Red Hat Quay and Harbor compete in the container registry category for enterprise environments. Harbor seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive functionality and superior features, which tech buyers value despite its complexity and cost.
Features: Red Hat Quay offers automation capabilities, integrated security scanning, and enhanced distribution features. Harbor provides robust security features, LDAP integration, and comprehensive artifact management, aligning closely with enterprise requirements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Quay supports straightforward deployment with exemplary customer service, resulting in fewer disruptions. Harbor's deployment is more complex but offers greater flexibility in various environments, with multiple deployment options that benefit diverse scenarios.
Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Quay presents a cost-effective solution with clear ROI benefits, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Harbor requires a higher initial investment but delivers a compelling ROI due to its advanced features, providing significant long-term value.
Harbor is an open source container image registry that secures images with role-based access control, scans images for vulnerabilities, and signs images as trusted. A CNCF Incubating project, Harbor delivers compliance, performance, and interoperability to help you consistently and securely manage images across cloud native compute platforms like Kubernetes and Docker.
Red Hat Quay is a private container registry that stores, builds, and deploys container images. It analyzes your images for security vulnerabilities, identifying potential issues that can help you mitigate security risks.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
