Amazon ECR vs Azure Container Registry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 16.9% mindshare in CR, compared to Microsoft’s 11.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 20 Amazon ECR reviews

4,198 Views
3,569 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Container Registry

Read 20 Azure Container Registry reviews

2,933 Views
2,252 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

Azure Container Registry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Azure Container Registry and Amazon ECR are major competitors in the container solutions category. Azure Container Registry is preferred for its integration with Microsoft's services and security features, while Amazon ECR is favored for its superior performance and AWS integration.

Features: Azure Container Registry is recognized for its excellent security, management of mixed containers, and automation capabilities with webhooks and CLI. It offers seamless integration with Microsoft services for direct deployments. Amazon ECR provides strong AWS integration, including image scanning, vulnerability assessment, and ease of use. It offers high elasticity, fast response times, and a centralized management console.

Room for Improvement: Azure Container Registry users mention performance issues with VPN connections, accessibility challenges, and the need for better technical support. Desired improvements include auto-scanning for vulnerabilities and enhanced integration options. Amazon ECR users highlight complexities for newcomers, inadequate documentation, and the need for better Docker Hub integration. Improvements in real-time alert systems and user interface enhancements are suggested.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Azure Container Registry and Amazon ECR offer public cloud solutions, with Azure also supporting private cloud setups. Azure's deployment is straightforward, though customer support is noted to require a plan for effectiveness. Amazon ECR receives compliments for its integration capabilities and trouble-free deployment, yet Azure's support is seen as needing more responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Container Registry offers flexible pricing based on storage needs, ranging from basic to premium tiers. Some users find the costs high, while others appreciate the flexibility. Amazon ECR's pay-as-you-go model is considered cost-effective, with users viewing its pricing as reasonable and satisfactory, especially with AWS tools to manage expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azure Container Registry

Ranking in Container Registry

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 16.9%, down from 17.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Container Registry is 11.1%, up from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

Rikin Parekh

Backend Engineer at Northeastern University

Helps to store Docker containers and images but deployment can be complex

If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option. Setting up this product initially does take quite a bit of time, and maintaining it also requires effort. Doing it via command line would be challenging, so I find it easier to manage through the interface.

Read full review

Aravindhan Suresh

DevOps Engineer at Hippo Video

Fast, secure, and has no downtime; it also has a role-based access feature

I'm not an active Azure Container Registry user, but I faced some issues, which Azure rectified after six months of usage. During the deployment, my company had a multi-stage pipeline, so whenever the team deploys via the Docker run command or generates an image, the issue arises. The problem is that whenever a new image is generated, that new Docker image isn't updated in Azure Container Registry, so that's an area for improvement. As soon as the deployment is over, my team has to go to Azure Container Registry to delete the image and start the pipeline, and only then will the image be updated. The new image isn't reflected in Azure Container Registry after deployment. My team had to take extra steps for the new image to reflect. Before 2020, Azure Container Registry didn't have the option to scan vulnerabilities, as I've heard from my team lead. After 2020, that feature was introduced in the tool, so as long as that feature is available, then Azure Container Registry is okay. I can't think of any other features to add to it in the next version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support services are excellent."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is how it organizes the code and the infrastructure."

"Amazon ECR has a native integration with all AWS services, making it convenient for use within the AWS ecosystem."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is its ease of use and the centralized management console."

"In the case of Amazon ECR, there are various valuable features we can see. Currently, there are image-scanning capabilities that we use."

"The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the scanning of images for vulnerabilities."

"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."

More Amazon ECR pros

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."

"The continuity screen is a valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."

"It's great for storing images on containers."

"The whole package is valuable as it allows for easy application cloning and deployment."

"Provides secure duplication and the option for service webhooks."

"What I like best about Azure Container Registry is that it's fast. It also has 24 x 7 reliability. I didn't face any downtime issues using Azure Container Registry. I also like how secure the solution is, especially as it's from Microsoft."

More Azure Container Registry pros

Cons

"Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime."

"The UI for managing ECR and other services could be improved. It could be user-friendly compared to other cloud services."

"If I could use less code and have more of the user interface provide predictions of the coding required in my CLI or Terraform, that would be nice."

"One area for improvement in Amazon ECR is its complexity. It's pretty complex for newbies, particularly learning about private repositories, including how to access Amazon ECR through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)."

"There were some initial connectivity issues, especially when accessing ECR from our on-prem setup."

"Deeper integration with other security tools would enhance usability."

"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."

"If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option."

More Amazon ECR cons

"The solution could always improve its security measures with regard to access."

"The setup process is mildly complex. There is no straightforward management platform, so there's a level of complexity to it."

"The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."

"Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault."

"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."

"The security, dashboards, and monitoring system could be improved."

"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."

"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."

More Azure Container Registry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The product is expensive."

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"I have no information on how much Azure Container Registry costs. I know it's the only solution my institution can use, so the cost was approved."

"I would rate the pricing four out of ten."

"Azure is a bit expensive."

"Azure Container Registry, has no cost, but you pay for storage service."

"The product is competitively priced."

"When using Azure Container Registry, it was $1.5 or $1.6 per day, but I'm unsure how much it costs today."

"The Premium version includes some enhancements but is still quite okay with regard to pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?

One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

In the ECR setup, we use a container registry per region. All accounts are within a shared account, which we call a shared account. We share the container registry across various accounts within ou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

I suggest making it more aligned with the Docker registry version two API specification. If they achieve this, it would be excellent. Eli is an example of such an implementation.

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Container Registry?

Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Container Registry?

The pricing is on the lower side and not costly. Customers usually pay approximately $500 USD monthly, though this includes multiple services, not just the Azure Container Registry.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Container Registry?

While downtime is uncommon, there are occasional server errors like '404 not found' and '504 server not found'. Viewing server logs is not a reliable approach, and improving log visibility would he...

See all answers

Comparisons

JFrog Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 45% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Amazon ECR

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

JFrog Container Registry vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 32% of the time

Harbor vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 16% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 2% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 1% of the time

More Azure Container Registry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Registry

March 2025

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Container Registry

March 2025

Download Azure Container Registry product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

Microsoft Azure Container Registry

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Container Registry allows you to build, store, and manage container images and artifacts in a private registry for all types of container deployments. Use Azure container registries with your existing container development and deployment pipelines. Use Azure Container Registry Tasks to build container images in Azure on-demand, or automate builds triggered by source code updates, updates to a container's base image, or timers.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

DNV GL, Alaska Airlines, Finastra

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

March 2025

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.