Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub CoPilot vs WorkflowGen comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (2nd)
WorkflowGen
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
37th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (28th), Business Process Management (BPM) (54th), Process Automation (40th), Low-Code Development Platforms (33rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.
CO
Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable
We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"It enhances efficiency and productivity in development."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"GitHub Copilot code suggestion capabilities are always good."
"The platform's most valuable feature is its code suggestion capability, which leverages AI to provide context-aware suggestions."
"Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"Copilot is highly recommended for everyone."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
 

Cons

"I don't have enough experience to share this kind of feedback."
"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."
"The limitation is based on the training dataset and the number of repositories."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."
"The technology offered by the product in the retail industry and banking processes has certain shortcomings, making them areas that can be improved."
"They could enhance the product's accuracy of suggestions, especially when dealing with non-standard or legacy code."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."
"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The solution is costly."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change. The pricing aligns with other AI agents like Chargebee and Anthropic Cloud. The ability to switch between m...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable s...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.