Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Grafana vs JenniferSoft comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Grafana users appreciate efficient support through active community forums, responsive customer service, and comprehensive documentation for effective issue resolution.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.2
Grafana users seek better security, reporting, integrations, user-friendliness, alerting, licensing flexibility, charting, and stability improvements.
No sentiment score available
It would be better if they made the technology easy to use without needing to read extensive documentation.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
Grafana is scalable and supports many users, though it can be complex and costly, especially in the open-source version.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Grafana provides free open-source and paid enterprise editions, with pricing based on infrastructure and daily metric ingestion.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Grafana is highly rated for stability, though backend improvements and issues with extensive SRE techniques are noted by some.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Grafana offers customizable dashboards, integration flexibility, and efficient data sharing, excelling as a cost-effective, open-source visualization tool.
No sentiment score available
It's comparable to Terraform, and I prefer CloudWatch.
 

Categories and Ranking

Grafana
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JenniferSoft
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
51st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Grafana is 7.2%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JenniferSoft is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

AbhishekGupta - PeerSpot reviewer
Beneficial operational excellence, reliable, and scalable
We are using Grafana for observability dashboards Grafana has helped our organization with observability and operational excellence. Operational excellence is a key part of any organization from a data platform perspective and setting the alerts and monitoring policies on Grafana was easy. The…
ML
Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable
I use JenniferSoft to monitor the performance and transaction traces of our applications The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to divide the authorization of users because a lot of the people in our organization have different authorizations. The dashboard is a valuable…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Grafana?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana?
For me, Grafana is a cheap tool because I don't have to spend much time learning the product since it is a simple solution. I don't know if there are different paid versions of the product.
What needs improvement with Grafana?
Grafana could improve by having its own query language. Currently, it uses languages like Prometheus or InfluxDB, which not everyone knows. Their query language should be easier.
What needs improvement with JenniferSoft?
The solution is pricy and has room for improvement.
What is your primary use case for JenniferSoft?
I use JenniferSoft to monitor the performance and transaction traces of our applications.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Adobe, Optum, Sky, Nvidia, Roblox, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Informatica, Maersk, Daimler Truck, SNCF, Atlassian, DHL, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, Cisco, Citi and many others.
Standard Charter, SAS, SK, Mini Stop, AIG, SMBC, Prudential, Samsung, 3M, Meritz, LG, CJ, Pasco, Metr Asia Capital
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: November 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.