Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS X-Ray vs Sentry comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Users are generally satisfied with AWS support but have limited direct experience with AWS X-Ray support specifically.
No sentiment score available
Many users find Sentry's documentation sufficient, but some rate technical support 3.5/5 and use third-party resources for help.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
7.0
AWS X-Ray's complex interface and lack of features like anomaly detection and integration hinder user experience and analytical effectiveness.
No sentiment score available
Sentry needs better automation, user metrics, customizable views, simpler integration, improved alerting, debugging, tracing, and enhanced admin features.
It should also include anomaly detection capabilities, similar to machine learning, and have custom metadata to trace vulnerabilities.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
AWS X-Ray is praised for its scalability, seamlessly supporting large-scale applications with ease across diverse organizational needs.
No sentiment score available
Sentry scales efficiently for teams of varying sizes, handling millions of users and metrics without resource complaints or performance issues.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
AWS X-Ray offers scalable pricing with affordability varying by business size, providing discounts for large enterprises and differences for government users.
No sentiment score available
Sentry provides cost-effective pricing options, including a free plan, flexible paid plans, and a self-hosted open-source version.
AWS X-Ray is very beneficial, however, it is expensive.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.9
AWS X-Ray is highly stable and reliable, with minor offshore issues unrelated to internal bugs or data loss.
No sentiment score available
Users generally rate Sentry positively for stability and reliability, appreciating its good uptime and open-source nature.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.6
AWS X-Ray offers robust tracing, error tracking, compliance support, performance monitoring, and direct queries for debugging and security insights.
No sentiment score available
Sentry offers integration, error tracking, performance monitoring, security, and ease of use, making it superior to New Relic and Azure Monitor.
The most beneficial feature is that it shows a dashboard for performance intervals, which reveals latencies.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS X-Ray
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
14th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sentry
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Debugging (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS X-Ray is 3.9%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 6.4%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Parth Solanki - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time, is relatively cheap, and helps find errors
If we get any error, we can go to X-Ray and get all the requests for a certain error in one place. It makes it easy to find the issue in your own product. You can look at logs and error logs and find loopholes. You can do direct queries to get specific requests over the course of a day. It's very good at error reporting and quite fast. You also get a lot of information, including IP addresses, user locations, et cetera.
Abdullah Baig - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy-to-use solution that has a good dashboard, performs well, and provides flexible pricing
Sentry was easy to learn compared to New Relic and Azure Monitor. I saw some valuable input. It took us the least amount of time to see how Sentry is valuable. It took just a few minutes. Session Replay provides a replay of the recorded errors. It is a good feature. Azure Monitor does not have this feature. The error reporting is straightforward. We can see everything that we need to see. The dashboard seems pretty fine. The product performs well. We can see the user's IP addresses.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS X-Ray?
AWS X-Ray is a strong solution and has a smooth integration process.
What needs improvement with AWS X-Ray?
They can improve how traces are sent to other providers.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?
The product costs $26 a month if we choose a yearly subscription. Code coverage can be added for an additional $29 per month. The Team plan is the cheapest package available. We can make our own bu...
What needs improvement with Sentry?
It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

COMCAST, ConnectWise, skyscanner, AirAsia, cookpad, cimpress, VTEX, zowdow
Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS X-Ray vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.