Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GFI LanGuard vs SolarWinds Patch Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard's customer service is generally quick and helpful, though some users in certain regions face challenges.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard requires enhancements in LAN expansion, Linux docs, cloud support, custom software, asset tracking, and additional features.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard is scalable and adaptable, supporting various workloads and platforms, suitable for small to large organizations.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard offers competitive patch management pricing, with costs around $1,000 to $2,500 annually and discounts for Gold partners.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard is highly stable, with improved functionality and minimal issues, even during server updates, rated eight out of ten.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
GFI LanGuard excels in vulnerability assessment, patch management, ease of use, integration, resource efficiency, asset tracking, and endpoint control.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard
Ranking in Patch Management
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SolarWinds Patch Manager
Ranking in Patch Management
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 3.9%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Patch Manager is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ted Mbugua - PeerSpot reviewer
Scalable, light on resources, and useful visibility
The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others.
Use SolarWinds Patch Manager?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GFI LanGuard?
The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.
What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?
The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

LanGuard
Patch Manager
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross
University of San Diego
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: November 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.