Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Microsoft Windows Server Update Services comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Ranking in Patch Management
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Windows Server Up...
Ranking in Patch Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 10.1%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is 9.2%, down from 14.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola - PeerSpot reviewer
A quite straightforward solution that works easily with different operating systems
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. When the use of the solution for customers grows, there is a need for more endpoints, and it may grow up to 500 endpoints, and the solution's use may even be scaled up further. It is possible to do what is needed to scale up the solution for the IT environments of any of our company's customers. Before scaling up, one needs to buy the license and consider the IT architecture to see if there are any modifications required in the solution. Around three of my company's customers who manage enterprise-sized businesses with a minimum requirement of 700 endpoints at least use the solution.
Mashood Atitebi - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust and stable platform for centralized update management enhancing system security
One area for potential improvement involves the administrative portal, where numerous options, including asset management and patch management, are integrated. There's a suggestion that decoupling these integrated tools might be beneficial. This decoupling could involve separating services or options to provide more flexibility and potentially reduce costs, allowing for a more modular approach to the utilization of these tools.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup was easy."
"The most valuable features are patch management and mobile device management."
"The fetch repository is a good feature."
"You can create remote sessions for client systems."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution's technical support is top-notch. Whenever I have a question, they get back to me immediately, which is probably one of the best features of the solution's technical support."
"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"The automated patch deployment feature is really helpful. I can schedule it anytime, even on weekends, without needing to restart systems. The centralized management and unified console are great. It shows me which PCs are out of date or which users are breaching our policies. I can test patches before deploying them."
"The solution can be used to update PCs and servers."
"This solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use."
"The performance has been okay."
"It provides central management interface for deployment."
"We can easily download particular patches, and we can apply them on a group basis and policy basis."
"The platform provides good value in terms of time and effort by eliminating the need for manual patch management."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is highly stable. It is one of the most stable solutions from Microsoft."
 

Cons

"If a report shows that testing did not work for one version but succeeds for another, a comparison would be beneficial."
"There are limitations to this solution when we are working with iOS, Apple laptops or desktops such as the Mac and iMac."
"The agent can be a bit more intelligent."
"They should add better features for managing hardware."
"I think ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus could improve its testing capabilities. If they could test different SQL versions and server versions in their sandbox, it would be better. For example, it didn't work well with Server 2012, but it works fine with 2016 and up."
"The tool's support needs improvement."
"The solution's UI is an area that requires improvement."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to improve speed."
"More integration with different platforms would be an improvement."
"The old backup files created by this solution use up a lot of storage, and this needs to be improved."
"Because you have to pay for the product and there may be other good free solutions, this may not be the best choice for a cost-minded organization."
"User interface is outdated and not user-friendly."
"Having the ability to group updates by the operating systems would be very helpful."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services could improve by being less cumbersome to use. It's somewhat difficult to use, but we manage to get through it."
"There are several areas needing improvement, including the management of third-party patches."
"Could be improved with additional features such as an update alarm."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is a little bit cheaper."
"I rate the product price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"I rate the price of the product a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"Its price needs improvement."
"The solution cost is around $5,000 per year."
"The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is on the moderate side."
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and the charge for support is extra."
"Patch Manager is cost-effective."
"The product is not expensive."
"Microsoft's operating model determines the solution's pricing, and we use it based on our enterprise agreement, which incurs an annual cost."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is not an expensive solution."
"The product is expensive."
"We need one single key for Windows deployments, which is a better option. Buying a license with the same key for all systems, like Windows and Windows Desktop, makes configuring easier. Otherwise, it isn't easy to manage multiple keys for different systems."
"While it might be relatively more expensive for smaller companies, larger enterprises can find it robust and capable of delivering significant value."
"Because it is not open-source, it has to compete with open-source solutions. Relatively it is expensive to open-source."
"The solution is expensive, and the licensing costs are yearly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
The solution needs to improve its testing environment and reporting. For example, if a patch doesn't work for SQL 9 but works for SQL 10, a comparison report would be helpful. I think ManageEngine ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Windows Server Update Services?
Our experience with Microsoft Windows Server Update Services involves no setup cost or licensing fees, as it is included with our existing licenses.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Windows Server Update Services?
There are several areas needing improvement, including the management of third-party patches, better enforcement of patch deployment on user PCs, and the ability to schedule updates at specific tim...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Windows Server Update Services, Microsoft WSUS, WSUS, Microsoft Software Update Services, Software Update Services, Microsoft SUS, SUS, MS Windows Server Update Services
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.