Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BigFix vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers highly responsive customer support, often resolving queries within hours, earning high user satisfaction ratings.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.7
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs improvements in support, UI, communication, out-of-network patching, intelligence, reporting, setup, updates, speed, compatibility, testing, pricing, and hardware management.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.5
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus scales efficiently, supports many OS and apps, and users appreciate its manageable licensing for large environments.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Users find ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pricing moderate, with annual costs around $5,000 and varying opinions on affordability.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is highly stable, consistently performs well, and is easy to deploy and operate across servers and workstations.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.6
Comprehensive, user-friendly centralized management tool offering multi-OS support, automation, patching, vulnerability management, and reporting with rollback capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

BigFix
Ranking in Patch Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (5th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (15th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (4th)
ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Ranking in Patch Management
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of BigFix is 13.7%, up from 11.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 9.9%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Bella Yakoby - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers third-party patching feature, good scalability, and enhance endpoint management capabilities
From the perspective of the team that's handling the environment, it's not so user-friendly compared to other solutions, the competitors. We hire new teams from time to time, and they are complaining, look, although BigFix is very robust and cross-platform, it's not so fun to work with. The user interface for the technical teams is not so advanced. It's not so intuitive compared to SCCM, compared to ManageEngine. And this is the fact that they have, with the teams, because they have the rejection. The look and feel of the system are old-fashioned. For new employees, it's less easy to find someone I don't need to educate on how to work with BigFix. Although it's easy, it's not as intuitive as the other solutions, and the functionality of the other solutions is less advanced. Let's summarize: The user interface has to be changed from the perspective of the teams that are managing the product. It's old school.
Sereyreach Dy - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool for vulnerability patching and easy management of patches with a great technical support team
Products like Tenable or CrowdStrike offer a good and less complicated user interface. The user interface of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to be made more user-friendly, simplified, and less complicated. For additional features in the solution, I would want the solution to provide me with a detailed view of each patch. If the solution could copy that information and show it on the console, instead of having to click on the plugin ID or the plugin name to redirect you to the patch and all its related information, the need to be redirected to another website to read all the information can be eliminated, and it would be great.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
49%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BigFix?
The most valuable features of the solution are Windows patching and the hardware and software inventory.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigFix?
The pricing is competitive, but not the most competitive.
What needs improvement with BigFix?
BigFix could improve its asset management capabilities to discover assets, including hardware. More improvements could be made in asset management.
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
The solution needs to improve its testing environment and reporting. For example, if a patch doesn't work for SQL 9 but works for SQL 10, a comparison report would be helpful. I think ManageEngine ...
 

Also Known As

Tivoli Endpoint Manager
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

US Foods, Penn State, St Vincent's Health US Foods, Sabadell Bank, SunTrust, Australia Sydney, Stemac, Capgemini, WNS Global Services, Jebsen & Jessen, CenterBeam, Strauss, Christian Hospital Centre, Brit Insurance, Career Education Corporation
IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
Find out what your peers are saying about BigFix vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.