Harbor vs Red Hat Quay comparison

Red Hat Quay and Harbor compete in the container registry solutions category. Red Hat Quay has the upper hand in user support and pricing, while Harbor stands out in feature richness for those who invest in capabilities enhancement.

Features: Red Hat Quay is recognized for robust security, scalability, and enterprise-friendly attributes. Harbor excels with its support for multiple authentication methods, role-based access controls, and comprehensive access management features.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Quay could improve integration capabilities, performance speed, and lean more towards enhancing flexibility. Harbor needs better documentation, enhanced storage management efficiency, and streamlined configuration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Quay offers a straightforward deployment process backed by a responsive support team and clear guidelines, receiving strong customer feedback. Harbor, on the other hand, has a flexible deployment model suited for tech-savvy teams but presents more complexity in user reviews.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Quay users appreciate its cost-effectiveness, achieving a satisfactory balance between price and features for a positive ROI. Harbor, despite higher upfront costs, provides long-term benefits and justifies cost for users desiring extensive flexibility in registry management.