs improvement."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to improve speed."
"The solution's initial setup is not straightforward, and we have to customize it with our relevant features."
"The solution's UI is an area that requires improvement."
"The only area for improvement in ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, which I noticed, is the reporting."
"I think ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus could improve its testing capabilities. If they could test different SQL versions and server versions in their sandbox, it would be better. For example, it didn't work well with Server 2012, but it works fine with 2016 and up."
"I find the user interface a little bit intimidating and not very appealing."
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus cons
"The time the solution takes for updating systems could be quicker. For example, the system information status is not updating as it should. Additionally, the database synchronization querying is slow and could be improved."
"The cost of the product can be improved."
"The downside of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's an on-premise-based solution. With the pandemic coming on board the need to support users across the globe has increased. For a while, we would use the in-built Microsoft Teams screen sharing feature but the disadvantage of that is you cannot perform privileged access. Microsoft does not give you access to that. That's where you need cloud-based tools, such as BeyondTrust or Freshservice."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually."
"It is a bit of an old and outdated product."
"The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool."
"The ability to integrate MDM would be great."
"Management of Linux devices could be improved."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price needs improvement."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is a little bit cheaper."
"I rate the price of the product a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is on the moderate side."
"The solution cost is around $5,000 per year."
"Patch Manager is cost-effective."
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and the charge for support is extra."
"The price of this product is reasonable."
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pricing and cost advice
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"There is an annual license needed to use the solution."
"We have a support license from Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager and the overall price of the solution is reasonable."
"The price model is different for every client."
"Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it."
"Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose."
"The price is competitive and reasonable."
"As far as I know, it is an annual operating expense license."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
The fetch repository is a good feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
Patch Manager is cost-effective.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
The solution needs to improve its testing environment and reporting. For example, if a patch doesn't work for SQL 9 but works for SQL 10, a comparison report would be helpful. I think ManageEngine ...
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
See all answers
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 18% of the time
BigFix vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
BigFix vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 17% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 14% of the time
GFI LanGuard vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
GFI LanGuard vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 10% of the time
Qualys Patch Management vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
Qualys Patch Management vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 3% of the time
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Competitors
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 8% of the time
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 6% of the time
Red Hat Satellite vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Satellite vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
January 2025
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus reportDownload ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
January 2025
Microsoft Configuration Manager reportDownload Microsoft Configuration Manager product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
 

Overview

Patch Manager Plus is a simple patch management tool that makes it easy to keep your network patched and secure. It is an endpoint patch management software that provides enterprises a single interface for automating all patch management tasks - from detecting missing patches to deploying patches - for Windows, Mac, Linux and 250+ third-party applications. Whether you have one computer or hundred, they can all be patched at the same time from a single point of console.

ManageEngine

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
January 2025
Free Report: ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.