Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs Huawei eSight comparison

Grafana Labs and Huawei are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Grafana Labs is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.2, while Huawei is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.7. Grafana Labs holds a 0.8% mindshare in IM, compared to Huawei’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Grafana Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 72% of Huawei users who would recommend it.
Grafana Enterprise Stack
Read 9 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews
  • 692 Views
  • 501 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Huawei eSight
Read 10 Huawei eSight reviews
  • 1,174 Views
  • 861 Comparison Views
72% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Huawei eSight and Grafana Enterprise Stack compete in IT monitoring and management. Grafana Enterprise Stack appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features, justifying its higher cost, whereas Huawei eSight stands out in pricing and support.

Features: Huawei eSight focuses on network management with comprehensive visualization, automation capabilities, and infrastructural oversight. Grafana Enterprise Stack is known for flexible data visualizations, integration with various data sources, and customizable dashboards.

Room for Improvement: Huawei eSight could enhance integration flexibility, expand data source compatibility, and improve dashboard customization. Grafana Enterprise Stack might work on improving its pricing structure, enhance support for network management functions, and streamline more features for infrastructural oversight.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huawei eSight offers a user-friendly deployment with strong support, suitable for organizations needing steady assistance. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides streamlined cloud-based deployment with a broad support ecosystem, ideal for those prioritizing quick setup and community resources.

Pricing and ROI: Huawei eSight is cost-effective, yielding substantial ROI for users needing affordable network oversight. Grafana Enterprise Stack requires a higher investment but delivers high ROI with its advanced analytics, justifying costs for data-driven organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Grafana Enterprise Stack
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
25th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Huawei eSight
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
34th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Network Management Applications (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huawei eSight is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Gregory Diana - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers very good charting capabilities and capable of automatically generating dashboards, even for a large number of data points
In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party. It's like Node-RED. Node-RED is free, and you can choose an application, but that application depends on the person who's supporting it. If they decide not to support it, then you're stuck. However, I believe that it can't be improved or changed because people have to make money and make a living from it. Nothing will ever be changed. It depends on the software. Same as Windward. Windward just decided it could not support a large number of customers, so it focused on high-income, low-volume clients. Whereas Node-RED has millions of followers and fantastic support, the same as Grafana. Grafana is partly free, but it's your problem. That's how all these companies work. If you're big and you pay a lot of money, they'll pay attention to you.
Read full review
Gary Strydom - PeerSpot reviewer
Used to monitor devices and provides the hardware alarms feature
Huawei eSight has helped me overcome many monitoring aspects of the hardware. From a single view, I can monitor all the hardware. Instead of logging on to each piece of hardware and monitoring it individually, I can monitor them from one single point. I would recommend the solution to other users because it provides a single point of view of the hardware. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Grafana's most valuable feature is its ability to provide a graphical representation of data collected from various sources."
"Our productivity has improved with its use."
"The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance, from 10 AM to 2 PM, we may experience high memory utilization. It helps us to solve these issues."
"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Grafana Enterprise Stack is the dashboards."
"It is truly reliable."
"Grafana has enough features around dashboard management. It's got enough plugins to create your dashboards."
"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."
More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros
"The solution's most valuable dashboard features include monitoring storage, resource availability, and hardware alarms."
"The most important features are alarm management and the visualization of the health of our network devices."
"I like the real-time location monitor or RTLS feature. It is similar to the monitoring feature in Cisco Prime."
"eSight allows me to monitor and solve any problem in the backbone and any switch in real-time."
"Huawei eSight provides businesses with monitoring capabilities of network devices across your network."
"I like that it supports all our Huawei devices. Unlike other network monitoring tools that monitor Huawei devices, it provides more details when it comes to monitoring or management. We can get complete details about the devices, and management is also simple."
"The product is stable."
"We use Huawei eSight to monitor devices like Wi-Fi controllers, LAN switches, and routers."
More Huawei eSight pros
 

Cons

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."
"In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party."
"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."
"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."
"They could use more small tutorials to explain a bit about how Grafana works."
"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."
"The solution should include integration with Power BI."
"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."
More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons
"This solution could be improved by offering monitoring for all devices and not only Huawei devices."
"It is not a very flexible product."
"eSight has many features and options, but sometimes, we feel that it should be more advanced, like Cisco. It would be good if they can enable some automation part in eSight. Most of our customers want automation in their network. They don't want a dependency on everything. That's why the automation part must be improved in Huawei. It will be beneficial for customers. Cisco has different products, and there are multiple products for monitoring, automation, etc. In the software-defined network, Cisco has ACI, and VMware has NSX. Such options must be there in Huawei to move to a software-defined network. Unlike Cisco, in the case of eSight, there is only one product. I am not aware of any other product. It would be good to enhance it with at least some automation options so that we can use it effectively in the campus network or big data center environment. When I implemented this Huawei solution, I faced some limitations in particular areas like wireless scanning. This is another part that they can improve. Wireless reporting option is not as effective as other monitoring solutions. For a particular use case, if a customer is asking for some reports, sometimes they are not 100% satisfactory. The reporting structure must be improved."
"The price could be less costly."
"Something that could be improved is the lack of integration with Cisco switches. In the next release, I would like to see better reporting."
"Huawei eSight should work on the option to have the email notification working on Office 365 Exchange."
"It will be better if they can make the simple network topology part more presentable. It would also be better if they had API integration and integration with third-party devices."
"The variety of license types should be made simpler as, at present, it is complex."
More Huawei eSight cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the tool's free license."
"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing. The pricing depends on which features you use and can become expensive."
"Its pricing is better than any other Huawei product. Some products are cheaper in Huawei, and some products are cheaper in Cisco. Cisco has more benefits and options than Huawei if you consider different network environments."
"Pricing depends on the competition. If your competitor is like Cisco, then Huawei is much more competitive when it comes to pricing."
"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."
"The price is very expensive."
"The pricing for Huawei eSight is reasonable, especially with the base license and incremental licenses for additional devices. However, the variety of license types can be a bit complex. We used to sell eSight but switched to another solution, so we're not actively trading it anymore."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Grafana Enterprise Stack?
The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance,...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?
From an analytics perspective, the integration of AI would be a beneficial improvement for Grafana Enterprise Stack.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?
Our primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack includes monitoring cluster utilization, taking care of impact avoidance, conducting upgrades, ensuring storage memory does not become full, and id...
See all answers
What do you like most about Huawei eSight?
We use Huawei eSight to monitor devices like Wi-Fi controllers, LAN switches, and routers.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Huawei eSight?
Huawei eSight should work on the option to have the email notification working on Office 365 Exchange.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Huawei eSight?
We use the solution to monitor the hardware environment of our data center. We mainly use Huawei eSight to monitor the devices. It assists in monitoring our devices in terms of utilization and moni...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 39% of the time
OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 19% of the time
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 12% of the time
Cisco Intersight vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
Cisco Intersight vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 10% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 7% of the time
More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors
Zabbix vs Huawei eSight Logo
Zabbix vs Huawei eSight
Compared 29% of the time
Cisco DNA Center vs Huawei eSight Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs Huawei eSight
Compared 23% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Huawei eSight Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Huawei eSight
Compared 9% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs Huawei eSight Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Huawei eSight
Compared 8% of the time
Nagios XI vs Huawei eSight Logo
Nagios XI vs Huawei eSight
Compared 5% of the time
More Huawei eSight Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Grafana Enterprise Stack
April 2025
Grafana Enterprise Stack reportDownload Grafana Enterprise Stack product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
April 2025
Huawei eSight reportDownload Huawei eSight product report
 

Overview

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications. 

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

Huawei's eSight is a unified software suite for planning, operating, and maintaining complex enterprise ICT infrastructure from global, converged networks and data centers to multimedia and video communications that includes the facilities necessary for delivering performance and IT services. eSight provides a platform that supports infrastructure and devices from third-party providers, to develop custom management applications and improves O&M efficiency.

Huawei
 

Sample Customers

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell
Marina Bay, CITIC Pacific Mining
Buyer's Guide
Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight
April 2025
Free Report: Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight
Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.