Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Users are generally satisfied with AWS support but have limited direct experience with AWS X-Ray support specifically.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
7.0
AWS X-Ray's complex interface and lack of features like anomaly detection and integration hinder user experience and analytical effectiveness.
No sentiment score available
It should also include anomaly detection capabilities, similar to machine learning, and have custom metadata to trace vulnerabilities.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
AWS X-Ray is praised for its scalability, seamlessly supporting large-scale applications with ease across diverse organizational needs.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
AWS X-Ray offers scalable pricing with affordability varying by business size, providing discounts for large enterprises and differences for government users.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.9
AWS X-Ray is highly stable and reliable, with minor offshore issues unrelated to internal bugs or data loss.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.6
AWS X-Ray offers robust tracing, error tracking, compliance support, performance monitoring, and direct queries for debugging and security insights.
No sentiment score available
The most beneficial feature is that it shows a dashboard for performance intervals, which reveals latencies.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS X-Ray
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
14th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Google Cloud's operations s...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
22nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (24th), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS X-Ray is 3.9%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 1.5%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Parth Solanki - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time, is relatively cheap, and helps find errors
If we get any error, we can go to X-Ray and get all the requests for a certain error in one place. It makes it easy to find the issue in your own product. You can look at logs and error logs and find loopholes. You can do direct queries to get specific requests over the course of a day. It's very good at error reporting and quite fast. You also get a lot of information, including IP addresses, user locations, et cetera.
Anand_Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations
As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or BigQuery can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS X-Ray?
AWS X-Ray is a strong solution and has a smooth integration process.
What needs improvement with AWS X-Ray?
They can improve how traces are sent to other providers.
What needs improvement with Google Stackdriver?
If the errors are caught early in the interface, it would be easier for users to manage. The process of logging analytics can be improved.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

COMCAST, ConnectWise, skyscanner, AirAsia, cookpad, cimpress, VTEX, zowdow
Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS X-Ray vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.