Amazon ECR vs Azure Container Registry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 16.9% mindshare in CR, compared to Microsoft’s 10.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 19 Amazon ECR reviews

4,504 Views
3,933 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Container Registry

Read 19 Azure Container Registry reviews

3,409 Views
2,485 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

Azure Container Registry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Azure Container Registry and Amazon ECR are two prominent services in the container registry category. Azure Container Registry has the upper hand in pricing and support satisfaction, while Amazon ECR is preferred for its superior features despite its higher cost.

Features: Azure Container Registry integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, offers user-friendly automation tools, and provides competitive pricing. Amazon ECR is noted for its robust security features, broad compatibility with AWS services, and extensive resources.

Room for Improvement: Azure Container Registry could improve by enhancing scalability, improving logging features, and providing more comprehensive documentation. Amazon ECR could enhance user satisfaction by improving documentation, accelerating support query resolutions, and offering more flexible pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Container Registry is known for a smooth setup process, but customer support feedback is mixed. Amazon ECR is praised for responsive customer service, offering users a comprehensive support experience.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Container Registry offers competitive pricing in line with positive ROI feedback. Amazon ECR, while more expensive, justifies the cost with advanced features, though ROI satisfaction is mixed.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azure Container Registry

Ranking in Container Registry

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 16.9%, down from 18.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Container Registry is 10.9%, down from 12.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

Rikin Parekh

Backend Engineer at Northeastern University

Helps to store Docker containers and images but deployment can be complex

If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option. Setting up this product initially does take quite a bit of time, and maintaining it also requires effort. Doing it via command line would be challenging, so I find it easier to manage through the interface.

Read full review

Marek Kubovic

Cloud and DevOps Architect at Accenture

Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels

The setup was quite easy and not complicated at all. Other setups, changes, or implementations of the token skew are quite simple as well. We have the automation to set up the ACR via the Terraform and also have a graphic user interface that makes it quite easy to create. The setup is rated a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support services are excellent."

"It is easy to use compared to other container registries."

"In the case of Amazon ECR, there are various valuable features we can see. Currently, there are image-scanning capabilities that we use."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the scanning of images for vulnerabilities."

"One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utilizing load balancers via AWS features allows us to manage all traffic."

"The most valuable aspect of ECR is its user-friendliness."

"The most valuable feature is that Amazon ECR is very simple and useful."

"The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning."

More Amazon ECR pros

"Pricing is reasonable."

"It's great for storing images on containers."

"One of the benefits of this solution is that it's private and secure."

"What I like best about Azure Container Registry is that it's fast. It also has 24 x 7 reliability. I didn't face any downtime issues using Azure Container Registry. I also like how secure the solution is, especially as it's from Microsoft."

"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."

"The continuity screen is a valuable feature."

"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."

"Feature-wise, the security model and access controls are pretty straightforward and valuable"

More Azure Container Registry pros

Cons

"There were a few issues related to the roles, policies, and retrieval of data when trying to fetch images for deployment on Amazon ECS. This can involve permissions and configuration complexities."

"Amazon ECR should include integration with Docker Hub."

"If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option."

"Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime."

"The documentation could be improved."

"There is no room for improvement mentioned; it's good as is."

"One area for improvement in Amazon ECR is its complexity. It's pretty complex for newbies, particularly learning about private repositories, including how to access Amazon ECR through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)."

"Amazon ECR's manipulation capability of tags needs to be improved."

More Amazon ECR cons

"They can improve their scalability."

"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."

"The solution has no areas that need improvement."

"There is a need for a graphical interface instead of writing code in Visual Studio to create images."

"The solution could always improve its security measures with regard to access."

"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."

"The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it."

"The security, dashboards, and monitoring system could be improved."

More Azure Container Registry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"The product is competitively priced."

"I would rate the pricing four out of ten."

"Azure is a bit expensive."

"I have no information on how much Azure Container Registry costs. I know it's the only solution my institution can use, so the cost was approved."

"Azure Container Registry, has no cost, but you pay for storage service."

"The Premium version includes some enhancements but is still quite okay with regard to pricing."

"When using Azure Container Registry, it was $1.5 or $1.6 per day, but I'm unsure how much it costs today."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?

One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

Pricing varies based on the architecture and services utilized. AWS provides tools like a pricing calculator to manage costs. Serverless architecture can reduce costs, while services like Amazon EC...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

There were a few issues related to the roles, policies, and retrieval of data when trying to fetch images for deployment on Amazon ECS. This can involve permissions and configuration complexities.

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Container Registry?

Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Container Registry?

The pricing is on the lower side and not costly. Customers usually pay approximately $500 USD monthly, though this includes multiple services, not just the Azure Container Registry.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Container Registry?

There is a need for a graphical interface instead of writing code in Visual Studio to create images. Currently, it requires using PowerShell scripts or YAML files, which means needing to know scrip...

See all answers

Comparisons

JFrog Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 44% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 14% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

Google Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

JFrog Container Registry vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 30% of the time

Harbor vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 17% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 2% of the time

More Azure Container Registry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Registry

December 2024

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Container Registry

December 2024

Download Azure Container Registry product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

Microsoft Azure Container Registry

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Microsoft

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.

Azure Container Registry allows you to build, store, and manage container images and artifacts in a private registry for all types of container deployments. Use Azure container registries with your existing container development and deployment pipelines. Use Azure Container Registry Tasks to build container images in Azure on-demand, or automate builds triggered by source code updates, updates to a container's base image, or timers.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

DNV GL, Alaska Airlines, Finastra

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

December 2024

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.