Red Hat Quay and Harbor compete in the container registry market. Harbor often has an edge due to its robust feature set, making it a strong option despite pricing differences.
Features: Red Hat Quay offers advanced image security, vulnerability scanning, and automation capabilities. Harbor stands out with role-based access control, Kubernetes integration, and image replication and retention policies.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Harbor is noted for straightforward deployment and strong Kubernetes integration. Red Hat Quay provides superior customer support services, offering dedicated assistance which can be significant for enterprises.
Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Quay's competitive pricing and reliable ROI are attractive for long-term cost-effectiveness. Harbor, being open source, has a lower setup cost, providing significant ROI through savings in licensing fees. Absence of dedicated support could influence ROI expectations.
Harbor is an open source container image registry that secures images with role-based access control, scans images for vulnerabilities, and signs images as trusted. A CNCF Incubating project, Harbor delivers compliance, performance, and interoperability to help you consistently and securely manage images across cloud native compute platforms like Kubernetes and Docker.
Red Hat Quay is a private container registry that stores, builds, and deploys container images. It analyzes your images for security vulnerabilities, identifying potential issues that can help you mitigate security risks.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
