Amazon ECR vs Red Hat Quay comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Red Hat is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 16.0% mindshare in CR, compared to Red Hat’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 23 Amazon ECR reviews

3,308 Views
3,308 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Quay

Read 5 Red Hat Quay reviews

1,541 Views
1,541 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

Red Hat Quay

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Amazon ECR and Red Hat Quay compete as container registries, with Amazon ECR better integrated with AWS, while Red Hat Quay is stronger in security.

Features: Amazon ECR offers seamless AWS integration, automatic image scanning, and lifecycle policies for effective image management. Red Hat Quay provides enhanced security with image vulnerability scanning, supports multiple architectures, and includes build automation tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon ECR deploys easily within AWS, facilitating management for AWS users and offers responsive customer support. Red Hat Quay allows flexible deployment across environments, supported by comprehensive documentation, benefiting complex deployments with substantial technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon ECR follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, delivering high ROI for AWS users due to integration and cost efficiency. Red Hat Quay involves higher setup investment, providing value through advanced security and comprehensive features for security-focused users.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,692 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Quay

Ranking in Container Registry

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 16.0%, down from 17.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Quay is 8.2%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon ECR	16.0%
Red Hat Quay	8.2%
Other	75.8%

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

PrashantaPaudel

Wordpress Trainer at SpeedZone.fi

Has supported container workflows through fast image handling and seamless service integrations

The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is that we can push and pull faster than other similar products. It means saving and retrieving more efficiently. This is not manual dragging and dropping, but rather programmatic taking and saving. I have used Amazon ECR with Lambda, EC2, and EFS. These are integrable services where you can call Amazon ECR from anywhere in AWS. If my product is not always dependent totally on Amazon ECR only, but if the product is dependent on Amazon ECR only, then having a low time to load, low time to save, and a faster containerizing process time would affect the software's response time. This is important.

Read full review

Marieswaran M

Network Instructor at Advantage Pro

Has allowed me to build and deploy containerized applications consistently by integrating automated image updates and CI/CD workflows

The features of Red Hat Quay that I have found most valuable include the ability to switch between the previous version and the newer version; this is an extra feature currently added, and I appreciate this feature. Red Hat Quay's automated image building has helped my CI/CD pipeline efficiency by allowing me to store my source code from GitHub and GitLab to my images. It's very convenient, and it automatically stores my images to deploy in the OpenShift application, making it easier to deploy and run the application without any troubleshooting. The positive impacts I have seen from using Red Hat Quay include the ability to change to a newer version and roll back to the older version. This is the only feature I find beneficial, and I can monitor how many people download my images, which I can verify with the analytics provided. The value of geo-replication in maintaining consistent access to container images is significant since I store data in MongoDB and use the Apache Web Server application running in Quay.io, where I store my images.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration with AWS services is very easy, and the deployment and initial setup are pretty straightforward."

"Amazon ECR provides automated image scanning, which alerts me about vulnerabilities categorized by severity, enabling me to harden images and reduce vulnerabilities before using them in production."

"The most valuable aspect of ECR is its user-friendliness."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is how it organizes the code and the infrastructure."

"There are no issues, the service is remarkably stable, and it's rare to see the registry experiencing downtime unless perhaps AWS itself is completely down."

"In the case of Amazon ECR, there are various valuable features we can see. Currently, there are image-scanning capabilities that we use."

"The main feature I value is the ability to deposit and retrieve images."

"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."

More Amazon ECR pros

"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."

"Red Hat Quay's automated image building has helped my CI/CD pipeline efficiency by allowing me to store my source code from GitHub and GitLab to my images, making it easier to deploy and run the application without any troubleshooting."

"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."

"Red Hat Quay's automated image building enhances CI/CD pipeline efficiency because all our applications are deployed through CI/CD pipeline, whether Jenkins or Octopus, and can pull images directly through Red Hat Quay using robot accounts and service accounts."

"The best features Red Hat Quay offers for my work are that it is easily integrated with RHEL, so if our environment is RHEL-based and we have already purchased the subscription for RHEL, it is better to use Red Hat Quay because it also improves reliability and integrates easily with all the RHEL-related tools like OpenShift."

"Things like downloading an image, pulling an image, tagging, and pushing it back to the needed organization are fairly easy compared to doing things through the command-line interface."

Cons

"Amazon ECR should include integration with Docker Hub."

"The documentation could be improved."

"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."

"I would appreciate a feature in Amazon ECR that allows direct image downloads from open source into ECR, bypassing the current need to first pull the image to my server."

"There were a few issues related to the roles, policies, and retrieval of data when trying to fetch images for deployment on Amazon ECS. This can involve permissions and configuration complexities."

"I suggest making it more aligned with the Docker registry version two API specification."

"If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option."

"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."

More Amazon ECR cons

"Nothing is happening regarding AI. I don’t see the role of AI currently."

"I think Red Hat Quay could improve the security, as users can download the images without a login."

"It could be more integrated with other platforms."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

When it comes to pricing for Amazon ECR, that is the only area AWS has to look into. Services like IoT services or SageMaker are very high, and many times customers complain that while the initial ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

For potential areas of improvement in Amazon ECR, I need to check if AWS has features similar to Azure Defender for scanning, getting vulnerabilities, and patching recommendations. Regarding additi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon ECR?

The main use case for Amazon ECR is that whatever containerized image we are building will be pushed to Amazon ECR, and then it will get deployed into a Kubernetes cluster. I appreciate that if my ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Quay?

I am not facing any kind of issue with Red Hat Quay at this time.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Quay?

In terms of a specific example of how I use Red Hat Quay, we have an environment where we are managing Terraform code stored in GitLab. We run a pipeline and create a renovate pipeline which checks...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Quay?

If you are considering Red Hat Quay, my advice is that if you have a RHEL environment and you have already purchased the RHEL subscription, then you must use Red Hat Quay because it is easily integ...

See all answers

Comparisons

JFrog Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 23% of the time

Azure Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 20% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 15% of the time

Google Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 9% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

Harbor vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 40% of the time

JFrog Container Registry vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Harbor Registry vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Container Registry vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Quay Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR

May 2026

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Quay

May 2026

Download Red Hat Quay product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

No data available

Overview

Amazon ECR provides efficient storage and management for Docker images, supporting seamless integration with AWS services. It offers private and public repositories, emphasizing security and elasticity for microservices and CI/CD workflows.

Amazon ECR is a robust platform for managing Docker containers, offering users swift operation and centralized management capabilities with intuitive features. This service supports Docker integration, enhancing security with image vulnerability scanning. Its strong alignment with AWS services like ECS and EKS facilitates efficient deployment of containerized applications. Users benefit from features like version control, load balancing, and enhanced scalability. Encryption and IAM policies ensure secure access control, making it ideal for microservices and continuous integration workflows.

What are the key features of Amazon ECR?

Swift Operation: Delivers fast performance for container management.
Docker Integration: Seamlessly works with existing Docker environments.
Image Vulnerability Scanning: Strengthens security by identifying vulnerabilities.
Private & Public Repositories: Offers flexible storage options for images.
Load Balancing: Enhances performance within AWS infrastructure.
Encryption & IAM Policies: Supports secure access controls for users.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlined workflows with AWS service integration.
Security Enhancements: Robust protection against vulnerabilities.
Scalability: Capability to handle growing workloads seamlessly.
Flexibility: Handles microservices and monolithic architectures alike.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overheads through automation and integration.

AWS ECR is widely adopted across industries, offering reliable image storage and management solutions. Its flexibility allows tech companies to implement DevOps pipelines with ease, automating image updates and facilitating CI/CD processes. It empowers teams managing containerized applications, especially in sectors highly dependent on scalable and secure cloud infrastructure.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat Quay is a reliable container image registry streamlining image management and integration across platforms, with a user-friendly interface and role-based access control for managing user permissions efficiently.

Red Hat Quay supports container image storage across platforms, including OpenShift. It offers features like automated image building for enhanced CI/CD processes, geo-replication for consistent access, and seamless RHEL integration. While its continuous updates boost performance and reliability, there is room for improved platform integration, AI capabilities, and security measures. Organizations use Quay for enterprise image management, enabling multiple organizations under a single account and facilitating CI/CD pipelines.

What are the most important features?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and management of container images.
Automated Image Building: Enhances CI/CD efficiency with streamlined processes.
Role-Based Access Control: Manages user permissions securely and effectively.
Geo-Replication: Ensures redundancy and access across different regions.
Integration with RHEL: Offers seamless compatibility with existing Red Hat systems.
Storage for Scalable Platforms: Supports platforms like OpenShift for scalable image storage.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficiency in CI/CD: Automated builds improve workflow efficiency.
Enhanced Security: Role-based access control and geo-replication add security layers.
Scalability: Supports growth with integration into scalable platforms.
Cost-Effectiveness: Use with existing Red Hat subscriptions enhances value.
Flexibility: Facilitates enterprise-level image management and multiple organizations per account.

Red Hat Quay is implemented across industries for container image management and application deployment. Organizations leverage its compatibility with OpenShift to manage repositories efficiently, integrate into CI/CD pipelines, and use it for development and training purposes. Quay plays a crucial role in managing Terraform code stored in GitLab, providing a comprehensive repository for diverse containers and applications.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

The Asiakastieto Group, Akbank, TTTECH

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay

April 2026

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.