Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Container Registry
Ranking in Container Registry
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JFrog Container Registry
Ranking in Container Registry
2nd
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Azure Container Registry is 10.7%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Container Registry is 30.1%, up from 22.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Registry
 

Featured Reviews

Marek Kubovic - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 12, 2023
Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels
Our company uses the solution to store docker or other types of images for products and software that we are developing. We use the solution for its intended purpose and how most other companies use it. We have some pipelines in Azure DevOps and we store images created through the pipelines in our…
Sai Balaji Bonagiri - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 3, 2024
Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns
JFrog Container Registry acts as a single solution for storing and managing all of our software artifacts. This includes packages, files, and containers throughout our software supply chain.  We have a central JFrog server, and we integrate various tools with it. The artifacts are stored there. It…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."
"One of the benefits of this solution is that it's private and secure."
"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."
"The solution has built-in resiliency and replication zone availability so it is very stable."
"The scanning of Docker images is the most valuable feature."
"Pricing is reasonable."
"Specific tokens can be used to set folder structure or restrict things like read or write access."
"Feature-wise, the security model and access controls are pretty straightforward and valuable"
"We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."
"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."
"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."
 

Cons

"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."
"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."
"Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault."
"The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it."
"The setup process is mildly complex. There is no straightforward management platform, so there's a level of complexity to it."
"The building of images on the container is quite cumbersome."
"The security, dashboards, and monitoring system could be improved."
"The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."
"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."
"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."
"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure is a bit expensive."
"When using Azure Container Registry, it was $1.5 or $1.6 per day, but I'm unsure how much it costs today."
"The product is competitively priced."
"The Premium version includes some enhancements but is still quite okay with regard to pricing."
"I would rate the pricing four out of ten."
"Azure Container Registry, has no cost, but you pay for storage service."
"I have no information on how much Azure Container Registry costs. I know it's the only solution my institution can use, so the cost was approved."
"The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."
"The solution is expensive."
"JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Container Registry?
Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Container Registry?
They offer three types of plans: Basic, Standard, and Premium. We have the Premium plan for our usage. In terms of cost, it includes 500 GB of free storage as part of the base plan. The pricing is ...
What needs improvement with Azure Container Registry?
It was native to Azure and well-documented, so integrating it with my services took me less than half an hour. We can host Helm charts on Azure Container Registry, which supports them. ACR doesn't ...
What do you like most about JFrog Container Registry?
It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Container Registry?
JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution’s pricing a two out of ten.
What needs improvement with JFrog Container Registry?
The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly. The documentation is mostly for the on-prem services, and there's no documentation for the clo...
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Container Registry
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DNV GL, Alaska Airlines, Finastra
Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.