Amazon ECR vs Azure Container Registry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 16.9% mindshare in CR, compared to Microsoft’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 23 Amazon ECR reviews

3,303 Views
3,303 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Container Registry

Read 21 Azure Container Registry reviews

2,189 Views
2,189 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

Azure Container Registry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Azure Container Registry and Amazon ECR are key players in the container registry service market. Azure Container Registry has a lead in security features and integration with Azure, while Amazon ECR is preferred for user-friendliness and AWS integration.

Features: Azure Container Registry offers role-based access control, geo-replication for global deployments, and vulnerability scanning. Amazon ECR provides seamless AWS service integration, image scanning for vulnerabilities, and is recognized for its user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Azure Container Registry could enhance accessibility, automate scanning processes, and improve downtime reliability. Amazon ECR needs more comprehensive documentation, better third-party service integration, and a more user-friendly UI.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Container Registry and Amazon ECR support both public and private cloud deployments. Azure's customer support receives mixed reviews, while Amazon ECR benefits from consistent and reliable AWS support.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Container Registry offers varying pricing tiers and is slightly more expensive but justifiable with its Azure integrations. Amazon ECR’s pay-as-you-go model is budget-friendly and suits those invested in AWS.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,844 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azure Container Registry

Ranking in Container Registry

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 16.9%, up from 16.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Container Registry is 12.1%, up from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon ECR	16.9%
Azure Container Registry	12.1%
Other	71.0%

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

PrashantaPaudel

Wordpress Trainer at SpeedZone.fi

Has supported container workflows through fast image handling and seamless service integrations

The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is that we can push and pull faster than other similar products. It means saving and retrieving more efficiently. This is not manual dragging and dropping, but rather programmatic taking and saving. I have used Amazon ECR with Lambda, EC2, and EFS. These are integrable services where you can call Amazon ECR from anywhere in AWS. If my product is not always dependent totally on Amazon ECR only, but if the product is dependent on Amazon ECR only, then having a low time to load, low time to save, and a faster containerizing process time would affect the software's response time. This is important.

Read full review

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

Geo-replication and reliable deployments with private endpoints streamline our integration processes

We are using Azure Logic Apps in our integration, in addition to Azure Container Registry The geo-replication features of Azure Container Registry are powerful. They facilitate alias connectivity and architecture implementation with private endpoints. The integration with Azure Kubernetes…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is its ease of use and the centralized management console."

"The solution is very stable."

"The Docker compatibility that ECR offers is probably the most beneficial aspect of the solution."

"The technical support services are excellent."

"The most valuable aspect of ECR is its user-friendliness."

"The integration with AWS services is very easy, and the deployment and initial setup are pretty straightforward."

"It is easy to use compared to other container registries."

"The ECR solution is good. It is integrated with AWS, and it's free. Everything is free, which makes it nice to use."

More Amazon ECR pros

"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."

"Azure Container Registry can be used to detect vulnerabilities in your image."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"Provides secure duplication and the option for service webhooks."

"The scanning of Docker images is the most valuable feature."

"What I like best about Azure Container Registry is that it's fast. It also has 24 x 7 reliability. I didn't face any downtime issues using Azure Container Registry. I also like how secure the solution is, especially as it's from Microsoft."

"The solution has built-in resiliency and replication zone availability so it is very stable."

"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."

More Azure Container Registry pros

Cons

"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."

"Providing more ways to scan the image integrated with ECR would enhance security in the software development life cycle."

"Amazon ECR should include integration with Docker Hub."

"There is no room for improvement mentioned; it's good as is."

"Deeper integration with other security tools would enhance usability."

"Its support for system architecture needs improvement."

"If I could use less code and have more of the user interface provide predictions of the coding required in my CLI or Terraform, that would be nice."

"If Amazon ECR had CI/CD also integrated into it, then it would probably be better."

More Amazon ECR cons

"The building of images on the container is quite cumbersome."

"It should be easier to use. It can have more graphical interfaces to manage containers. At present, the handling or management of the containers is very basic."

"They can improve their scalability."

"Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault."

"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."

"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."

"We have not explored geo-replication features."

"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."

More Azure Container Registry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"The product is competitively priced."

"Azure is a bit expensive."

"I would rate the pricing four out of ten."

"I have no information on how much Azure Container Registry costs. I know it's the only solution my institution can use, so the cost was approved."

"Azure Container Registry, has no cost, but you pay for storage service."

"The Premium version includes some enhancements but is still quite okay with regard to pricing."

"When using Azure Container Registry, it was $1.5 or $1.6 per day, but I'm unsure how much it costs today."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?

One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

When it comes to pricing for Amazon ECR, that is the only area AWS has to look into. Services like IoT services or SageMaker are very high, and many times customers complain that while the initial ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

For potential areas of improvement in Amazon ECR, I need to check if AWS has features similar to Azure Defender for scanning, getting vulnerabilities, and patching recommendations. Regarding additi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Container Registry?

The pricing is on the lower side and not costly. Customers usually pay approximately $500 USD monthly, though this includes multiple services, not just the Azure Container Registry.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Container Registry?

The essential tools such as the VMs and Azure Container Registry meet our needs. We have not explored geo-replication features.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Container Registry?

I was working with SQL and in Azure DevOps. When the development team created the microservices, the microservices needed the connection with the SQL database. I used the SQL database to connect th...

See all answers

Comparisons

JFrog Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 32% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 14% of the time

Google Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 5% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 4% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Amazon ECR

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

JFrog Container Registry vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 30% of the time

Harbor vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 21% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Azure Container Registry

Compared 2% of the time

More Azure Container Registry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR

January 2026

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Container Registry

January 2026

Download Azure Container Registry product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

Microsoft Azure Container Registry

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Container Registry allows you to build, store, and manage container images and artifacts in a private registry for all types of container deployments. Use Azure container registries with your existing container development and deployment pipelines. Use Azure Container Registry Tasks to build container images in Azure on-demand, or automate builds triggered by source code updates, updates to a container's base image, or timers.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

DNV GL, Alaska Airlines, Finastra

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. Azure Container Registry report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.