Amazon ECR vs Red Hat Quay comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Red Hat is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 15.9% mindshare in CR, compared to Red Hat’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 23 Amazon ECR reviews

3,751 Views
3,751 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Quay

Read 5 Red Hat Quay reviews

1,694 Views
1,694 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

Red Hat Quay

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Amazon ECR and Red Hat Quay compete in container registry services. Amazon ECR stands out due to its seamless integration with AWS, whereas Red Hat Quay is recognized for its comprehensive security and image management features, appealing to enterprises focused on security.

Features: Amazon ECR offers automated vulnerability scanning, lifecycle policies, and smooth AWS integration. Red Hat Quay provides distributed storage, a Quay Security Scanner for image analysis, and geo-replication features.

Room for Improvement: Amazon ECR could benefit from broader compatibility beyond AWS ecosystems, improved user interface customization, and more flexible pricing options outside AWS scope. Red Hat Quay could enhance speed in deployment, expand its customer support channels, and streamline its integration process with non-RHEL environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon ECR benefits from AWS's robust support systems and offers a straightforward deployment experience within AWS. Red Hat Quay, while requiring a steeper learning curve, provides personalized customer service and relies heavily on open-source community support.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon ECR utilizes a cost-effective pay-as-you-go model, especially advantageous for AWS users looking for budget-friendly options. Red Hat Quay's pricing might be higher at the onset due to its self-hosted nature but can deliver significant ROI when its extensive features are fully leveraged, particularly in secure environments where its advanced capabilities are fully utilized.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Quay

Ranking in Container Registry

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 15.9%, down from 17.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Quay is 7.8%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon ECR	15.9%
Red Hat Quay	7.8%
Other	76.3%

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

PrashantaPaudel

Wordpress Trainer at SpeedZone.fi

Has supported container workflows through fast image handling and seamless service integrations

The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is that we can push and pull faster than other similar products. It means saving and retrieving more efficiently. This is not manual dragging and dropping, but rather programmatic taking and saving. I have used Amazon ECR with Lambda, EC2, and EFS. These are integrable services where you can call Amazon ECR from anywhere in AWS. If my product is not always dependent totally on Amazon ECR only, but if the product is dependent on Amazon ECR only, then having a low time to load, low time to save, and a faster containerizing process time would affect the software's response time. This is important.

Read full review

AnilKumar13

Devops Engineer at EDAG

Integrated container platform has simplified module updates and has improved RHEL-based workflows

The best features Red Hat Quay offers for my work are that it is easily integrated with RHEL. This means we do not require any additional subscription for Red Hat Quay. If our environment is RHEL-based and we have already purchased the subscription for RHEL, it is better to use Red Hat Quay. Red Hat Quay has positively impacted my organization by improving reliability because it comes with the RHEL subscription, so we do not require any other, and it is easily integrated with all the RHEL-related tools like OpenShift.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very stable."

"It is easy to use compared to other container registries."

"The autoscaling functionality is the main beneficial feature of Amazon ECR. It simplifies management, but some configurations can complicate things a bit."

"The most valuable feature is that Amazon ECR is very simple and useful."

"ECR provides robust security features, including image scanning and vulnerability assessment, supported by AWS identity and access management for fine-grained access control."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is how it organizes the code and the infrastructure."

"One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utilizing load balancers via AWS features allows us to manage all traffic."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the scanning of images for vulnerabilities."

More Amazon ECR pros

"Things like downloading an image, pulling an image, tagging, and pushing it back to the needed organization are fairly easy compared to doing things through the command-line interface."

"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."

"Red Hat Quay's automated image building enhances CI/CD pipeline efficiency because all our applications are deployed through CI/CD pipeline, whether Jenkins or Octopus, and can pull images directly through Red Hat Quay using robot accounts and service accounts."

"Red Hat Quay's automated image building has helped my CI/CD pipeline efficiency by allowing me to store my source code from GitHub and GitLab to my images, making it easier to deploy and run the application without any troubleshooting."

"The best features Red Hat Quay offers for my work are that it is easily integrated with RHEL, so if our environment is RHEL-based and we have already purchased the subscription for RHEL, it is better to use Red Hat Quay because it also improves reliability and integrates easily with all the RHEL-related tools like OpenShift."

Cons

"There were a few issues related to the roles, policies, and retrieval of data when trying to fetch images for deployment on Amazon ECS. This can involve permissions and configuration complexities."

"There could be improvements to the interface of AWS concerning ECR."

"If I could use less code and have more of the user interface provide predictions of the coding required in my CLI or Terraform, that would be nice."

"I would appreciate a feature in Amazon ECR that allows direct image downloads from open source into ECR, bypassing the current need to first pull the image to my server."

"ECR is reliable, however, I don't consider it the best container registry available."

"Improving the documentation for easy understanding will help bring in more clients to use Amazon ECR."

"Deeper integration with other security tools would enhance usability."

"Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime."

More Amazon ECR cons

"Nothing is happening regarding AI. I don’t see the role of AI currently."

"Red Hat Quay can improve its statistics capabilities. Currently, we don't have means to check the overall utilization, such as the number of repositories, frequency of usage for each repository, and which users are accessing specific repositories."

"I think Red Hat Quay could improve the security, as users can download the images without a login."

"It could be more integrated with other platforms."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

When it comes to pricing for Amazon ECR, that is the only area AWS has to look into. Services like IoT services or SageMaker are very high, and many times customers complain that while the initial ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

For potential areas of improvement in Amazon ECR, I need to check if AWS has features similar to Azure Defender for scanning, getting vulnerabilities, and patching recommendations. Regarding additi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon ECR?

The main use case for Amazon ECR is that whatever containerized image we are building will be pushed to Amazon ECR, and then it will get deployed into a Kubernetes cluster. I appreciate that if my ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Quay?

I am not facing any kind of issue with Red Hat Quay at this time.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Quay?

In terms of a specific example of how I use Red Hat Quay, we have an environment where we are managing Terraform code stored in GitLab. We run a pipeline and create a renovate pipeline which checks...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Quay?

If you are considering Red Hat Quay, my advice is that if you have a RHEL environment and you have already purchased the RHEL subscription, then you must use Red Hat Quay because it is easily integ...

See all answers

Comparisons

JFrog Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 15% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 12% of the time

Google Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 9% of the time

Alibaba Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 7% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

Harbor vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 27% of the time

Azure Container Registry vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 15% of the time

JFrog Container Registry vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Harbor Registry vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Quay Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR

November 2026

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Quay

October 2026

Download Red Hat Quay product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

No data available

Overview

Amazon ECR provides efficient storage and management for Docker images, supporting seamless integration with AWS services. It offers private and public repositories, emphasizing security and elasticity for microservices and CI/CD workflows.

Amazon ECR is a robust platform for managing Docker containers, offering users swift operation and centralized management capabilities with intuitive features. This service supports Docker integration, enhancing security with image vulnerability scanning. Its strong alignment with AWS services like ECS and EKS facilitates efficient deployment of containerized applications. Users benefit from features like version control, load balancing, and enhanced scalability. Encryption and IAM policies ensure secure access control, making it ideal for microservices and continuous integration workflows.

What are the key features of Amazon ECR?

Swift Operation: Delivers fast performance for container management.
Docker Integration: Seamlessly works with existing Docker environments.
Image Vulnerability Scanning: Strengthens security by identifying vulnerabilities.
Private & Public Repositories: Offers flexible storage options for images.
Load Balancing: Enhances performance within AWS infrastructure.
Encryption & IAM Policies: Supports secure access controls for users.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlined workflows with AWS service integration.
Security Enhancements: Robust protection against vulnerabilities.
Scalability: Capability to handle growing workloads seamlessly.
Flexibility: Handles microservices and monolithic architectures alike.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overheads through automation and integration.

AWS ECR is widely adopted across industries, offering reliable image storage and management solutions. Its flexibility allows tech companies to implement DevOps pipelines with ease, automating image updates and facilitating CI/CD processes. It empowers teams managing containerized applications, especially in sectors highly dependent on scalable and secure cloud infrastructure.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat Quay is a reliable container image registry streamlining image management and integration across platforms, with a user-friendly interface and role-based access control for managing user permissions efficiently.

Red Hat Quay supports container image storage across platforms, including OpenShift. It offers features like automated image building for enhanced CI/CD processes, geo-replication for consistent access, and seamless RHEL integration. While its continuous updates boost performance and reliability, there is room for improved platform integration, AI capabilities, and security measures. Organizations use Quay for enterprise image management, enabling multiple organizations under a single account and facilitating CI/CD pipelines.

What are the most important features?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and management of container images.
Automated Image Building: Enhances CI/CD efficiency with streamlined processes.
Role-Based Access Control: Manages user permissions securely and effectively.
Geo-Replication: Ensures redundancy and access across different regions.
Integration with RHEL: Offers seamless compatibility with existing Red Hat systems.
Storage for Scalable Platforms: Supports platforms like OpenShift for scalable image storage.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficiency in CI/CD: Automated builds improve workflow efficiency.
Enhanced Security: Role-based access control and geo-replication add security layers.
Scalability: Supports growth with integration into scalable platforms.
Cost-Effectiveness: Use with existing Red Hat subscriptions enhances value.
Flexibility: Facilitates enterprise-level image management and multiple organizations per account.

Red Hat Quay is implemented across industries for container image management and application deployment. Organizations leverage its compatibility with OpenShift to manage repositories efficiently, integrate into CI/CD pipelines, and use it for development and training purposes. Quay plays a crucial role in managing Terraform code stored in GitLab, providing a comprehensive repository for diverse containers and applications.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

The Asiakastieto Group, Akbank, TTTECH

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay

September 2026

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.