JFrog Container Registry and Harbor compete in container management and orchestration; the choice often depends on organizational needs. JFrog is favored for support and pricing, while Harbor is valued for its robust features.
Features: JFrog Container Registry provides advanced registry management with support for Docker and Helm charts and broad container ecosystem integrations. Harbor integrates vulnerability scanning, role-based access controls, and focuses on security and governance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Harbor offers simplified deployment with high availability and scalability for large-scale implementations and open-source flexibility for customization. JFrog provides strong vendor support and straightforward deployment, although with less customization flexibility.
Pricing and ROI: JFrog requires moderate initial investment, promising substantial ROI due to integration with other JFrog products, enhancing cost-efficiency in larger environments. Harbor is recognized for cost-effectiveness in open-source deployments, offering quick ROI through minimal setup costs and community support.
Harbor is an open source container image registry that secures images with role-based access control, scans images for vulnerabilities, and signs images as trusted. A CNCF Incubating project, Harbor delivers compliance, performance, and interoperability to help you consistently and securely manage images across cloud native compute platforms like Kubernetes and Docker.
The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
