JFrog Container Registry and Harbor compete in container management. Users prefer JFrog for pricing and support, while Harbor is favored for its advanced features.
Features: JFrog Container Registry offers ease of integration, efficient artifact management, and seamless deployment. Harbor provides strong security features, role-based access control, and flexible deployments, crucial for container security.
Room for Improvement: JFrog needs better vulnerability scanning, UI customization, and security tools. Harbor requires improvements in scalability, third-party integrations, and customer support responsiveness.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JFrog Container Registry is easy to deploy with prompt customer service. Harbor offers flexibility in deployment but faces challenges in customer support responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: JFrog Container Registry provides competitive pricing and fast ROI. Harbor, with its zero-cost entry, has slower ROI due to hidden costs and resource requirements.
Harbor is an open source container image registry that secures images with role-based access control, scans images for vulnerabilities, and signs images as trusted. A CNCF Incubating project, Harbor delivers compliance, performance, and interoperability to help you consistently and securely manage images across cloud native compute platforms like Kubernetes and Docker.
The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
