Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs Nagios Log Server comparison

Google and Nagios are both solutions in the Log Management category. Google is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0, while Nagios is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0. Google holds a 0.6% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Nagios’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

1,213 Views
1,082 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Log Server

Read 4 Nagios Log Server reviews

1,300 Views
1,108 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

Nagios Log Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Google Cloud's operations suite and Nagios Log Server are key players in the logging and monitoring solutions category. Google Cloud's suite holds an edge due to seamless integration within its ecosystem and real-time capabilities, while Nagios is appreciated for its robust configuration options and detailed insights.

Features: Google Cloud's operations suite offers cloud integration, real-time capabilities, and an adaptable infrastructure. Nagios Log Server provides comprehensive configuration options, granular insights, and a diverse feature set.

Room for Improvement: Suggestions for Google Cloud's operations suite include enhancing user documentation, troubleshooting tools, and usability. Nagios Log Server could benefit from refining scalability options, providing more intuitive setup procedures, and attracting a broader user base.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud's operations suite is straightforward to deploy with cloud integration, though customer service could improve. Nagios Log Server's setup is complex, requiring expertise, but it offers responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud's operations suite offers a competitive pricing model, especially favorable within Google Cloud environments, with a strong ROI. Nagios Log Server has higher initial setup costs, delivering clear ROI through detailed network insights and customization capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Nagios Log Server Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Nagios Log Server

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Log Management

29th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (26th), Cloud Monitoring Software (23rd)

Nagios Log Server

Ranking in Log Management

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 0.6%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Log Server is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or BigQuery can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings.

Read full review

Syarul Idzuddin Adzmi

Operation Director at Digital Pulse Sdn Bhd

A scalable and affordable tool for monitoring data centers

Five engineers are needed for the maintenance of the product. I would definitely recommend the solution to those planning to use it. To increase the rating for the product, Nagios should offer remote support and offer more customization in reporting while making it easy for the customers to use it. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Google's technical support is very good."

"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports."

"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."

"The cloud login enables us to get our logs from the different platforms that we currently use."

"Offers a valuable logging transport feature"

"It's easy to use."

"I like the monitoring feature."

"We find the solution to be stable."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

"The initial setup of Nagios Log Server was easy and straightforward."

"One of the most valuable features is the dashboard because the UI was effective and easy to use. The alert systems are good as well. We had no failovers and had high availability. We can search the queries fast as well in Nagios Log Server."

"A great feature of the solution involves its internal portal."

"The product is scalable."

Cons

"It could be more stable."

"The process of logging analytics can be improved"

"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."

"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."

"It could be even more automated."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

"The configurations during initial setup could be improved. If they could be agentless, as in the case of the Ansible product, it would be better. I would like to be able to analyze the network bandwidth."

"The customization and dashboards have shortcomings and need to be improved to make the tool look more presentable."

"As we are talking about a product which is open to the public, the pricing makes it challenging for us to profit off of its marketing."

"The support could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost could be lower."

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

"For a single instance, the price is around $4,000."

"We found the pricing to be quite affordable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap, I rate the pricing an eight or nine."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Stackdriver?

If the errors are caught early in the interface, it would be easier for users to manage. The process of logging analytics can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Stackdriver?

I use the solution for logging, defining alerts, and monitoring. Our company's Java and Python logging teams mainly use it.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Stackdriver?

The Ops Agent and logging transport feature of the solution have had a major impact on improving application performance. The solution also allows the transport of logs into log buckets, which is h...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Log Server?

The initial setup of Nagios Log Server was easy and straightforward.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Log Server?

My company pays around 500 to 1,000 USD per year toward the licensing cost of the solution. For support, we need to pay extra to Nagios. The solution's price is low. On a scale of one to ten, where...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Log Server?

The customization and dashboards have shortcomings and need to be improved to make the tool look more presentable. The reporting side of the product should allow users to have more customized reports.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 30% of the time

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 22% of the time

New Relic vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Wazuh vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 55% of the time

Graylog vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 15% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 7% of the time

syslog-ng vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 7% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Nagios Log Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Log Server

March 2025

Download Nagios Log Server product report

Also Known As

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Real-time log management and analysis

Cloud Logging is a fully managed service that performs at scale and can ingest application and platform log data, as well as custom log data from GKE environments, VMs, and other services inside and outside of Google Cloud. Get advanced performance, troubleshooting, security, and business insights with Log Analytics, integrating the power of BigQuery into Cloud Logging.

Built-in metrics observability at scale

Cloud Monitoring provides visibility into the performance, uptime, and overall health of cloud-powered applications. Collect metrics, events, and metadata from Google Cloud services, hosted uptime probes, application instrumentation, and a variety of common application components. Visualize this data on charts and dashboards and create alerts so you are notified when metrics are outside of expected ranges.

Stand-alone managed service for running and scaling Prometheus

Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed Prometheus-compatible monitoring solution, built on top of the same globally scalable data store as Cloud Monitoring. Keep your existing visualization, analysis, and alerting services, as this data can be queried with PromQL or Cloud Monitoring.

Monitor and improve your application's performance

Application Performance Management (APM) combines the monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities of Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring with Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler to help you reduce latency and cost so you can run more efficient applications.

Google

Nagios Enterprises delivers official products, services, and solutions for and around Nagios – the industry standard in enterprise-grade IT infrastructure monitoring. With millions of users worldwide, Nagios is the undisputed champion in the IT monitoring space. Our team of dedicated professionals works to ensure total customer satisfaction with all the services we provide. Our extensive network of partners helps extend Nagios services and solutions to new organizations and markets worldwide to meet a variety of business needs. Nagios Enterprises was founded in 2007 by Ethan Galstad. Ethan created what would later become known as Nagios in 1999, and currently serves as the President of Nagios Enterprises.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

IBM, impulse, wipro, comteco

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Nagios Log Server

April 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Nagios Log Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Nagios Log Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Nagios Log Server report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.