Amazon ECR vs Azure Container Registry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.3% mindshare in CR, compared to Microsoft’s 12.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 23 Amazon ECR reviews

3,273 Views
3,273 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Container Registry

Read 21 Azure Container Registry reviews

2,190 Views
2,190 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

Azure Container Registry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Azure Container Registry and Amazon ECR are key players in the container registry service market. Azure Container Registry has a lead in security features and integration with Azure, while Amazon ECR is preferred for user-friendliness and AWS integration.

Features: Azure Container Registry offers role-based access control, geo-replication for global deployments, and vulnerability scanning. Amazon ECR provides seamless AWS service integration, image scanning for vulnerabilities, and is recognized for its user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Azure Container Registry could enhance accessibility, automate scanning processes, and improve downtime reliability. Amazon ECR needs more comprehensive documentation, better third-party service integration, and a more user-friendly UI.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Container Registry and Amazon ECR support both public and private cloud deployments. Azure's customer support receives mixed reviews, while Amazon ECR benefits from consistent and reliable AWS support.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Container Registry offers varying pricing tiers and is slightly more expensive but justifiable with its Azure integrations. Amazon ECR’s pay-as-you-go model is budget-friendly and suits those invested in AWS.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azure Container Registry

Ranking in Container Registry

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 17.3%, up from 17.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Container Registry is 12.3%, up from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon ECR	17.3%
Azure Container Registry	12.3%
Other	70.4%

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

PrashantaPaudel

Wordpress Trainer at SpeedZone.fi

Has supported container workflows through fast image handling and seamless service integrations

The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is that we can push and pull faster than other similar products. It means saving and retrieving more efficiently. This is not manual dragging and dropping, but rather programmatic taking and saving. I have used Amazon ECR with Lambda, EC2, and EFS. These are integrable services where you can call Amazon ECR from anywhere in AWS. If my product is not always dependent totally on Amazon ECR only, but if the product is dependent on Amazon ECR only, then having a low time to load, low time to save, and a faster containerizing process time would affect the software's response time. This is important.

Read full review

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

Geo-replication and reliable deployments with private endpoints streamline our integration processes

We are using Azure Logic Apps in our integration, in addition to Azure Container Registry The geo-replication features of Azure Container Registry are powerful. They facilitate alias connectivity and architecture implementation with private endpoints. The integration with Azure Kubernetes…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning."

"Amazon ECR has a native integration with all AWS services, making it convenient for use within the AWS ecosystem."

"The main feature I value is the ability to deposit and retrieve images."

"The Docker compatibility that ECR offers is probably the most beneficial aspect of the solution."

"The lifecycle policies of Amazon ECR help manage storage costs in my project by maintaining version control over the containerized images that we are keeping there."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is its ease of use and the centralized management console."

"The most valuable aspect of ECR is its user-friendliness."

"The integration with AWS services is very easy, and the deployment and initial setup are pretty straightforward."

More Amazon ECR pros

"We like the fact that this is a secure solution, that employs a token-based system, which can be used to manage all the applications under this product."

"Specific tokens can be used to set folder structure or restrict things like read or write access."

"The continuity screen is a valuable feature."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."

"The solution has built-in resiliency and replication zone availability so it is very stable."

"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."

"The whole package is valuable as it allows for easy application cloning and deployment."

More Azure Container Registry pros

Cons

"Deeper integration with other security tools would enhance usability."

"There were some initial connectivity issues, especially when accessing ECR from our on-prem setup."

"If I could use less code and have more of the user interface provide predictions of the coding required in my CLI or Terraform, that would be nice."

"Providing more ways to scan the image integrated with ECR would enhance security in the software development life cycle."

"One area for improvement in Amazon ECR is its complexity. It's pretty complex for newbies, particularly learning about private repositories, including how to access Amazon ECR through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)."

"There could be improvements to the interface of AWS concerning ECR."

"When it comes to pricing for Amazon ECR, that is the only area AWS has to look into."

"Its support for system architecture needs improvement."

More Amazon ECR cons

"We have found that it is sometimes difficult to pull images from the host application."

"The solution has no areas that need improvement."

"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."

"The setup process is mildly complex. There is no straightforward management platform, so there's a level of complexity to it."

"There is a need for a graphical interface instead of writing code in Visual Studio to create images."

"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."

"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."

"The solution could always improve its security measures with regard to access."

More Azure Container Registry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"The product is expensive."

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"Azure is a bit expensive."

"The Premium version includes some enhancements but is still quite okay with regard to pricing."

"Azure Container Registry, has no cost, but you pay for storage service."

"I have no information on how much Azure Container Registry costs. I know it's the only solution my institution can use, so the cost was approved."

"I would rate the pricing four out of ten."

"When using Azure Container Registry, it was $1.5 or $1.6 per day, but I'm unsure how much it costs today."

"The product is competitively priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?

One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

When it comes to pricing for Amazon ECR, that is the only area AWS has to look into. Services like IoT services or SageMaker are very high, and many times customers complain that while the initial ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

For potential areas of improvement in Amazon ECR, I need to check if AWS has features similar to Azure Defender for scanning, getting vulnerabilities, and patching recommendations. Regarding additi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Container Registry?

The pricing is on the lower side and not costly. Customers usually pay approximately $500 USD monthly, though this includes multiple services, not just the Azure Container Registry.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Container Registry?

The essential tools such as the VMs and Azure Container Registry meet our needs. We have not explored geo-replication features.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Container Registry?

I was working with SQL and in Azure DevOps. When the development team created the microservices, the microservices needed the connection with the SQL database. I used the SQL database to connect th...

See all answers

Comparisons

JFrog Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 31% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 14% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 5% of the time

Google Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon ECR

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

JFrog Container Registry vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 29% of the time

Harbor vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 21% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Container Registry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR

January 2026

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Container Registry

January 2026

Download Azure Container Registry product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

Microsoft Azure Container Registry

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Container Registry allows you to build, store, and manage container images and artifacts in a private registry for all types of container deployments. Use Azure container registries with your existing container development and deployment pipelines. Use Azure Container Registry Tasks to build container images in Azure on-demand, or automate builds triggered by source code updates, updates to a container's base image, or timers.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

DNV GL, Alaska Airlines, Finastra

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.